Home-Wellness Directory

Cartoon of the Year:
Licensed to Pill


Support this Site

Google


WWW Wellness Directory

 

CURRENT ISSUE

Lawsuit Update
It's pretty much over.

Dr Sam Chachua Update
The doctor with the ONLY working AIDS vaccine.

Miracle Cure for Alcoholism
A reader's story.

Science Project Demonstrates Just How Dangerous Microwaved Food Can Be
As if you have to be told again?

The Global Citizen: Monsanto and Fox and Consumers' Right to Know
Better living thru chemistry.

MSG - it's Everywhere
And you thought only Chinese food had it.

Rise in Mental Illness Linked to Unhealthy Diets, Say Studies
Gee, and what have we been telling you?

Omegasentials Baking Contest
I'm going to give the prize to myself if someone doesn't send us their recipe.

Vitamins and Supplements Are Poisonous and Will Kill You!!!!!!
Yah, right.

Hastert, Frist Said to Rig Bill for Drug Firms
Oh those crazy politicians. How they love to pander to the drug companies.

More NSAIDs Problems
Have we told you of safe alternatives?

Reviews
A movie, a web site, and a tea.

Tidbits
Many sent to us by our readers and an update from the Organic Consumer's Association.

Lafter is the Best Medicine
So a monk, a pirate, and a rabbi go into a bar...

ALERT NETWORK

E-mail Address:


Become a Health-Freedom Fighter. When action is needed, we will notify you immediately.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search Now:  

Amazon Logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ultimate Immune
Everything you'll need for the cold and flu season.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder if all those people with magnetic ribbons on the back of their cars and vans that show their support for our troops know that there are now homeless Iraqi vets.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Cancer's Natural Enemy

$12.95

 

 


Collected Home & Herbal Remedies
$7.95

 

 

Purchase Both
$15.95


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sedona Labs Probiotics
at Simply the Best

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.whitehouse.org/includes/redirect.asp?url=http://www.cafepress.com/angrytown/420356?pid=74&image=/images/gs/angrytown.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lawsuit Update
What we've learned.
 Printer Friendly Page

The lawsuit is ended. It has been dismissed. The plaintiff is a fugitive from justice, according to his attorney. He has 30 days to appeal.

But here is what we've learned:

  • We have over half a million readers, but just under 50 supporters.

  • We are so far in debt that one more lawsuit would wipe us out and shut down the site.

  • Though we get hundreds of letters thanking us for the work we do, we still have to pay the bills.

  • Most of all, there are some really great people in the world who gave more than they could afford to give to fight this injustice.

However, things will have to change around here.

We are going to focus on fundraising. We need to get back into the black and that will be the focus here and our only goal.

This means that less time will be spent writing with more time spent trying to find money.

Grant Writers: we recently put out a feeler for grant writers. We got a letter from one telling us that it is unethical to pay a grant writer a commission, since it will affect the writing. I'm under the impression that it's unethical to pay good money to someone who can't guarantee his work.

We have two possible grant writers who've not done much so far. We are still looking for grant writers. However, now, they will have to be volunteer grant writers.

Fund Raisers: if you know how to do this, then contact us.

We have many projects on the back burners right now, including a Journal of International Medicine. Dr Sam Chachua called me and asked me to edit and publish a peer-review journal called the Journal of International Medicine. Something for both physicians and consumers. This will cost us at least $100,000.00 to get off the ground.

The next edition of the Wellness Directory of Minnesota™ is still on the back burner, and this time we will be publishing a World version, listing naturopaths, and others from around the world. Sadly, our two sales people in charge of selling advertising, haven't brought in a thing in the past two years.

We are currently rewriting our Bypassing Bypass, and our book on Cancer will be updated soon, but that will take even more time and money.

So, this is where we stand. We're over 70K in debt, and trying to dig out. We will still work on the site, but our focus will be to get out of debt and then onto bigger and better things.

If you want to contribute, you know what to do.

Help Out?


Dr Sam Chachua Update
When he's not being attacked physically, he's busy working on healing individuals of the most terrible illnesses affecting mankind.

Top


I got a call one night, while sitting in bed reading one of the 17 books I've been sent to review, and it was Dr Sam on the other end.

He asked me to fly to Haiti to cover a pretty big story. You see, he was going there to administer the only working AIDS vaccine. Dr Sam likes our publication since we are one of two journalists actually writing about him and his therapies, not to mention his trials and tribulations. However, I had to tell him that I was planning on attending a 35 year Vietnam reunion in which I'll see some fellow pilots I flew with way back when. He felt that that was more important.

Sam and his friends (including myself) were recently trying to get in touch with Bill Gates. It seems that Bill has a lot of money invested in an AIDS vaccine. Sam wanted to inform him that his investment will go nowhere; that that particular AIDS vaccine will not only not work, it will probably do a lot of harm in the long run.

Having our ear to the ground, we've heard about many vaccines that have come to naught. We heard about the World Health Organization going into a village in a remote part of Africa to administer an AIDS vaccine, and upon returning to that village, they found everyone dead.

The problem with the current AIDS vaccines is, Dr Sam told me, "super-infection."

You see, there are many strains of the HIV virus. Clubs have been established for people living with HIV and when they share bodily fluids, they each infect the other with their particular form of HIV. So, now you have a "super-infection."

The current AIDS vaccines are doing that too.

Dr Sam has the ONLY working HIV vaccine in the world.

