Ultimate Immune Everything you'll need for the cold and
flu season.
I
wonder if all those people with magnetic ribbons on the back
of their cars and vans that show their support for our
troops know that there are now homeless Iraqi vets.
The lawsuit is
ended. It has been dismissed. The plaintiff is a fugitive
from justice, according to his attorney. He has 30 days
to appeal.
But here is what
we've learned:
We have over
half a million readers, but just under 50
supporters.
We are so far
in debt that one more lawsuit would wipe us out and
shut down the site.
Though we get
hundreds of letters thanking us for the work we do,
we still have to pay the bills.
Most of all,
there are some really great people in the world who
gave more than they could afford to give to fight
this injustice.
However, things
will have to change around here.
We are going to
focus on fundraising. We need to get back into the black and
that will be the focus here and our only goal.
This means that
less time will be spent writing with more time spent
trying to find money.
Grant Writers:
we recently put out a feeler for grant writers. We
got a letter from one telling us that it is unethical to
pay a grant writer a commission, since it will affect
the writing. I'm under the impression that it's
unethical to pay good money to someone who can't
guarantee his work.
We have two
possible grant writers who've not done much so far. We
are still looking for grant writers. However, now, they
will have to be volunteer grant writers.
Fund Raisers:
if you know how to do this, then contact us.
We have many
projects on the back burners right now, including a
Journal of International Medicine. Dr Sam Chachua called
me and asked me to edit and publish a peer-review
journal called the Journal of International Medicine.
Something for both physicians and consumers. This will
cost us at least $100,000.00 to get off the ground.
The next edition
of the Wellness Directory of Minnesota™ is still on the
back burner, and this time we will be publishing a World
version, listing naturopaths, and others from around the
world. Sadly, our two sales people in charge of selling
advertising, haven't brought in a thing in the past two
years.
We are currently
rewriting our Bypassing Bypass, and our book on Cancer
will be updated soon, but that will take even more time
and money.
So, this is where
we stand. We're over 70K in debt, and trying to dig out.
We will still work on the site, but our focus will be to
get out of debt and then onto bigger and better things.
If you want to
contribute, you know what to do.
Help Out?
Dr Sam
Chachua Update When he's not being
attacked physically, he's busy working on
healing individuals of the most terrible
illnesses affecting mankind.
I got a call one night, while sitting in bed
reading one of the 17 books I've been sent to
review, and it was Dr Sam on the other end.
He asked
me to fly to Haiti to cover a pretty big story.
You see, he was going there to administer the
only working AIDS vaccine. Dr Sam likes our
publication since we are one of two journalists
actually writing about him and his therapies,
not to mention his trials and tribulations.
However, I had to tell him that I was planning
on attending a 35 year Vietnam reunion in which
I'll see some fellow pilots I flew with way back
when. He felt that that was more important.
Sam and
his friends (including myself) were recently
trying to get in touch with Bill Gates. It seems
that Bill has a lot of money invested in an AIDS
vaccine. Sam wanted to inform him that his
investment will go nowhere; that that particular
AIDS vaccine will not only not work, it will
probably do a lot of harm in the long run.
Having our
ear to the ground, we've heard about many
vaccines that have come to naught. We heard
about the World Health Organization going into a
village in a remote part of Africa to administer
an AIDS vaccine, and upon returning to that
village, they found everyone dead.
The
problem with the current AIDS vaccines is, Dr
Sam told me, "super-infection."
You see,
there are many strains of the HIV virus. Clubs
have been established for people living with HIV
and when they share bodily fluids, they each
infect the other with their particular form of
HIV. So, now you have a "super-infection."
The
current AIDS vaccines are doing that too.
Dr Sam has
the ONLY working HIV vaccine in the world.
Dr Sam was
recently in China to attend a fund raiser for
the Bird Flu. When he spoke, the audience
responded favorably. He told them that first the
world has to realize the cycle of the flu; that
when it's in the birds, it's not in humans, and
when it's in humans, it's not in the birds. So,
he asked them, "Why are you vaccinating birds."
He then
questioned the killing and burning of sick
birds. The virus is destroyed by cooking, so why
not just eat the birds?
"And if
you really want to just end the flu, add a bit
of BHT to their feed."
That night
Dr Sam was visited by the Chinese Secret Police.
They roughed him up a bit, confiscated his
passport, and when exiting, reminded him that
"you don't come to a fund raiser with a cure."
Dr Sam had
to ask the African Embassy to help him get out
of China.
And
finally, Dr Sam has asked me to edit and publish
a new peer-review journal called the Journal of
International Medicine. He said that this will
be slightly different, in that all the articles
will focus on
Theory
Experimentation
Clinical Trials
Dr Sam
will create the review board. It is my job to
find subscribers and contributors. And then to
edit and publish it.
