|
Part 1 - The Medicine
Introduction
Most people could not name five of the more than 300 alternative
cancer treatments. Fewer still could name the five most potent
alternative cancer treatments for advanced cancer patients.
Some people wonder why the scores of billions of dollars spent on
the "War on Cancer," that President Nixon started in 1971/72, has
not produced a cure for cancer. Have researchers been looking for
more profitable treatments for cancer or have they been
looking for cures for cancer?
In
fact, the average person knows almost nothing about either orthodox
cancer treatments or alternative cancer treatments, outside of what
they have heard on television or read in the media.
If
a survey were taken, the average person would probably think that
the true cure rate of orthodox cancer treatments was 40% or more and
the true cure rate for alternative cancer treatments was close to
zero percent. This is total nonsense, but more will be said about
that later in this article.
Is
what you know about cancer treatments based on who has the most
truth, or is it based on who has the most money? Is what you know
about cancer treatments carefully designed to deceive you? Are you
being sold a "bill of goods?"
This website is just as important for people who don't have
cancer as it is for people who do have cancer. Why would
someone who doesn't have cancer be concerned about the truth? The
reason is that if they are diagnosed with cancer, their doctor will
immediately put intense pressure on them to commit to chemotherapy,
radiation and surgery. Unless you know whether alternative cancer
treatments or orthodox cancer treatments are superior, BEFORE
YOU ARE DIAGNOSED, there is a 100% chance you will make the
wrong decision.
If
you read all three parts of this article, you are assured of hearing
many things that have never entered your mind before. You will read
things that you will never, never hear on television or read
in print.
You will learn a lot about the techniques of deception that you are
exposed to every day. You will learn things that the people of
orthodox medicine don't want you to know. And all this information
is free. Nothing is sold from this website.
To
visualize what is going on in the "cancer industry" today, and to
see behind their massive facade, here is a short story that will
describe how orthodox medicine currently treats cancer patients.
A Story
Suppose you own a nice, comfortable, $300,000 house in the country,
near a small city. While you have gone to the store your house
catches on fire. As you return home you see that two rooms of your
house are in flames and the fire is spreading. You immediately call
the fire department.
Twenty minutes later three fire trucks show up.
The men and women in the first fire truck pull out heavy suits and
axes and run to the house and start cutting down parts of the house
that have already burned, but are still smoldering. They furiously
cut and cut and when they have cut out about 10% of the parts of the
house that have already burned, they quit and go back to their fire
truck.
You note that they did absolutely nothing to stop the spreading of
the fire. What they cut out wasn't even burning and it certainly had
nothing to do with stopping the raging fire.
You watch the men and women in the second fire truck pull out a fire
hose and start spraying a powder on the fire. The amount of powder
they were spraying did not seem to you to be enough to put out the
fire. But you notice that while the powder is slowing down the
spreading of the fire, it is also severely damaging the parts of the
house that are not on fire.
Puzzled, you ask the fireman what the powder is. They say it is a
very toxic acid that is capable of putting the fire out, but they
can't spray very much of it on the fire because if they did, the
entire house would be reduced to a pile of rubble by the acid. Thus,
all they can do is slow down the spreading of the fire, but they
can't stop the spreading of the fire.
Even more puzzled, you ask them why they did not bring water
in their fire truck. They said that in firefighter school they were
taught that water was useless in putting out house fires. They said
that using water on a house fire is an old "wives tale" and water is
not effective. They also said that the state firefighter's union
would fire any firefighter that used water on a house fire.
By
sheer coincidence you are also aware that the federal regulatory
agency, the Fire Development Administration (FDA), has researched
water and has declared that water is an "unproven" method to put out
house fires. The FDA says there is "insufficient evidence" as to
water's effectiveness and safety. You silently mumble to yourself
that there must be a huge connection between the FDA, the
firefighter's union, the firefighter schools and the chemical
companies.
While you have been talking to the men and women in the second
truck, five men have jumped out of the third fire truck. They ask
you where the couch is in the living room. You point in the general
direction of the couch in the living room, which you assume by now
is on fire.
Each of them immediately pulls out a 30-06 caliber rifle and starts
shooting at the couch from where they are standing next to their
fire truck. You scream at them and ask them what they are doing.
They respond that they have been taught in firefighter's school that
couches are very bad to have in a house during a fire, so they are
trying to shoot the couch to pieces. They comment: "We think we are
doing some good."
You say that even if the couch is helping spread the fire, that they
are blowing holes in the front and back of the house trying to shoot
the couch to pieces from outside the house. Furthermore, very
impatiently, you say the fire has already spread far beyond where
the couch is located.
While the spreading of the house fire did slow down because of the
toxic acids, within two hours you no longer have a house. The fire
men and women were quite proud that they slowed down the fire. They
tell you that your house lasted an extra hour because of their work.
You doubt the accuracy of that number. They give each other "high
fives," get in their fire trucks, and head back to the fire station.
Between the fire, the acid and the bullets, your house has been
reduced to rubble. The cutting out of the wood that had already
burned, by the first fire truck, had absolutely no affect on
stopping the fire. In fact, nothing any of them did stopped the
spreading of the fire, it only slowed it down.
You are astonished at what you have seen.
You ponder why the "investigative journalists" have not jumped on
this situation. Then you realize how much money the chemical
companies spend on television advertisements and you realize why the
"investigative journalists" have kept their mouths shut.
A
week later, as you drive by the fire department, you notice that all
of the cars in the parking lot are very expensive cars.
A
month later you know why they are driving very expensive cars. They
have sent you a bill for their services: $100,000. But they note in
the bill that the house insurance company will pay most of the bill.
You are amazed when you look at your house insurance policy and
realize the insurance company will not pay the bill if the fire
department uses water.