Dr Sam was recently in China to attend a fund raiser for the Bird Flu. When he spoke, the audience responded favorably. He told them that first the world has to realize the cycle of the flu; that when it's in the birds, it's not in humans, and when it's in humans, it's not in the birds. So, he asked them, "Why are you vaccinating birds."

He then questioned the killing and burning of sick birds. The virus is destroyed by cooking, so why not just eat the birds?

"And if you really want to just end the flu, add a bit of BHT to their feed."

That night Dr Sam was visited by the Chinese Secret Police. They roughed him up a bit, confiscated his passport, and when exiting, reminded him that "you don't come to a fund raiser with a cure."

Dr Sam had to ask the African Embassy to help him get out of China.

And finally, Dr Sam has asked me to edit and publish a new peer-review journal called the Journal of International Medicine. He said that this will be slightly different, in that all the articles will focus on

  • Theory

  • Experimentation

  • Clinical Trials

Dr Sam will create the review board. It is my job to find subscribers and contributors. And then to edit and publish it.

This is going to cost money.

So, we are looking now for donations. And for each $50.00 you donate, you will get a year's subscription to the Journal of International Medicine when it is published. $100.00 gets you two years. JAMA charged $500.00 for one year, and the New England Journal of Medicine charges $599.00 for one year.

Note that this is for the journal.


Miracle Cure for Alcoholism  

It was complex. My life was falling apart. I had just sold my advertising/p.r. agency, and planned to retire (at 52) but wasn't sure the money would last long enough.

My wife, Miriam, was in deep depression, has been hospitalized twice, was on anti-depressants which didn't seem to be working.

I was pretty depressed myself, dealing with Miriam's depression.

I considered getting a keep-busy job of some kind -- like a security guard -- just to get out of the house, but knew that a heavy drinker my age who was also a smoker was virtually unemployable -- and the Houston economy had cratered when the price of oil cratered.

I enjoyed drinking, and had gotten away with everything just short of murder, but knew it couldn't go on forever. Sooner or later my health would go.

Still, I wouldn't have done anything, except that I stumbled onto this medical doctor who mentioned in passing that he treated alcoholism. I inquired into it, and he did one helluva selling job on me. I figured, what the heck, I'll give it a try.

The rest of the story is attached. I used to have it on a website, but never had any inquiries on it, so took it down. I'm considering putting it back up.

Today is the 23rd anniversary of my life without alcohol. I went from about a fifth of bourbon a day to zero.

Which brings me to the laws of cause and effect.  When I was drinking, I never had any health problems, and never got a parking ticket, let alone a moving violation.

Since I quit boozing I've gotten two speeding tickets, and my blood pressure is high.  I've had four stents put in my arteries, half a dozen skin cancers removed, one of my four parathyroids removed, and my prostate is so large I can hardly pee a stream.

I was better off when I was drinking.  But I wasn't 75 then, either.

Click here to read the article on the Miracle Cure for Alcoholism.


Science Project Demonstrates Just How Dangerous Microwaved Food Can Be

Top

We've written about microwaves in a previous newsletter. One of the first links ever at this site is Hidden Hazards of Microwave Cooking, the report of an actual study that was blocked from publication.

However, out of the mouths of babes, comes the riveting truth. Microwaving your food is deadly. A grade schooler, Arielle Reynolds, did a science project that is just "awesome."

Here is a link to the original site: http://www.execonn.com/sf/ and here is a link to another site containing the results of the experiment: http://www.rense.com/general70/microwaved.htm

If any of these sites goes down, just write, and we will post the web page here at our site.

This science experiment has just been debunked by Snopes dot com. Thanx!

http://www.snopes.com/science/microwave/plants.asp


The Global Citizen: Monsanto and Fox and Consumers' Right to Know
By Donella H. Meadows, AlterNet. Posted April 26, 2000.
 

Top

Go to Original

Well here's a howdy-do. TV station in Florida prepares hard-hitting series questioning safety of grocery-store milk. Large biotech company threatens station with libel suit. Station cancels broadcast, orders reporters to rewrite series. Reporters refuse. Station fires reporters. Reporters sue station.

It's easy to post one of two well-worn headlines over this story -- CORPORATION AND MEDIA CONSPIRE TO HIDE TAINTED MILK FROM PUBLIC or PIT-BULL REPORTERS DISTORT EVIDENCE TO PANIC CONSUMERS. Having talked with the protagonists on both sides, I'm unwilling to jump to either conclusion. I'm reminded of a Jane Austin novel where the plot thickens and no character is flawless -- but the language being used lacks Jane Austin's gentility.

"Some of the points clearly contain elements of defamatory statements which, if repeated in a broadcast, could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire consequences for Fox News."

"We paid $3 billion for these television stations. We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is."

Monsanto has put years and millions into a hormone, which, when injected every two weeks into a cow can raise her milk production by 10-20 percent. Posilac is the trade name; it is also called rBGH (for bovine growth hormone) and rBST (for bovine somatotropin, a name Monsanto made up, critics say, to avoid negative associations with hormones). The "r" stands for "recombinant," because the hormone is produced in vats by bacteria into which a cow gene has been transplanted. The genetic engineering is in the bacteria, not the cows, not the milk.

All along the company has met with resistance to this product. Some people hate the very idea of tinkering with genes. Some are worried about artificially cranking up the metabolism of the cow. (The program quotes a taunt used by critics, "crack for cows," but that is not a good metaphor; rBGH is more like the steroids that Olympic athletes are not allowed to use.) Some say the last thing the glutted U.S. market needs is more milk -- this product does nothing for the consumer, it just helps some farmers beat out other farmers in a cutthroat competition. But the hot-button concern from a marketing point of view is the fear that milk from hormone-injected cows may be harmful to human health.