This is
going to cost money.
So, we are
looking now for donations. And for each $50.00
you donate, you will get a year's subscription
to the Journal of International Medicine when it
is published. $100.00 gets you two years. JAMA
charged $500.00 for one year, and the New
England Journal of Medicine charges $599.00 for
one year.
It was complex. My life was falling
apart. I had just sold my advertising/p.r. agency, and
planned to retire (at 52) but wasn't sure the money
would last long enough.
My wife,
Miriam, was in deep depression, has
been hospitalized twice, was on anti-depressants which
didn't seem to be working.
I was pretty depressed myself, dealing
with Miriam's depression.
I considered getting a keep-busy job
of some kind -- like a security guard -- just to get out
of the house, but knew that a heavy drinker my age who
was also a smoker was virtually unemployable -- and the
Houston economy had cratered when the price of oil
cratered.
I enjoyed drinking, and had gotten
away with everything just short of murder, but knew it
couldn't go on forever. Sooner or later my health would
go.
Still, I wouldn't have done anything,
except that I stumbled onto this medical doctor who
mentioned in passing that he treated alcoholism. I
inquired into it, and he did one helluva selling job on
me. I figured, what the heck, I'll give it a try.
The rest of the story is attached. I
used to have it on a website, but never had any
inquiries on it, so took it down. I'm considering
putting it back up.
Today is the 23rd anniversary
of my life without alcohol. I went from about a
fifth of bourbon a day to zero.
Which brings me to the laws of
cause and effect. When I was drinking, I never
had any health problems, and never got a parking
ticket, let alone a moving violation.
Since I quit boozing I've
gotten two speeding tickets, and my blood
pressure is high. I've had four stents put in
my arteries, half a dozen skin cancers removed,
one of my four parathyroids removed, and my
prostate is so large I can hardly pee a stream.
I was better off when I was
drinking. But I wasn't 75 then, either.
However, out of
the mouths of babes, comes the riveting truth.
Microwaving your food is deadly. A grade schooler,
Arielle Reynolds, did a science project that is just
"awesome."
Well here's a
howdy-do. TV station in Florida prepares hard-hitting
series questioning safety of grocery-store milk. Large
biotech company threatens station with libel suit.
Station cancels broadcast, orders reporters to rewrite
series. Reporters refuse. Station fires reporters.
Reporters sue station.
It's easy to post one of two well-worn headlines over
this story -- CORPORATION AND MEDIA CONSPIRE TO HIDE
TAINTED MILK FROM PUBLIC or PIT-BULL REPORTERS DISTORT
EVIDENCE TO PANIC CONSUMERS. Having talked with the
protagonists on both sides, I'm unwilling to jump to
either conclusion. I'm reminded of a Jane Austin novel
where the plot thickens and no character is flawless --
but the language being used lacks Jane Austin's
gentility.
"Some of the points clearly contain elements of
defamatory statements which, if repeated in a broadcast,
could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire
consequences for Fox News."
"We paid $3 billion for these television stations. We
will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell
you it is."
Monsanto has put years and millions into a hormone,
which, when injected every two weeks into a cow can
raise her milk production by 10-20 percent. Posilac is
the trade name; it is also called rBGH (for bovine
growth hormone) and rBST (for bovine somatotropin, a
name Monsanto made up, critics say, to avoid negative
associations with hormones). The "r" stands for
"recombinant," because the hormone is produced in vats
by bacteria into which a cow gene has been transplanted.
The genetic engineering is in the bacteria, not the
cows, not the milk.
All along the company has met with resistance to this
product. Some people hate the very idea of tinkering
with genes. Some are worried about artificially cranking
up the metabolism of the cow. (The program quotes a
taunt used by critics, "crack for cows," but that is not
a good metaphor; rBGH is more like the steroids that
Olympic athletes are not allowed to use.) Some say the
last thing the glutted U.S. market needs is more milk --
this product does nothing for the consumer, it just
helps some farmers beat out other farmers in a cutthroat
competition. But the hot-button concern from a marketing
point of view is the fear that milk from
hormone-injected cows may be harmful to human health.
The squashed series, made by reporters Steve Wilson and
Jane Akre for Fox-owned WTVT in Tampa, hits that concern
hard. It does quote a Monsanto spokesman who cites the
long approval process Posilac had to go through and the
assurance of regulators that rBGH-produced milk is
indistinguishable from any other. But it quotes rBGH
skeptics harder and longer, and, as is typical in TV
reporting, one has no idea whether they are
representative scientists or a few selected cranks.