You ponder to yourself: "What is the connection between the fire
department, the firefighter's union, the firefighter's school, the
FDA, the insurance companies, the television stations and the
chemical companies?"
One thing is clear to you, you now know why all of your friends
think the firefighters are heroes, the television stations
constantly portray them as heros in their shows.
As
you research all of the connections between these organizations it
quickly becomes clear to you that all of them are owned or
controlled by very wealthy people who are very, very good friends
with each other. You have a brand new comprehension of what quid
pro quo means - you scratch my back and I'll scratch your back.
You conclude that a quid pro quo of this magnitude is another
term for "conspiracy."
End of Story
The Explanation
What has just been described is how "modern medicine" treats cancer
that has already metastasized. Cancer can be compared to a fire. It
is a fire that will spread until it kills you. But "modern medicine"
does nothing that will put out the fire.
The first fire truck represents surgery to cut out tumors or parts
of the body where there are concentrations of cancer cells, after
the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!
The third fire truck represents radiation, which is used to shrink
tumors, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout
the body!
While the second fire truck represents chemotherapy, the "progress"
chemotherapy is making is frequently judged by its ability to shrink
tumors. Oncologists love to tell the cancer patient that their
tumors are shrinking.
But even if chemotherapy does slow down the progress of the cancer,
and even if it puts cancer patients into remission, it is almost
always a temporary Pyrrhic victory because the cancer almost always
returns.
The Food and Drug Administration (the real FDA) has approved scores
of chemotherapy drugs, but none of them can stop the spread
of cancer because chemotherapy drugs do not target cancer cells.
There are scores of natural substances that do target cancer
cells and can stop the spread of cancer. But the FDA has never
approved a single one of these natural substances (natural
substances cannot be patented by the pharmaceutical companies).
Insurance companies will not pay for natural cancer treatments (i.e.
alternative cancer treatments). The media never says anything
good about alternative cancer treatments, but constantly glorifies
the medical profession. Medical schools have not taught a single
truthful thing about alternative cancer treatments in over 90 years.
The Importance of the
Spreading of Cancer
To
understand how all of this relates to the spreading of cancer,
consider this quote by an M.D., the late Dr. Philip Binzel:
-
"When a
patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor
discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the
tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or
chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, "How is the
tumor doing?" No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my
medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were
getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get
smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and
sicker. At autopsy we would
hear, "Isn't that marvelous! The tumor is gone!" Yes, it was,
but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going
to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are
treating the wrong thing?
In
primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the tumor is neither
health-endangering nor life-threatening.
I am going to repeat that statement. In primary cancer, with few
exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor
life-threatening. What is health-endangering and life-threatening
is the spread of that disease through the rest of the body.
There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the spread of cancer.
There is nothing in radiation that will prevent the spread of the
disease. There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the
spread of the disease.
How do we know? Just look at the statistics! There is a statistic
known as "survival time." Survival time is defined as that interval
of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is first made in a
given patient and when that patient dies from his disease.
In
the past fifty years, tremendous progress has been made in the early
diagnosis of cancer. In that period of time, tremendous progress had
been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors. Tremendous
progress has been made in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in
their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But, the survival time of
the cancer patient today is no greater than it was fifty years ago.
What does this mean? It obviously means that we are treating the
wrong thing!"
Philip Binzel, M.D., Alive and Well, Chapter 14
In
other words, if the cancer has not spread from the tumor, the tumor
presents no danger to the patient (with rare exceptions, such as
when a tumor blocks the fluid in the common bile duct).
It
is important to understand that the vast majority of cells in a
tumor are healthy cells. Cancer cells CANNOT form tissue.
Thus, if the cancer were contained within the tumor, there would not
be enough cancer cells in the person's body to endanger their life.
Likewise, if a man had prostate cancer, and the cancer was contained
inside the prostate gland, there could not be enough cancer cells
inside the prostate gland to endanger the patient's life.
Even if the cancer cells in a tumor were killed, or the tumor was
cut out, it would not solve the problem of the spreading of the
cancer if the cancer has already spread. There would be no benefit
to the patient because it is the spreading of the cancer that kills
cancer patients, not the cancer inside the tumor.
Yet the focus of orthodox medicine is on shrinking the tumors.
Chemotherapy (i.e. the second fire truck in the example) is so toxic
to cancer patients that if they gave enough of it to a cancer
patient to kill all of the cancer cells, the patient would die from
the side-effects of the chemotherapy immediately.
So
doctors give chemotherapy in very low doses (though they seem like
very high doses), not enough to actually cure you. In the mean time
the cancer continues to spread.
Chemotherapy may put a patient "in remission," but virtually every
cancer patient who goes into remission eventually comes out of
remission and later dies.
Incredibly, doctors use radiation, the third fire truck, even after
the cancer has started to spread. They are interested in shrinking a
tumor. As mentioned above, the tumor is not the problem, it is the
spreading of the cancer that is the problem.
While orthodox medicine continues to use worthless treatments, that
only temporarily slow down the spreading of the cancer, many cancer
patients who use alternative cancer treatments fare no better. Many
alternative medicine practitioners do not use the best cancer
treatments. Either they have been trained to use the most profitable
treatments, or they are simply interested in making as much money as
possible as fast as possible.
To
make matters worse, vendors of natural supplements generally only
sell their products, thus if they have a very weak product line, the
patient probably isn't going to survive.
When a person gets cancer, their chances of survival are virtually
nil. If they go with orthodox medicine they are assured they will
get the treatments discussed above.
But even if they go with alternative medicine they are likely to get
treatments that simply don't work.
This leaves the cancer patient in a quandary. No matter which way
they turn the only thing that is thriving is their cancer and their
practitioners.
But believe it or not, there is good news!