The squashed series, made by reporters Steve Wilson and Jane Akre for Fox-owned WTVT in Tampa, hits that concern hard. It does quote a Monsanto spokesman who cites the long approval process Posilac had to go through and the assurance of regulators that rBGH-produced milk is indistinguishable from any other. But it quotes rBGH skeptics harder and longer, and, as is typical in TV reporting, one has no idea whether they are representative scientists or a few selected cranks.

Wilson and Akre do document unsettling facts about corporate heavy-handedness, suppressed data, even an attempted bribe of regulatory officials in Canada. (Monsanto claims it was an offer of "research support;" a Canadian official on camera calls it a bribe.) The company does speak in weasel words. ("Every scientific, medical or regulatory body in the world which has reviewed and approved this product has come to the same conclusion: milk from rBST treated cows poses no risk to human health." No mention of the fact that regulatory bodies in Canada, New Zealand, and the European Union, have reviewed and not approved the product.)

The series shows clearly that Florida supermarkets claiming to have rBGH-free milk have taken no steps to assure that result. Monsanto says the claim would be impossible to test, because there is no difference in the milk. But Monsanto's own numbers show elevated hormone levels in rBGH-treated milk, and when I ask about the statistics, I get surprisingly devious answers. I have to conclude that this company has invested so much into its product that it can't see or tell the full truth, even if it wants to.

On the other hand, the reporters, though they've done a lot of research and exposed significant corporate sloppiness, make rBGH-treated milk sound much too ominous. They harp on a possible link with cancer, for instance, which is a long way from proved (or disproved). The WTVT lawyers, scared by a threatening letter from Monsanto's lawyers, went too far in the other direction, however, when they ordered the word "cancer" cut out throughout the series and replaced with "adverse human health effects."

What deeply disturbs me about this story has nothing to do with milk. It has to do with consumers getting straight information. A series on rBGH could have been properly cautionary, but this one was overdramatic, designed to pull in viewers during "sweeps week." On the other hand, it is chilling to know how easily a big company can squelch information. Just two tough-sounding letters and the show is canceled.

It would be nice to live in a world where we could trust the assurances of large corporations, trust public regulators, trust what we see on TV -- but such a world seems increasingly remote. As to trusting the milk supply, I don't think rBGH-treated milk will give us cancer, though I don't know for sure, nor does Monsanto, nor do those hotshot TV producers. Personally I don't want to find out by participating in an experiment conducted upon a poorly informed public, nor am I interested in revving up cows or hooking farmers on an unnecessary product.

Fortunately I do trust a local dairy that does not use rBGH.

(Details on this story, including the TV script before and after editing, can be found at www.foxbghsuit.com. Monsanto's website on Posilac is at www.monsanto.com/protiva/.)

Donella H. Meadows is an adjunct professor of environmental studies at Dartmouth College.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The International Wellness Directory has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is the International Wellness Directory endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on the International Wellness Directory may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
MSG - it's EVERYWHERE
Yup, it's a drug; it's an addictive drug.

Top

Editor's Note: this was sent by a reader, but we found some bits that were not true and had to edit it. Hopefully, the remaining parts are true. If you find something suspicious, please write us: info@mnwelldir.org


Food additive "MSG" is a Slow Poison. Slow Poisoning MSG hides behind 25 or more names, such as "Natural Flavouring".

No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so the scientists have to create them. They make these morbidly obese creatures by injecting them with MSG when they are first born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the pancreas creates; causing rats (and humans?) to become obese. They even have a title for the fat rodents they create: "MSG-Treated Rats".

I was shocked too. I went to my kitchen, checking the cupboards and the fridge. MSG was in everything! The Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays flavoured potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings, especially the 'healthy low fat' ones. The items that didn't have MSG marked on the product label had something called ''Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein'', which is just another name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday are filled with this stuff. They hide MSG under many different names in order to fool those who carefully read the ingredient list, so they don't catch on. (Other names for MSG: 'Accent' - 'Aginomoto' - 'Natural Meet Tenderizer' etc) But it didn't stop there.

When our family went out to eat, we started asking at the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many employees, even the managers, swore they didn't use MSG. But when we ask for the ingredient list, which they grudgingly provided, sure enough MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere. Burger King, McDonalds, Wendy's, Taco Bell, every restaurant, even the sit down ones like TGIF, Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the WORST offender: MSG was in every chicken dish, salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that coating on the skin, their secret spice was MSG!

So why is MSG in so may of the foods we eat?.. Is it a preservative or a vitamin?

Not according to my friend John. In the book he wrote, an exposé of the food additive industry called "The Slow Poisoning of America" he said that MSG is added to food for the addictive effect it has on the human body.

Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG at http://www.msgfactscom/facts/msgfact12.html explains that the reason they add it to food is to make people eat more. A study of the elderly showed that people eat more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate Association lobby group says eating more benefits the elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us? 'Betcha can't eat just one', takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is overweight?

The MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts people to their products. It makes people choose their product over others, and makes people eat more of it than they would if MSG wasn't added.

Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive substance! Since its introduction into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been added in larger and larger doses to the pre-packaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we are tempted to eat everyday. The FDA has set no limits on how much of it can be added to food.

They claim it's safe to eat in any amount. How can they claim it safe when there are hundreds of scientific studies with titles like these?

References:

The monosodium glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT, Ribeiro IA.Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 2002.

Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats. Guimaraes RB, Telles MM, Coelho VB, Mori C, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull.
2002 Aug.

Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: an animal model of multiple risk factors. Iwase M, Yamamoto M, Iino K, Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar.

Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development of obesity. Tanaka K, Shimada M, Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp Neurol. 1978 Oct.


Yes, that last study was not a typo, it WAS written in 1978.

Both the "medical research community" and "food manufacturers" have known about MSG's side effects for decades! Many more studies mentioned in John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes, Migraines and headaches, Autism, ADHD and even Alzheimer's. But what can we do to stop the food manufactures from dumping fattening and addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we now see?

Even as you read this, G. W. Bush and his corporate supporters are pushing a Bill through Congress called the "Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act" also known as the "Cheeseburger Bill", this sweeping law bans anyone from suing food manufacturers, sellers and distributors. Even if it comes out that they purposely added an addictive chemical to their foods. Read about it for yourself at: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/ 2004/03/10/health/main605157.shtml and  www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/20/cheeseburger.bill and news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3500388.stm.

The Bill has already been rushed through the House of Representatives, and is due for the same rubber stamp at Senate level. It is important that Bush and his corporate supporters get it through before the media lets everyone know about "MSG, the intentional Nicotine for food."

Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his concerns to one of the highest government health officials in Canada. While sitting in the Government office, the official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top level government official refused to tell the public what he knew.

The big media doesn't want to tell the public either, fearing legal issues with their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on fast food industry may hurt their profit margin. The food producers and restaurants have been addicting us to their products for years, and now we are paying the price for it. Our children should not be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food additive. But what can I do about it? I'm just one voice.

What can I do to stop the poisoning of our children, while our governments are insuring financial protection for the industry that is poisoning us?

The best way you can help to save yourself and your children from this drug-induced epidemic, is to forward this email to everyone. With any luck, it will circle the globe before politicians can pass the legislation protecting those who are poisoning us. The food industry learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone blew the whistle on Nicotine?

If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG is good for us, and you don't believe what John Erb has to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine, at http://www.pubmed.com. Type in the words "MSG Obese" and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.

We the public, do not want to be rats in one giant experiment and we do not approve of food that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep, feeding the food industry's bottom line, while waiting for the heart transplant, diabetic induced amputation, blindness or other obesity induced, life threatening disorders. With your help we can put an end to this poison. Do your part in sending this message out by word of mouth, e-mail or by distribution of this print-out to all your friends all over the world and stop this "Slow Poisoning of Mankind" by the packaged food industry.

Blowing the whistle on MSG is our responsibility, get the word out.

A great link to peruse is: http://www.msgmyth.com/hidename.htm.


Rise in Mental Illness Linked to Unhealthy Diets, Say Studies
Surprised?

Top

Editor's note: A while back we quoted a professor and medical doctor who taught at a medical school in Texas. He said, "The biggest myth of all is that food has any connection to behavior." We found the story at WebMD.

The biggest myth in medicine is that a physician knows anything about nutrition. For the most part, physicians in the US are not taught nutrition or prevention, but are taught pharmaceutical medicine.
 

Go to Original

Patients benefit by cutting intake of junk food
NHS warned of rise in £100bn bill

Felicity Lawrence
Monday January 16, 2006
The Guardian


Fruit and nuts
Fruit and nuts. Photograph: Frank Baron
 

Changes in diet over the past 50 years appear to be an important factor behind a significant rise in mental ill health in the UK, say two reports published today.

The Mental Health Foundation says scientific studies have clearly linked attention deficit disorder, depression, Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia to junk food and the absence of essential fats, vitamins and minerals in industrialised diets.

A further report, Changing Diets, Changing Minds, is also published today by Sustain, the organisation that campaigns for better food. It warns that the NHS bill for mental illness, at almost £100bn a year, will continue to rise unless the government focuses on diet and the brain in its food, farming, education and environment policies.

"Food can have an immediate and lasting effect on mental health and behaviour because of the way it affects the structure and function of the brain," Sustain's report says. Its chairman, Tim Lang, said: "Mental health has been completely neglected by those working on food policy. If we don't address it and change the way we farm and fish, we may lose the means to prevent much diet-related ill health."

Both reports, which have been produced collaboratively, outline the growing scientific evidence linking poor diet to problems of behaviour and mood. Rates of depression have been shown to be higher in countries with low intakes of fish, for example. Lack of folic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, selenium and the amino acid tryptophan are thought to play an important role in the illness. Deficiencies of essential fats and antioxidant vitamins are also thought to be a contributory factor in schizophrenia.

A pioneering nutrition and mental health programme, thought to be the only one of its kind in Britain, was carried out at Rotherham, South Yorkshire. According to Caroline Stokes, its research nutritionist, the mental health patients she saw generally had the poorest diets she had ever come across. "They are eating lots of convenience foods, snacks, takeaways, chocolate bars, crisps. It's very common for clients to be drinking a litre or two of cola a day. They get lots of sugar but a lot of them are eating only one portion of fruit or vegetable a day, if that."

The therapy includes omega-3 fatty acids and multivitamins, with advice on cutting out junk food and replacing it with oily fish, leafy vegetables for folic acid, Brazil nuts for selenium, and food providing tryptophan.

Some patients who resist treatment with drugs accept nutritional therapy and most have reported an improvement in mood and energy. Ms Stokes said: "Within the first month there's been a significant reduction in depression. We've had letters from [the patients'] psychiatrists saying they can see a huge difference."