While the pharmaceutical industry is in it for the money, Mother
Nature isn't in it for money. And Mother Nature is a lot smarter
than the chemists in the pharmaceutical industry.
And there are some people in alternative medicine who are not
getting rich treating cancer patients and they know how to cure
the vast majority of cancer cases.
And there are even a few vendors who have products that are strong
enough for almost all cancer cases!
This very long article, which is practically a small book in three
parts, will walk the cancer patient, or their caregiver, through the
mazes of deception that they have been exposed to all their life.
This article is definitely NOT a treatment article. Absolutely do
not use this article to put together a cancer treatment program.
There are dozens of articles on this website that deal with treating
cancer. But this article isn't one of them. When you are
finished with this article, go to the home page of this website and
the home page will walk you through the articles on treating cancer.
But for now, let us discuss why so many cancer patients die.
Introduction To The
Key Issue - Integrity
The issue of treating cancer has far more to do with integrity than
it does with science. In fact, after several years of researching
this very issue, it is clear to this author that treating cancer
today has absolutely nothing to do with science. Nothing at all.
Had scientists embraced the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s, and
refined it as future discoveries in natural medicine were made,
cancer would have been a footnote in the history books written in
the 1940s.
It
is a fact that if every person who has lived on the Earth lived the
Golden Rule, as it should be lived, cancer, and hundreds of other
diseases, would currently be a footnote in history books.
Here is a quote from the late Dr. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, who
spent 40 years of his life working in electromedicine:
-
"When I
looked into Dr. Kaali's work [Patent #5188738 describes a cure
for AIDS/HIV found at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in
1990], I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it
worked all of the time [at curing AIDS/HIV]. For two and a half
years, we gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali,
whose name is on the patent. Then I discovered that there was a
long history of this technology. We followed a trail of these
patents back 107 years! We found a patent, #4665898, that cured
all cancer, dated May 19, 1987. Why has this been suppressed?
Why hasn't your doctor told you about an absolutely proven,
established cure for cancer? The answer is that doctors get
$375,000 per patient for surgery, chemotherapy, x-ray, hospital
stays, doctors and anesthesiologists. This is the official
statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Unfortunately,
the medical patient cured is a customer lost.
A
lot of people say, "Aren't you infringing on others' patents?" In
the beginning, I was nervous, but when I found this technology had
been discovered and rediscovered for 107 years, I changed my mind.
Now I am broadcasting it from the rooftops. Still, it is very
touchy. It's rocking the pharmaceutical, surgical and diagnostic
industries. But I really feel that I have been called to do this. I
have had people come to my door with guns. I have been threatened
and chased. But I think God wants this information out. I feel it is
my mission to give people back to themselves, to deliver them from
these vested interests, these [medical] priesthoods that are taking
everyone's money. I am not charging a nickel."
Bob Beck, PhD, Interviewed by Kenneth and Dee Burke
As
another example, in 1976, two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling,
PhD, and an associate, Ewan Cameron, M.D., did a published
scientific study in Scotland that resulted in proving that Vitamin
C, given by I.V., of 10 grams a day, could extend the average length
of time a terminal cancer patient lives by six times or more.
Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have quickly
replicated his study, come to the same conclusion (because they did
exactly what he did), and would have quickly started giving every
cancer patient, terminal or otherwise, 10 grams of Vitamin C by I.V.
every day.
But that is not what happened.
What really happened is that 3 studies were done at the Mayo Clinic,
all of which were directly a result of the Pauling/Cameron study.
However, these studies were not designed to replicate the
Pauling/Cameron research. Instead they were designed to AVOID
replicating the Pauling/Cameron protocol, AVOID their patient
mix, and AVOID their statistical methods. Obviously, if you
don't follow the same protocol, you won't get the same results. And
they didn't.
Here is what the American Cancer Society (ACS) says about this
issue:
-
"The Pauling
study has been criticized by the NCI [National Cancer Institute,
a division of the NIH or National Institutes of Health, a U.S.
government agency] for being poorly designed, and subsequent
studies done at the Mayo Clinic found that advanced cancer
patients given the same dosage of vitamin C did not survive any
longer than those not given the supplement. However, the Mayo
Clinic trials have also been criticized for not fully addressing
all the issues related to the effects of vitamin C, which still
left questions about its effectiveness in the treatment of
cancer."
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3x_Vitamin_C.asp
The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus
Pauling (one of his Nobel Prizes was the Nobel Peace Prize, the
other was in chemistry). So they quote the totally corrupt NIH
(Note: 500 NIH employees were recently caught taking bribes from the
pharmaceutical industry, which they called "outside consulting
fees") and state that a world famous chemist, and two-time Nobel
Prize winner, doesn't know how to design a scientific study!!
But they also admit that the Mayo clinic did not use the same
protocol as Pauling and Cameron. So if there are "still left
questions," why hasn't the ACS used their annual scores of millions
of dollars of income, and their political clout, to set the record
straight and replicate the study as originally done? It has been
more 30 years since the original study, yet no one in orthodox
medicine, with their billions of dollars in research money, not even
the ACS or NIH, has replicated the Pauling/Cameron study.
It
appears that extending the life expectancy of terminal cancer
patients six-fold, using natural substances, is not important
to orthodox medicine.
In
fact, two other studies did replicate the Pauling/Cameron study far
more closely than did the Mayo Clinic. Both of these studies
verified the Pauling/Cameron results. For more information, see:
Article from eBook: "Case Study of Scientific Corruption"
But this is just one of many, many instances where highly effective
cancer treatments have been persecuted and/or ignored.
There is, in fact, a pattern. A very clear pattern. The pattern is
that if natural substances are involved, such as vitamin C, the
study and evidence is persecuted and/or ignored. When natural
substances are involved it is called "alternative medicine." It
should be called "persecuted and/or ignored medicine."