One sufferer who benefited from a dietary change was James McLean, who was at university when first diagnosed with bipolar disorder (manic depression). After he had been sectioned repeatedly, his father read about the role of nutrition in mental health. The pair went privately to the Brain Bio Centre, in London, where Mr McLean's nutrient levels were checked; he was allergic to gluten and yeast and was given supplements, including vitamin B and essential fatty acids.

"I'd been eating lots of intense carbohydrate foods ... because they were cheap, and very little fruit or vegetables," Mr McLean said. Now, he excludes wheat from his diet too. He added: "I have more energy and confidence, I sleep better, and I came off the anti-psychotic drugs, although I still take mood stabilising ones."

Andrew McCulloch, chief executive of the Mental Health Foundation, acknowledged that mental illness results from a complex interplay of biological, social, psychological and environmental factors, but thought diet should be an everyday component of mental health care. "It costs £1,000 a week to keep someone in a psychiatric hospital. How much does good food cost? We need mentally healthy school meals, and mentally healthy hospital foods," he said.

Best choices and worst:

Good for the brain:

Vegetables, especially leafy
Seeds and nuts
Fruit
Whole grains
Wheatgerm
Organic eggs
Organic farmed or wild fish, especially fatty fish

Bad for the brain:

Deep fried junk foods
Refined processed foods
Pesticides
Alcohol
Sugar
Tea and coffee
Some additives

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The International Wellness Directory has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is the International Wellness Directory endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on the International Wellness Directory may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Omegasentials Baking Contest
We're sweetening the pot.

Top


We are STILL waiting for entries to this contest. If you don't get us your recipes (and a taste of the sweets) I'm going to give the prize to ME!

We are extending the contest to October. And we're sweetening the pot by offering the winner, not only three bags of Omegasentials, but a copy of Bruce Fife's new book: Coconut Cures.

Our friends at Wilderness Family Naturals who supply us with all our coconut needs just love us and sent us a copy of Coconut Cures not knowing that Bruce Fife had already sent us a copy. So, we'll be passing that onto the winner of the Omegasentials Baking Contest.

You should note that we've changed our recipe for Omega-Muffins just a tad. On the coconut recipe page we substitute Coconut Flour for wheat, and in all our Muffin recipes we've now made the amount of Omegasentials per recipe one and a half cups. This guarantees that each muffin will have a two tablespoons of Omegasentials, the recommended daily amount.

If you've not yet made our Omega-Muffins, you'll never know how good healthy food can taste.


Vitamins and Supplements Are Poisonous and Will Kill You!!!!!!
Yeah, right.

.Top

Attacks on Vitamins and Supplements are getting hot, hotter, and hottest. Why? Well, one reason is that Pharmaceutical companies want us to use drugs instead of things our bodies really need. Another thing is that they want to show us how dangerous these things are so they can outlaw them, make them available by prescription only, and then buy out the companies selling them and get rich by selling you a $15.00 bottle of Vitamin C for $150.00.

Let's get real. Here is something from the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service:

American poison control statistics show that in one year, there were 28 deaths from heroin [in 2005]; acetaminophen (the active ingredient in products like  Tylenol ) killed 147. Though acetaminophen killed over five times as many as an illegal drug, few would say that we should make this generally regarded as safe, over-the-counter pain reliever require prescription.

The biggest lie in medicine is that medicine is better for us than vitamins and supplements and that vitamins and supplements can be dangerous. Yet recently, there have been a spate of articles on how we must take vitamins with care and caution.

On ABC News we find: Daily Dose: Which Vitamins Help, Harm? Here you can learn that Vitamin E causes Congestive Heart Failure. Yeah, right. As we said before, calling synthetic alpha tocopherol Vitamin E is tantamount to calling Textured Vegetable Protein fillet mignon.

Instead of reducing the risk of lung cancer, beta carotene was found to increase the rate of lung cancer in one study of smokers. Another study found that smokers and asbestos-exposed workers, when given doses of beta carotene and vitamin A, had an increased risk of lung cancer, death from cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. The rate of death was so high that the study was stopped early.

As previously reported, this finding was first discovered in a study that was arranged so badly, it's methodology absolutely corrupt, that when discovered it was overlooked because the rest of the findings were so far off. It took years to discover that this is actually true. If you are a smoker, do NOT supplement with Beta Carotene. Or better still, STOP SMOKING.

Again, on ABC News we find Americans may take too many vitamins, experts say.

Funny, but when you want to create a study showing that vitamins are worthless, if you can't use a synthetic form, always give the experimental group the Required Daily Allowance, although we like to call them the Ridiculously Daily Allowance. Under dosing is the best way to prove something is worthless.

My Own Recent Experience

Again, I did not realize I was coming down with a bug. I'm just too proud to admit that I'm human at times. My throat was dry and tickling; my voice became gravelly. I wrote it off as the dryness of the spring and my voice raw from calling the pups.

Soon, I had a fever and a sore throat that just got worse and worse. I was so sick that I went from 50,000 mgs of Vitamin C to 100,000 mgs of Vitamin C. If I had overdosed, I'd get diarrhea. But no, my stool was solid and normal. The sore throat would not go away, and after five days I thought it was time to visit my doctor and see if I'd had something antibiotics would clear up (or should clear up in the case of strep). Tests came back normal. So she said, let's get s liver count and a urine test. I said, What?

Ok, it seems that in a viral attack, it's the kidneys and liver that get the brunt of the attack and they are the first to show damage.

So, I sat there at the VA hospital all day waiting for my tests. The doc stepped into the waiting room and said, "Good news. Your numbers are perfect."

"So, does this mean I'm not sick" I coughed.

"No, it means that whatever you are doing is working. You've got a viral attack, but your body is fighting it off and nothing's been damaged."

That's when I told her I'd been taking 100 grams (that's 100,000 mgs) of Vitamin C.

She said, "Well, don't overdo it."

Funny thing. She tells me what I'm doing is working, but then upon hearing what I'm doing, tells me not to do it. I guess we need to teach our doctors about megadoses of Vitamin C.  

Back To ABC News

Some Vitamins Can Do More Harm Than Good, is the name of the article that starts off: "Vitamins are big business. Americans spend $7 billion a year on them in hopes of warding off colds, cancer and other diseases. But new studies show that high doses often provide no health benefit and can even cause harm."

Funny how ABC, CBS, NBC, and the rest never tell us how Pharmaceuticals are a big business with consumers spending 100s of billions a year only to find themselves hooked on very expensive drugs for life and that life not being of much quality or all that long.

They tell us that Dr David Katz recommends a balanced diet and a multivitamin. They don't tell us what exactly a balanced diet is nor do they tell us that Dr David Katz probably never studied nutrition or vitamin therapy.

He tells us: "New studies have found vitamin C, if taken at the same time a patient is getting certain medical treatments, such as chemo for cancer, can interfere with that treatment."

Funny thing, but with specific alternative therapies, such as Poly MVA or Paw Paw, using Vitamin C will work against the process.

But Dr David Katz apparently did not read Abdellatif, et al. “Vitamin C enhances chemosensitization of esophageal cancer cells in vitro.” J Chemother, 2005;17
(5):539-549.

Dr Katz goes on to say: "When you look at all the literature, it appears that the levels of vitamins in our ancestors' diet was optimal," Katz said. "We can best recreate that by eating a balanced diet supplemented by a multivitamin."

The levels of PCBs, benzene, dioxins, and 75,000 other chemicals in our ancestors' bodies weren't what they are today. The amounts of horemones and antibiotics in our livestock are a bit greater then were in our ancestors' foods.

Our diets aren't even close to our ancestors' diets.

Again, Dr Kats seems to have learned only what he was supposed to learn, and believes only what he's supposed to believe.

As the battle over our health care rights heats up, stay tuned. We'll have the answers to the right wing (yes, the pharmaceutical companies are all right of center -- see below) talking points. 


Hastert, Frist Said to Rig Bill for Drug Firms
By Bill Theobald
The Gannett News Service

Top


Go to Original

Thursday 09 February 2006

Frist denies protection was added in secret.

Washington - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House Speaker Dennis Hastert engineered a backroom legislative maneuver to protect pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits, say witnesses to the pre-Christmas power play.

The language was tucked into a Defense Department appropriations bill at the last minute without the approval of members of a House-Senate conference committee, say several witnesses, including a top Republican staff member.

In an interview, Frist, a doctor and Tennessee Republican, denied that the wording was added that way.

Trial lawyers and other groups condemn the law, saying it could make it nearly impossible for people harmed by a vaccine to force the drug maker to pay for their injuries.

Many in health care counter that the protection is needed to help build up the vaccine industry in the United States, especially in light of a possible avian flu pandemic.

The legislation, called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, allows the secretary of Health and Human Services to declare a public health emergency, which then provides immunity for companies that develop vaccines and other "countermeasures."

Beyond the issue of vaccine liability protection, some say going around the longstanding practice of bipartisan House-Senate conference committees' working out compromises on legislation is a dangerous power grab by Republican congressional leaders that subverts democracy.

"It is a travesty of the legislative process," said Thomas Mann, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.

"It vests enormous power in the hands of congressional leaders and private interests, minimizes transparency and denies legitimate opportunities for all interested parties, in Congress and outside, to weigh in on important policy questions."

At issue is what happened Dec. 18 as Congress scrambled to finish its business and head home for the Christmas holiday.

That day, a conference committee made up of 38 senators and House members met several times to work out differences on the 2006 Defense Department appropriations bill.

Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., the ranking minority House member on the conference committee, said he asked Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, the conference chairman, whether the vaccine liability language was in the massive bill or would be placed in it.

Obey and four others at the meeting said Stevens told him no. Committee members signed off on the bill and the conference broke up.

A spokeswoman for Stevens, Courtney Boone, said last week that the vaccine liability language was in the bill when conferees approved it. Stevens was not made available for comment.

During a January interview, Frist agreed. Asked about the claim that the vaccine language was inserted after the conference members signed off on the bill, he replied: "To my knowledge, that is incorrect. It was my understanding, you'd have to sort of confirm, that the vaccine liability which had been signed off by leaders of the conference, signed off by the leadership in the United States Senate, signed off by the leadership of the House, it was my understanding throughout that that was part of that conference report."

But Keith Kennedy, who works for Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., as staff director for the Senate Appropriations Committee, said at a seminar for reporters last month that the language was inserted by Frist and Hastert, R-Ill., after the conference committee ended its work.

"There should be no dispute. That was an absolute travesty," Kennedy said at a videotaped Washington, D.C., forum sponsored by the Center on Congress at Indiana University.

"It was added after the conference had concluded. It was added at the specific direction of the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate. The conferees did not vote on it. It's a true travesty of the process."