There are more than 300 alternative cancer treatments that use
natural substances, such as Vitamin C. Every one of them is more
effective than the Pauling/Cameron protocol. Every one of them is
far more effective than chemotherapy and/or radiation. Every one of
them is ignored and many of them have been persecuted.
But there is a clear reason why natural substances are ignored. It
has nothing to do with their effectiveness. The pharmaceutical
industry cannot patent and control, and thus cannot profit from,
natural substances. They can only charge their monopolistic prices
on synthetic molecules, many of which are nothing but mutations of
natural molecules.
What is Going On In
The Cancer Industry?
The February 22, 2006 USA Today mentioned that by the year 2015, 20%
of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) could be for health spending.
Now let's be logical. Suppose a cure for cancer was found; and
suppose a treatment to avoid 90% of all heart disease problems was
found; and suppose a cure for type 2 diabetes was found; and suppose
a cure for AIDS/HIV was found. (In fact, all of these have been
found.) Would health spending ever hit 20% of GDP? Of course not.
All of these are highly profitable diseases for both the
pharmaceutical industry and the medical industry (and the
politicians who claim to represent their constituents).
All the money being rasied for treating AIDS patients in Africa are
benefiting no one but the pharmaceutical industry stockholders
because a cure for AIDS/HIV has been around since 1990.
So
in essence, the article in U.S. Today was predicting that no cures
for the highly profitable diseases would be found by the year 2015.
That is a safe prediction!! Another safe prediction would be
to predict that every new treatment for the profitable diseases will
be more expensive and more profitable than existing treatments!!
Here is another safe prediction, the 20% figure will be hit before
2015.
Here is yet another safe prediction: the media will continue to
suppress alternative treatments for cancer, heart disease, dementia,
diabetes, etc. See this web site, you will be amazed at what
alternative medicine can already prevent and cure (and this website
is just the tip of the iceberg):
Dementia, Heart Disease, Diabetes, etc. Website
Ask yourself this questions: "When was the last time orthodox
medicine used their massive profits to find a cure for any disease?"
When was the last time a cure for disease was found that used
prescription drugs? If you said polio, you would be wrong. Polio was
cured by a medical doctor in the 1940s, but the cure was suppressed
because he used a form of Vitamin C, which drug companies could not
patent and control.
Have you ever wondered what would happen if someone found a cure for
cancer? You probably think that the person finding the cure would be
featured on every television show in America and would win a Nobel
Prize in medicine. Kaali and Lyman, mentioned above, found a cure
for AIDS / HIV, and more than 200 other diseases, and they didn't
win a Nobel Prize. Have you ever heard of them before?
It
is difficult, if not impossible, to convince the average American
that orthodox medicine today is not only corrupt, it is more corrupt
than it has ever been in the history of medicine. That is saying a
lot because orthodox medicine was persecuting cures for disease in
the 1700s.
With Big Money comes Big Corruption. The bigger the money the more
the corruption.
Unfortunately, there are some in alternative medicine who are also
more interested in profits than their patients. The main difference
between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine is freedom. The
people with integrity in alternative medicine are allowed a great
deal of freedom to help others. However, the Food and Drug
Administration is always looking for excuses to crush the people who
know how to cure diseases which are highly profitable to Big Pharma
and Big Medicine (and thus Big Government).
Nevertheless, in spite of some persecution, there are over 300
alternative cancer treatments that currently exist. Every one of
them can cure some cases of cancer, if the person starts using
that treatment immediately after being diagnosed.
However, there is a very wide
range in effectiveness between these treatments, especially when
used on advanced cancer patients.
The problem with alternative medicine is that patients are
frequently on their own to find out which treatments work for their
situation - and which don't work. Unlike orthodox medicine, which is
very uniform across the country, alternative medicine is neither
organized, nor uniform. The quest for truth is always a winding and
rocky road, especially when money is involved.
Some people erroneously think that medical doctors do not use the
best alternative cancer treatments because the doctors do not know
which treatments are really effective. While medical schools turn
doctors into nothing but drug salesmen, that is not why medical
doctors do not use natural substances in the treatment of disease.
Medical doctors know how to read. But they also know that if they
used a single one of these alternative cancer treatments on a single
cancer patient, they would risk losing their license and could go to
jail!!
While it is this attitude that creates uniformity in orthodox
medicine, it is also this attitude that crushes progress. Orthodox
medicine is a highly controlled monopoly, totally controlled by the
combination of Big Pharma and the American Medical Association.
The suppression of truth by Big Medicine is why this website, and
many other websites, exist. The major purpose of this website is to
make information about alternative cancer treatments free and
available to the public so that more and more people know which
alternative cancer treatments are the strongest.
Why Some Alternative
Cancer Treatments Are Far Superior
to Orthodox Cancer Treatments
All of your life you have probably been taught that natural
substances from Mother Nature cannot possibly be as effective
against cancer as the highly condensed, highly potent synthetic
molecules made by the drug companies. In other words, you have been
taught that chemotherapy drugs kill cancer cells far better than
anything Mother Nature can put together.
That is definitely not a true statement, but even if it were true
it would be an irrelevant issue!
The key issue is whether patented drugs or Mother Nature's minerals
and nutrients
target cancer cells better.
The fact of the matter is that chemotherapy does not target
cancer cells. In fact, chemotherapy kills far, far more healthy
cells than it does cancer cells.
What this means is that chemotherapy must be given in very, very low
doses, spread out over long periods of time, and the therapy must
include gaps between the treatments. This "pacing" of the drugs is
because too many healthy cells would be killed if too much
chemotherapy were given too fast.