After the conference committee broke up, a meeting was called in Hastert's office, Kennedy said. Also at the meeting, according to a congressional staffer, were Frist, Stevens and House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

"They (committee staff members) were given the language and then it was put in the document," Kennedy said.

About 10 or 10:30 p.m., Democratic staff members were handed the language and told it was now in the bill, Obey said.

He took to the House floor in a rage. He called Frist and Hastert "a couple of musclemen in Congress who think they have a right to tell everybody else that they have to do their bidding."

Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., also was critical of inserting the vaccine language after the conference committee had adjourned.

"It sucks," he told Congress Daily that night.

Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., another member of the conference committee, was upset, too, a staff member said, because he didn't have enough time to read the language. The final bill was filed in the House at 11:54 p.m. and passed 308-102 at 5:02 the next morning.

The Senate unanimously approved the legislation Dec. 21, but not before Senate Democrats, including several members of the conference committee, bashed the way the vaccine language was inserted.

"What an insult to the legislative process," said Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., a member of the conference committee. Byrd is considered the authority on legislative rules and tradition.

President Bush signed the legislation into law Dec. 30.

When asked about Frist's earlier denial, spokeswoman Amy Call said: "Bill Frist has fought hard to protect the people of Tennessee and the people of the United States from a bioterror emergency and that's what he did throughout this process."

Hastert's office did not provide a response.

Not against the Rules

The practice of adding to a compromise bill worked out by bipartisan House-Senate conference committees, while highly unusual, is not thought to violate congressional rules.

Some Senate and House Democrats have proposed banning the practice as part of broader attempts at ethics reform in Congress.

They, consumer groups and others with concerns about possible harm caused by vaccines charge that the move was a gift by Frist to the pharmaceutical industry, which they point out has given a lot of campaign cash to the Nashville doctor through the years.

"The senator should be working to ensure there are safe vaccines to protect American families rather than protecting the drug industry's pocketbooks," Pamela Gilbert, president of Protect American Families, said in a statement. The group is an alliance of consumer, labor and advocacy organizations.

Frist has received $271,523 in campaign donations from the pharmaceutical and health products industry since 1989, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a watchdog group.

He is also a possible candidate for president in 2008.

In the interview, Frist reiterated how important he thinks the vaccine protections are.

"The United States of America, if a pandemic occurs, is totally unprepared," he said. "And the only way we are going to be prepared is rebuilding our manufacturing base to build a vaccine infrastructure that can be timely and responsive. We don't have it today."

Frist has long advocated liability protection for vaccine makers, and it was widely reported that he would attempt to attach the legislation to the Defense Appropriations bill because it is considered must-pass legislation.

Ken Johnson, senior vice president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said that, while the group favors liability protection, it did not take a position nor did it lobby on behalf of the law that passed.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The International Wellness Directory has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is the International Wellness Directory endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on the International Wellness Directory may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
More NSAIDs Problems
When a good drug goes bad.

Top

The latest problem to arise from the use (over-use) of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was recently found in men over 45.

In a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, 72,000 men over the age of 45 who took NSAIDs on a regular basis more than doubled their risk of getting acute urinary retention (AUR). The higher their use of the NSAID, the greater their risk.

You do not want AUR. You just can't urinate and it's painful. You'll need a catheter, and that's painful too.

So, when you have that pain, you might wish to try an alternative. Please read our article on chronic inflammation for a complete list of alternatives (which will be updated as we find more).

[Verhamme KM, et al. "Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and increased risk of acute urinaryretention." Arch Intern Med. 2005]


Reviews
A movie, a web site, and a tea.

Top

We got a copy of the movie Side Effects and LOVED it. Go Here.

Then Heartland Products sent us some wonderful natural products to review. If you want some great safe soap or products to rid yourself of pests that won't poison your family, then go Here.

Finally, we've been sent two forms of Jiaogulan tea, China's Immortality Herb. To read about them, go Here.


Tidbits
Many sent to us by our readers.

Top

__________________________________



 
WTO TO EUROPEANS: EAT YOUR FRANKENFOODS
The World Trade Organization (WTO), responding to intense pressure from the Bush Administration and the biotech industry, has ruled that the European Union's (EU) moratorium on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from 1998-2004 was illegal. The moratorium was put in place because of EU concerns on human safety, environmental pollution, and inadequate testing, and has subsequently been officially lifted. Canada and Argentina backed the U.S. in filing a complaint with the WTO in 2003, alleging that the moratorium was a violation of international trade laws. The Bush Administration has claimed that the EU ban has hurt U.S. farmers who grow genetically engineered crops, and that the EU should pay hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties to the U.S. But market analysts point out that the WTO ruling will not benefit the biotech industry, because EU food manufacturers and supermarket chains, fearing a consumer backlash, will continue to refuse to sell food products containing GMOs, no matter what the WTO says. U.S. Trade officials have admitted that the main impact of the WTO ruling will be to intimidate smaller nations from banning GMOs.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/ruling060208.cfm