The reason orthodox medicine treats cancer like a chronic disease
is because orthodox treatments, in high doses, would kill the
patient long before they would cure the cancer. This failure of
orthodox medicine to safely kill cancer cells (i.e. safely target
cancer cells) is why they talk about a "5 year cure rate" rather
than a true cure rate. If they can keep the patient alive for 5
years they consider the patient to be "cured," even if they die in
the sixth year.
Mother Nature's cancer treatments, called natural cancer treatments,
or more commonly "alternative cancer treatments," generally do
absolutely no harm to healthy cells. This is because the human
body, which was made by Mother Nature, knows exactly what to do with
Mother Nature's minerals and nutrients.
Virtually all natural treatments for cancer do not kill healthy
cells - not a single one.
This is the key -
because alternative cancer treatments do not harm or kill healthy
cells, the items from nature that can kill cancer cells can be given
in much higher doses than chemotherapy - without any gaps in
treatment!!
Thus, even if the mutations of natural molecules, called drugs, were
more potent at killing cancer cells than the original natural
molecules, because of the superiority of natural substances at
targeting cancer cells or leaving healthy cells healthy, alternative
cancer treatments can be far more effective than orthodox drugs at
treating cancer!
Because Mother Nature does not necessarily condense the
cancer-killing nutrients found in foods, some of the most potent
of the alternative cancer treatments are liquid ionic minerals,
certain types of ozone treatments, and other natural treatments that
contain molecules that can be condensed, such as intravenous vitamin
C (but not the Pauling/Cameron doses, however).
Just how effective are the best treatments from Mother Nature?
Several alternative cancer
treatments have achieved a consistent 50% true cure rate on cancer
patients who had been given up on by orthodox medicine and had been
sent home to die!
Such results are possible because these key alternative cancer
treatments not only target cancer cells, they can be given in a very
condensed and potent form, they do not need a catalyst, and they can
be given safely in much higher doses than chemotherapy. Ponder that
very carefully!
Also ponder the true cure rate of these same treatments on cancer
patients who use these treatments exclusively, meaning they had not
lost many months of treatment time while being treated with orthodox
treatments!
However, do not assume every alternative cancer treatment is that
effective. Very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments can
come anywhere close to a 50% true cure rate on patients given up on
by orthodox medicine.
One of the big mistakes people who seek out alternative cancer
treatments make is to assume that if an alternative cancer treatment
will cure one patient, it will cure all cancer patients, no matter
what condition they are in. This is a dangerous assumption because
very, very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments are
condensed and potent enough to cure 50% of those sent home to die by
orthodox medicine. Very few.
An Example of One of
the Potent Alternative Cancer Treatments
There are very few minerals that can get inside of cancer cells. Two
of the minerals that can get inside of cancer cells are cesium and
potassium. Once cesium gets inside of cancer cells it starts to
"pull" potassium from the blood into the cancer cells (potassium
supplementation is required when on this treatment in order to
replenish the potassium in the blood that was pulled into the cancer
cells). When there is enough build-up of cesium and/or potassium
inside the cancer cell, glucose is blocked from getting into the
cancer cell.
Since glucose is what feeds the cancer cell, the cancer cell will
eventually die from starvation. Not only that, but cesium and/or
potassium will also block the cancer cells from making lactic acid,
meaning they block the cachexia cycle at the cancer cell. Other
items also help block or overcome the cachexia cycle in different
ways (e.g. hydrazine sulfate blocks the cachexia cycle at the
liver).
Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD, discovered in the 1980s how cesium can
treat cancer. Aside from treating the cancer, it can treat the pain
of cancer within 12 to 36 hours, depending on what is causing the
pain. The liquid ionic cesium chloride used today is much more
potent than the cesium carbonate of the 1980s. The complete protocol
includes several other items. Here is an article on this treatment:
Article: The Cesium Chloride / DMSO Protocol
Like all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments, this
treatment is so potent at killing cancer cells it must be "paced,"
meaning dosages must be set so the body has time to safely remove
the debris caused by the dead cancer cells.
Did you notice that orthodox cancer treatments must be "paced"
because of all the healthy
cells that they kill. But alternative cancer
treatments must be "paced" because of all the targeted
cancer cells they
kill.
Because of the number of cancer cells killed by the cesium
chloride / DMSO treatment, the cancer patient needs the expert
advice of a vendor who knows how to safely use these products.
Fortunately, such experts exist.
In
fact, all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments require
expert advice over the telephone or in a clinic setting. For
example, the ozone RHP and ozone liquid I.V. treatments require
expert advice or a clinic setting.
Also, these most potent treatments generally cannot be combined with
each other (but they can be combined with some other alternative
treatments). The doses for these products are designed to kill
cancer cells at a rate that the body can safely handle the debris.
To combine such treatments may create too high of a die-off rate.
[Note:
The list of alternative cancer treatments which can give a cancer
patient (given up on by orthodox medicine) hope for survival can be
found in the top section of the home page of this web site. Several
of these treatments have articles written about them on this
website.]
CancerTutor Home Page
More on Orthodox
Cancer Treatments
You probably believe that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer
treatments is around 40% and growing. This belief is the result of a
wide variety of fancy statistical tricks (which will be discussed in
Part 2 of this article). The fact is that if you get cancer, and you
use nothing but orthodox cancer treatments, your chance of surviving
your cancer (and surviving your cancer treatment) is only about 3%.
On
top of that, even the 3% who do survive have had their bodies so
severely damaged that they are vulnerable to future bouts with
cancer.
Here is what really happens to the typical cancer patient:
Step 1) The patient goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with cancer,
Step 2) The cancer surgeon cuts out the parts of the body with high
concentrations of cancer cells,
Step 3) The oncologists give the patient chemotherapy and/or
radiation,
Step 4) They send the patient home "in remission,"
Step 5) The cancer soon appears again (because they didn't actually
cure the patient),
Step 6) Go back to step 1)
This cycle continues until the patient is sent home to die (of
course, they are sent home to die after one more round of
chemotherapy and radiation). Soon the patient dies. This is the
cycle for virtually all cancer patients. The only difference between
one patient and another is how many times the cycle is repeated.