____________________________________


image parody
by Michael Gibbs

 
BIG BROTHER WANTS TO TRACK ANIMALS AND THEIR OWNERS
Plans for a system that would require tagging or implanting all farm animals with radio frequency devices and registering those animals with a federal government tracking system have been delayed until after 2009, the USDA announced last week. The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) has been gaining support in the corporate agribusiness world, supposedly as a method for sourcing the origins of Mad Cow disease or possible terrorist biological attacks on the nation's livestock. Opponents point out the plan was drawn up by corporate behemoths like Monsanto and would require every owner of even a single animal to register their home with a national tracking system, including Global Positing Coordinates (for satellite tracking) and implant or tag every animal with a radio frequency device (RFID). Large-scale livestock producers say NAIS would help them control an outbreak of disease by allowing individual animals to be tracked to their origins. Small-scale farmers say the registration fees, RFID expenses and administrative bureaucracy of the system would drive them out of business. The USDA announced a delay in the launch of the program last week, based on disputes in the cattle industry over who gets control of the overall database. The OCA is in the process of building an online NAIS information and action center to help citizens educate themselves and offer feedback to the USDA on the NAIS issue.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ofgu/ID060202.cfm

____________________________________



QUICK FACTS ON BOTTLED WATER VERSUS CLEANING UP THE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
  • Members of the United Nations estimate that if the world took half of what it currently spends on bottled water ($100 billion annually) and invested it in water infrastructure and treatment, everyone in the world could have access to clean drinking water.
  • But bottled water is cleaner, right? Actually, the U.S. EPA sets more stringent quality standards for tap water than the FDA does for bottled beverages, and roughly 40% of bottled water is actually just tap water.
  • 1.5 billion barrels of oil are consumed each year to produce the plastic for water bottles, enough to fuel 100,000 cars.
  • According to the Container Recycling Institute, only 14 percent of plastic water bottles are recycled.
  • A water bottle in a landfill or lying around as litter will take over 1,000 years to biodegrade.
     

http://www.organicconsumers.org/foodsafety/Bottled020606.cfm

 

 

___________________________________


image parody
 
A MENTALLY UNSTABLE DIET: DON'T PANIC GO ORGANIC
A new report from the Mental Health Foundation indicates that dietary changes over the last fifty years have played a negative role in human mental health. Industrial agriculture has introduced pesticides and altered the body fat composition of animals due to the diets they are now fed. As a result, the population's intake of omega-3 fatty acids has decreased, and the consumption of omega-6 fatty acids has increased. According to the study, this unequal intake, combined with a lack of vitamins and minerals, is associated with depression, concentration and memory problems. Dr Andrew McCulloch, chief executive of the Mental Health Foundation, said, "We are well aware of the effect of diet upon our physical health. But we are only just beginning to understand how the brain as an organ is influenced by the nutrients it derives from the foods we eat and how diets have an impact on our mental health." http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/diet060202.cfm

____________________________________


photo parody
DEMAND INCREASING FOR CAGE-FREE EGGS
A national food service distributor to more than 200 college and corporate cafeterias across the U.S. has announced it will begin to provide only cage-free eggs. Responding to a petition by students at the American University in Washington, D.C., Bon Appetit will discontinue purchasing conventional eggs. According to the Humane Society, laying hens are the most abused animals in agribusiness. Up to eight birds are squeezed into a single cage, forcing each bird to live out its life in a space about half the size of a sheet of computer paper. Birds' beaks are clipped off to keep them from attacking each other in these cramped quarters, and cages are stacked so that birds living below other cages are literally rained on with defecation from their upstairs neighbors. Bon Appetit's decision is particularly significant, given that the company purchases eight million eggs per year, and cage-free eggs are more expensive. The company hopes prices will drop with increased demand. Bon Appetit already buys rBGH-free milk and antibiotic-free meat. http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/eggs060201.cfm

 

____________________________________


photo parody
THE JOYS OF PENALTY FREE POLLUTION
Owners of corporate factory farms are celebrating after being let off the hook for polluting the environment. The EPA, ignoring massive public opposition, has approved a Bush Administration proposal that allows factory farms to freely violate clean air standards for the next four years. The deal will also forgive these same polluters from paying millions of dollars in fines for past air pollution violations. In exchange for the freedom to pollute, the deal requires that factory farms agree to allow the EPA to monitor their air pollution. The regulation will exonerate more than 6,700 factory farms from having to pay fines of up to $27,500 per day for violating clean air standards in the past and over the next four years. The EPA claims this arrangement is needed in order to gather data necessary to further refine air emissions regulations for egg, chicken, turkey, dairy and hog industries. According to the EPA's rule, the main goal of this regulation is to "reduce air pollution."
http://www.organicconsumers.org/epa4.htm

 

Quickies...

ALERT: Public comments are currently being taken on whether the EPA should register the carcinogen methyl iodide as a legal pesticide (Feb. 21 deadline). EPA has indicated it would allow farmers to apply up to 400 lbs. of the carcinogenic chemical to each acre. Unlike many other pesticides, methyl iodide vaporizes quickly, causing it to drift far distances. Although the state of California has categorized it as cancer causing, and the EPA admits it causes thyroid tumors, the chemical is on the verge of being given the green light by the EPA for widespread use on tomatoes, strawberries, peppers, tobacco, melons, potatoes and other root crops. Send a quick message to the EPA here, advising them to start promoting safe methods of food production. Take action:
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2488
----------------
A new study by John Hopkins University has found a chemical pollutant from the production of grease-proof food wrapping and Teflon (PFOA) in the umbilical chords of nearly every baby tested. The test found that 298 out of 300 blood samples from umbilical chords tested positive for PFOA, which has been categorized as a likely carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board. The EPA has also accused DuPont of covering up a 1981 study that found PFOA passed from DuPont's pregnant employees to fetuses. Late last year, DuPont agreed to pay a record $10.25 million fine for failing to tell the EPA about its studies that found PFOA to be "extremely toxic".
http://www.organicconsumers.org/toxic/teflon2.cfm
----------------