This is medicine?
One hundred years from now the medical doctors of the day will look
at the "medicine" of today in total and absolute disgust. There is
absolutely no excuse for what is going on today in medicine.
Even those who stop this nonsense and go with alternative medicine
have severe problems. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery virtually
destroy a person's immune system. A well put together natural
treatment, on the other hand, which will actually include several
different products which do different things, will actually build
the person's immune system to make sure the cancer will not return.
But alternative medicine cannot quickly mend an immune system that
has been destroyed. That is why the most potent alternative cancer
treatments do not take the time to fix the patient's immune system.
The immune system is fixed during remission.
But it gets worse.
First, ninety-five percent of cancer patients who go with
alternative cancer treatments have already been given up for dead by
orthodox medicine. In other words, they first went to orthodox
medicine, their body was destroyed by orthodox medicine, THEN
they decided to go with alternative cancer treatments.
Second, because so few alternative cancer treatments can cure people
sent home to die by orthodox medicine, very few of the cancer
patients sent home to die pick a treatment strong enough to give
them a fighting chance. In other words, very few of these cancer
patients pick one of the most potent alternative cancer treatments.
These two things create a severe disadvantage for alternative
medicine. Alternative medicine has lost between 1 and 4 years to
treat the patient and build their immune system - because the
patient was using orthodox treatments.
In
addition to that, after orthodox treatments, the patient is in far
worse physical and mental condition than they were when they were
first diagnosed. This is why there are so few alternative
cancer treatments that can achieve a true cure rate of 50% on these
patients.
If
we put all of this together we come to the following facts:
1) Almost 100% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients go with
orthodox medicine first,
2) About 97% of these patients die, or are sent home to die and
later die, due to their cancer and/or their cancer treatment,
3) Only a very small percentage of the cancer patients sent home to
die ever go with alternative cancer treatments, they simply go home
and die,
4) Of those who do go with alternative cancer treatments, only a
very small percentage of them pick a treatment strong enough to give
them a 50% chance of survival.
Is
it any wonder that deaths from cancer continue to rise in spite of
the power of some of the alternative cancer treatments?
So, what is the cure rate of recently diagnosed cancer patients who
go with alternative medicine exclusively? It depends on how
dangerous their cancer is and what treatment they pick. There are
more than 300 alternative cancer treatments.
If
they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when
they are first diagnosed, a 90% or higher true cure rate is
fairly easy to achieve. Overall, there are at least two dozen
alternative cancer treatments that can come close to a 90% overall
true cure rate across the board for those who use alternative cancer
treatments exclusively.
The amazing thing is that orthodox medicine has had its own
opportunities to have its own 90% cure rate. There are two
incredible substances that allow chemotherapy to safely target
cancer cells: insulin and DMSO.
Insulin allows small amounts of chemotherapy to target cancer cells
because of the way it works with the cell membranes. The treatment
is called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).
DMSO actually binds to small amounts of certain chemotherapy drugs.
The DMSO, which has a very high affinity for cancer cells, then
pulls the chemotherapy into the cancer cells with it. On this
website, this treatment is called DMSO Potentiation Therapy (DPT).
DPT and IPT are two treatments that are easy to combine. It is a
very potent treatment. But don't ask your oncologist about it, he or
she has probably never heard of it.
Because these two treatments use very low doses of chemotherapy
(about 1/10th a normal dose), and because the chemotherapy targets
the cancer cells, these two treatments are very potent and have
virtually no side-effects.
But orthodox medicine does not use their own discoveries!
They would rather have a 3% cure rate than a 90% cure rate!! See
this article about these two substances:
Article: DMSO - The Magic Bullet For Cancer
So, if this is true, and it is true, why haven't you heard this on
television a hundred times during your lifetime? Why don't movie
stars, "investigative journalists," etc. constantly tout the vast
superiority of alternative cancer treatments?
Why You Haven't Heard
These Things Before
Everything you hear throughout your life is not based on who
has the most truth, it is based on who has the most money. If you
haven't figured that out by now, you better figure it out real
quick.
The average American knows absolutely nothing about alternative
cancer treatments except rumors about people who probably used the
wrong treatment. Let us consider the reasons for this lack of
accurate and useful information about alternative cancer treatments
with the following list of facts:
Fact #1)
Virtually every American gets the vast majority of their information
directly or indirectly from the media, which includes television,
radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. Only the Internet, books and
emails would not be considered part of the "media."
Fact #2)
The pharmaceutical industry spends $3 billion a year advertising in
the media.
Fact #3)
In the 1940s, the book: The Drug Story was published
by newspaper owner Morris Bealle. This book exposed the vast
corruption in the media due to advertising dollars. In other words,
it exposed why newspapers (this was before television) refused to
tell the truth about corruption in corporations due to their fear of
losing advertising dollars to these same corrupt corporations.
However, it was well known long before the 1940s that advertising
money bought influence with the media. Actually, this was known no
later than the 1880s. In other words, for more than 100 years the
media has clearly understood that if you say things in the media
that are true, but cut into the profits of your advertisers, you
will quickly lose not only your advertising revenue from that
company, but possibly from many other companies as well (who also
fear any type of honesty).
Consider this quote by a famous journalist to a group of other
journalists, given in the 1880s:
-
"There is no
such thing, at this date of the world's history [1880], in
America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.
There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions,
and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear
in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of
the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar
salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so
foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets
looking for another job.
If
I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper,
before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business
of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to
pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his
country and his [human] race for his daily bread. You know it and I
know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?
We
are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the
jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We
are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton (1829-1901) pre-eminent New York journalist & head of
the editorial staff at the New York Tribune. Quoted one night
between 1880-1883.
Quoted by Upton Sinclair in his 1919 book:
The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism, page 400
Even though Upton Sinclair was famous by 1919, because he was
criticizing corruption in the media, he had to self-publish this
book.
Absolutely nothing has changed since the 1880s.
Fact #4)
As a result of the above item, and the $3 billion a year spent by
the pharmaceutical industry in the media, American journalists are
required to publicly be highly, highly loyal to the pharmaceutical
industry. A single verbal slip by a journalist on or off the air
could cost him or her their job. Prior approval by the advertisers
is required to say anything mildly negative about the pharmaceutical
industry.
These same rules apply to most major industries, not just the
pharmaceutical industry.
Fact #5)
The orthodox cancer treatments (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy,
radiation and many others) used in "modern" medicine are equally
subservient to the pharmaceutical industry. Actually, "modern"
medicine was corrupt long before the pharmaceutical industry took
over the medical schools many decades ago. Medical doctors, who
are under the control of the American Medical Association, are not
allowed to use any natural substance in the treatment of cancer.
Modern "doctors" are taught nothing but medicine using prescription
drugs.
Medical doctors are only allowed to use natural substances in the
treatment of the symptoms of prescription drugs. This is
called "complementary alternative medicine" or CAM. CAM is not
designed to treat any disease!
Because of the money of the pharmaceutical industry: the medical
community, the media and the politicians are all subservient to the
pharmaceutical industry. All are in the same bed together.
There are many books that have been written on these subjects.
Fact #6)
While vitamin companies can advertise in the media, the substances
which are used in the most potent natural or alternative cancer
treatments are never advertised in the media. Thus, the media
receives $0 dollars of advertising related to viable alternative
cancer treatments.
Thus, there is a $3 billion dollar difference between what the
pharmaceutical industry spends on advertising and what is spent for
the main substances used in alternative cancer treatments. There is
an equally proportional difference in the opinions you gather from
watching or reading the media.
Fact #7)
Taking all of the above items into account, is it any wonder that
the average American hears nothing good about alternative cancer
treatments anywhere in the media, but hears hundreds or thousands of
good things about orthodox medicine in the media every year
(thousands if you include pharmaceutical advertisements).
You might not remember hearing anything good about orthodox
medicine. Every time you watch a role-playing show on television
that glorifies a doctor or hospital you are being indoctrinated.
Every time you hear a news program that implies you should go to
your orthodox doctor for some problem, you are being indoctrinated.
Every time you hear a pharmaceutical ad you are being indoctrinated.
But you never hear anything positive about alternative cancer
treatments. This is by design.
An Even Bigger Reason
For The Great Deception
But the problem is much deeper than just advertising money. The
issue of cross-ownership and cross-board of directors control is a
far more significant reason for the great deception.
For example, as this article is being written, General Electric owns
80% of the NBC network. General Electric also owns 14 major NBC
affiliates. General Electric's partner, Telemundo (which owns the
other 20% of NBC), owns 16 major television stations. By the way, GE
now owns Telemundo.
Why is this significant? General Electric has a major division
called: "GE Healthcare." This division includes "GE Medical Systems
Information Technologies," "GE Healthcare Cintricity Pharmacy"
(which has sold about 6 billion prescriptions) and other orthodox
health related organizations.
All of these organizations, and many more, are heavily involved in
orthodox medicine. Thus, the same company, General Electric, has
major ownership in both the media and orthodox medicine.
CBS has a longstanding advertising policy that prohibits the sale of
advertising time for the advocacy of viewpoints on controversial
issues of public importance. In other words, they can censor any
advertisement they want. So much for freedom of the press. The press
has the freedom, but not the people.
A
local FOX station in Florida fired two of its reporters, Jane Akre
and Steve Wilson, for refusing to back down on an investigative
reporting segment that exposed Monsanto chemical company for adding
a toxic chemical, BGH, which causes cancer, to milk. The national
FOX network has stood solidly behind the Florida station. Are you
surprised?
For decades the 3 major television networks were so liberal that
they were no longer able to control the conservatives. Something had
to be done to manipulate and keep the conservatives from figuring
out what was going on in Washington. In 1985, the Fox Network was
founded with the main purpose of controlling the conservatives by
diverting their attention from the real corruption in
Washington and focusing the attention of the conservatives on
unimportant issues that would not threaten the profits of the main
conspiracy.
All of what has been said is just the tip of the iceberg. There is
the issue of cross-board of directors control, such as between large
cancer research clinics and pharmaceutical companies. There is also
the issue that 42 U.S. Senators (42%) own stock in the
pharmaceutical industry.
Then there is the issue of the revolving door between the FDA and
the pharmaceutical industry. There is the issue discovered by a
Los Angeles Times investigation that found out more than 500
employees of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were receiving
bribes (i.e. "outside consulting fees") from the pharmaceutical
industry. When the head of the NIH slapped a one year moratorium on
these bribes (because they got caught, not because of any modicum of
integrity), he was jeered by the crowd of NIH employees.
Follow the money trail, it all leads back to the pharmaceutical
industry and American Medical Association (AMA).
Now you know why the government and the AMA don't want you to know
the whole truth about your cancer treatment options. Now you know
why medical doctors are not allowed to use natural substances in the
treatment of cancer EVEN AFTER a person is sent home to die.
Ponder that one carefully!!
If
alternative medicine is capable of having a consistent cure rate of
90% or more, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, then clearly
orthodox medicine is also capable of having a 90% true cure
rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients if doctors were allowed to
use natural substances in the treatment of disease. That is exactly
why they are not allowed to use alternative medicine to treat
disease.
The 3% cure rate treatments are so much more profitable than the 90%
cure rate treatments, that the "leaders" of orthodox medicine have
intentionally chosen to suppress the far superior alternative cancer
treatments.
If
medical doctors were allowed to use alternative medicine on cancer
patients they sent home to die, they could cure 50% of them. That
would lead to questions of why the alternative cancer treatment was
not used first! That is
why medical doctors are not allowed to use alternative medicine even
after the pharmaceutical industry and doctors already have their
money and the patient is sent home to die!
This point is so important it cannot be made often enough. After
orthodox medicine has all the money they can get from a cancer
patient, the individual medical doctor is still not allowed
to cure the patient with alternative medicine. This is the most
telling fact of all in the battle between orthodox and alternative
medicine. It would be too embarrassing to orthodox medicine for
their cancer patients to be cured with alternative medicine after
the orthodox treatments failed! So to avoid the embarassment,
they stand back and watch their patients die a painful death.
While individual doctors may or may not know what is going on, and
may or may not be at fault for what is going on, it is clear that
the individual medical doctors can be severely criticized for
not having the guts to clean house within the national and state AMA
boards and stand up for their patient's health. They can also be
severely criticized for not desiring to learn more about alternative
cancer treatments. Most doctors don't want to "rock the boat."
What you hear from the "cancer industry" and the media does not come
from anyone who is concerned about your health (or your life), what
you hear comes from people who care about their personal assets.
What you hear is controlled very carefully by a wide network of
cross-controlled organizations and advertising money.
Indeed, those of us who are interested in telling people about their
cancer treatment options feel as the reformer Upton Sinclair felt in
1919:
-
"I was
determined to get something done about the Condemned Meat
Industry. I was determined to get something done about the
atrocious conditions under which men, women and children were
working the Chicago stockyards. In my efforts to get something
done, I was like an animal in a cage. The bars of this cage were
newspapers, which stood between me and the public; and inside
the cage I roamed up and down, testing one bar after another,
and finding them impossible to break."
Upton Sinclair, The Brass Check: A Study of American
Journalism, page 39
Even though Sinclair was famous by 1919, he had to self-publish
this book.
With the total control of information by the media, and the total
dependence of Americans on this mode of information, is it any
wonder that virtually every newly diagnosed cancer patient chooses
to go with orthodox medicine?
A Summary
Let us summarize all of the things above:
1)
Because of greed and corruption, orthodox medicine uses the most
profitable treatments for cancer, thus their true cure rate is
around 3%.
2)
The true cure rate of orthodox medicine could easily be 90% or
higher if they used the most effective orthodox cancer treatments or
the most effective alternative cancer treatments.
3)
Because of a wide variety of problems, but mainly because most
cancer patients go with orthodox cancer treatments first, the true
cure rate of alternative medicine is unknown, but it is probably
around 10% to 15%.
4)
Like orthodox medicine, the true cure rate of alternative cancer
treatments could be 90% or higher if newly diagnosed cancer patients
went with alternative cancer treatments instead of orthodox cancer
treatments and they found and used the most effective of the
alternative cancer treatments for their situation.
5)
Thus, orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have essentially
the same potential, especially if orthodox medicine used the best of
the alternative cancer treatments. But a medical doctor stands at
risk of losing their medical license, and possibly going to jail,
should they use the most effective cancer treatments, either
orthodox or alternative. Thus, going with orthodox cancer treatments
is almost always a mistake, because of the corruption in modern
medicine.
6)
Thus, for a newly diagnosed cancer patient, because they have the
option to use alternative cancer treatments, and the freedom to do
their homework on the Internet and in the right books, their only
hope of achieving a high chance of survival is to use alternative
cancer treatments.
In
short, the war between
alternative cancer treatments and orthodox cancer treatments has
nothing to do with science, it is a war of information and freedom.
From a scientific standpoint, if the right treatment is chosen for a
given situation, and the patient avoids orthodox medicine (except in
rare situations), because of the corruption of orthodox medicine,
alternative cancer treatments are far superior. But the side that
wins the most cancer patients is the side with the most money.
In
other words, because they are corrupt, Big Pharma and Big Medicine
have the most money and the most influence over the media (who are
essentially owned and controlled by the same people who own and
control the pharmaceutical industry), thus almost all newly
diagnosed cancer patients choose the worst possible option because
the media has suppressed the truth, deceived them into thinking
current orthodox medicine is wonderful and brainwashed them into
picking their worst possible option.
Medicine is not a "healing art," it is a business. Their goal is not
to cure people, but to maximize their profits. Cancer is one of the
key diseases that is a "goose that lays golden eggs" for orthodox
medicine. No one wants to kill that goose.
More than one million Americans die every year of cancer, heart
disease, diabetes, etc., when they could have been cured or their
disease could easily have been prevented. Instead of being told the
truth, the truth is suppressed and replaced with false hopes,
deceptive statistics and pressure.
God will judge those who are responsible and God cannot be bribed.
Part 2 of this article will go into great detail about the "Great
Deception" and Part 3 of this article will detail the politics
involved in the Great Deception.
Note:
A superb new book, released in August, 2006, covers many of the
topics on this website, and many issues not on this website. The
book is called: Cancer - Step Outside the Box, by
researcher Ty Bollinger. It is recommended both for cancer patients
and as a gift to others to help spread the word about the
effectiveness of alternative cancer treatments. The ideal scenario
is for someone to know about alternative cancer treatments before
they are diagnosed with cancer, so they won't be pressured into
making the wrong decision. The book is available on Amazon. See
also:
Cancer - Step Outside the Box
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.
This article may be downloaded, stored on the internet, printed, or
emailed to others,
as long as it is not modified in any way and this copyright notice
remains intact.
|