Wilson and Akre do document unsettling facts about
corporate heavy-handedness, suppressed data, even an
attempted bribe of regulatory officials in Canada.
(Monsanto claims it was an offer of "research support;"
a Canadian official on camera calls it a bribe.) The
company does speak in weasel words. ("Every scientific,
medical or regulatory body in the world which has
reviewed and approved this product has come to the same
conclusion: milk from rBST treated cows poses no risk to
human health." No mention of the fact that regulatory
bodies in Canada, New Zealand, and the European Union,
have reviewed and not approved the product.)
The series shows clearly that Florida supermarkets
claiming to have rBGH-free milk have taken no steps to
assure that result. Monsanto says the claim would be
impossible to test, because there is no difference in
the milk. But Monsanto's own numbers show elevated
hormone levels in rBGH-treated milk, and when I ask
about the statistics, I get surprisingly devious
answers. I have to conclude that this company has
invested so much into its product that it can't see or
tell the full truth, even if it wants to.
On the other hand, the reporters, though they've done a
lot of research and exposed significant corporate
sloppiness, make rBGH-treated milk sound much too
ominous. They harp on a possible link with cancer, for
instance, which is a long way from proved (or
disproved). The WTVT lawyers, scared by a threatening
letter from Monsanto's lawyers, went too far in the
other direction, however, when they ordered the word
"cancer" cut out throughout the series and replaced with
"adverse human health effects."
What deeply disturbs me about this story has nothing to
do with milk. It has to do with consumers getting
straight information. A series on rBGH could have been
properly cautionary, but this one was overdramatic,
designed to pull in viewers during "sweeps week." On the
other hand, it is chilling to know how easily a big
company can squelch information. Just two tough-sounding
letters and the show is canceled.
It would be nice to live in a world where we could trust
the assurances of large corporations, trust public
regulators, trust what we see on TV -- but such a world
seems increasingly remote. As to trusting the milk
supply, I don't think rBGH-treated milk will give us
cancer, though I don't know for sure, nor does Monsanto,
nor do those hotshot TV producers. Personally I don't
want to find out by participating in an experiment
conducted upon a poorly informed public, nor am I
interested in revving up cows or hooking farmers on an
unnecessary product.
Fortunately I do trust a local dairy that does not use
rBGH.
(Details on this story, including the TV script before
and after editing, can be found at www.foxbghsuit.com.
Monsanto's website on Posilac is at www.monsanto.com/protiva/.)
Donella H. Meadows is an adjunct professor of
environmental studies at Dartmouth College.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. The
International Wellness Directory has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is
the
International Wellness Directory
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to
our readers and allow for verification of authenticity.
However, as originating pages are often updated by their
originating host sites, the versions posted on the
International Wellness Directory may not match the
versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to
Original" links.
MSG - it's
EVERYWHERE Yup, it's a drug; it's
an addictive drug.
Editor's Note:
this was sent by a reader, but we found some bits that
were not true and had to edit it. Hopefully, the
remaining parts are true. If you find something
suspicious, please write us:
info@mnwelldir.org
Food additive "MSG" is a Slow Poison. Slow Poisoning MSG
hides behind 25 or more names, such as "Natural
Flavouring".
No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so the
scientists have to create them. They make these morbidly
obese creatures by injecting them with MSG when they are
first born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the
pancreas creates; causing rats (and humans?) to become
obese. They even have a title for the fat rodents they
create: "MSG-Treated Rats".
I was shocked too. I went to my kitchen, checking the
cupboards and the fridge. MSG was in everything! The
Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays
flavoured potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker
Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen
prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings, especially the
'healthy low fat' ones. The items that didn't have MSG
marked on the product label had something called
''Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein'', which is just another
name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was shocking to see
just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday
are filled with this stuff. They hide MSG under many
different names in order to fool those who carefully
read the ingredient list, so they don't catch on. (Other
names for MSG: 'Accent' - 'Aginomoto' - 'Natural Meet
Tenderizer' etc) But it didn't stop there.
When our family went out to eat, we started asking at
the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many employees,
even the managers, swore they didn't use MSG. But when
we ask for the ingredient list, which they grudgingly
provided, sure enough MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable
Protein were everywhere. Burger King, McDonalds,
Wendy's, Taco Bell, every restaurant, even the sit down
ones like TGIF, Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG
in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the
WORST offender: MSG was in every chicken dish, salad
dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that
coating on the skin, their secret spice was MSG!
So why is MSG in so
may of the foods we eat?.. Is it a preservative or a
vitamin?
Not according to my friend John. In the book he wrote,
an exposé of the food additive industry called "The
Slow Poisoning of America" he said that MSG is added
to food for the addictive effect it has on the human
body.
Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food
manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG at
http://www.msgfactscom/facts/msgfact12.html explains
that the reason they add it to food is to make people
eat more. A study of the elderly showed that people eat
more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate
Association lobby group says eating more benefits the
elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us? 'Betcha
can't eat just one', takes on a whole new meaning where
MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is
overweight?
The MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts
people to their products. It makes people choose their
product over others, and makes people eat more of it
than they would if MSG wasn't added.
Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity,
it is an addictive substance! Since its introduction
into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has
been added in larger and larger doses to the
pre-packaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we are
tempted to eat everyday. The FDA has set no limits on
how much of it can be added to food.
They claim it's safe to eat in any amount. How can they
claim it safe when there are hundreds of scientific
studies with titles like these?
References:
The monosodium
glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of
exercise in obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT,
Ribeiro IA.Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 2002.
Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic
serotonin release in both normal and monosodium
glutamate-obese rats. Guimaraes RB, Telles MM, Coelho
VB, Mori C, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull.
2002 Aug.
Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate
treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: an animal
model of multiple risk factors. Iwase M, Yamamoto M,
Iino K, Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima
Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar.
Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium
glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development
of obesity. Tanaka K, Shimada M, Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp
Neurol. 1978 Oct.
Yes, that last study was not a typo, it WAS written in
1978.
Both the "medical
research community" and "food manufacturers" have known
about MSG's side effects for decades! Many more studies
mentioned in John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes,
Migraines and headaches, Autism, ADHD and even
Alzheimer's. But what can we do to stop the food
manufactures from dumping fattening and addictive MSG
into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we
now see?
The Bill has already been rushed through the House of
Representatives, and is due for the same rubber stamp at
Senate level. It is important that Bush and his
corporate supporters get it through before the media
lets everyone know about "MSG, the intentional Nicotine
for food."
Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his
concerns to one of the highest government health
officials in Canada. While sitting in the Government
office, the official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG
is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top level
government official refused to tell the public what he
knew.
The big media doesn't want to tell the public either,
fearing legal issues with their advertisers. It seems
that the fallout on fast food industry may hurt their
profit margin. The food producers and restaurants have
been addicting us to their products for years, and now
we are paying the price for it. Our children should not
be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food
additive. But what can I do about it? I'm just one
voice.
What can I do to stop the poisoning of our children,
while our governments are insuring financial protection
for the industry that is poisoning us?
The best way you can help to save yourself and your
children from this drug-induced epidemic, is to forward
this email to everyone. With any luck, it will circle
the globe before politicians can pass the legislation
protecting those who are poisoning us. The food industry
learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big
tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone
blew the whistle on Nicotine?
If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG
is good for us, and you don't believe what John Erb has
to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of
Medicine, at
http://www.pubmed.com. Type in the words "MSG Obese"
and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.
We the public, do not want to be rats in one giant
experiment and we do not approve of food that makes us
into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep,
feeding the food industry's bottom line, while waiting
for the heart transplant, diabetic induced amputation,
blindness or other obesity induced, life threatening
disorders. With your help we can put an end to this
poison. Do your part in sending this message out by word
of mouth, e-mail or by distribution of this print-out to
all your friends all over the world and stop this "Slow
Poisoning of Mankind" by the packaged food industry.
Blowing the whistle on MSG is our responsibility, get
the word out.
Editor's note: A while back we quoted a professor and
medical doctor who taught at a medical school in Texas.
He said, "The biggest myth of all is that food has any
connection to behavior." We found the story at WebMD.
The biggest myth in medicine is
that a physician knows anything about nutrition. For the
most part, physicians in the US are not taught nutrition
or prevention, but are taught pharmaceutical medicine.
Patients
benefit by cutting intake of junk food
NHS warned of rise in £100bn bill
Felicity Lawrence
Monday January 16, 2006
The Guardian
Fruit and nuts. Photograph: Frank Baron
Changes in diet over the past 50 years
appear to be an important factor behind a significant
rise in mental ill health in the UK, say two reports
published today.
The Mental Health Foundation says
scientific studies have clearly linked attention deficit
disorder, depression, Alzheimer's disease and
schizophrenia to junk food and the absence of essential
fats, vitamins and minerals in industrialised diets.
A further report, Changing Diets,
Changing Minds, is also published today by Sustain, the
organisation that campaigns for better food. It warns
that the NHS bill for mental illness, at almost £100bn a
year, will continue to rise unless the government
focuses on diet and the brain in its food, farming,
education and environment policies.
"Food can have an immediate and lasting
effect on mental health and behaviour because of the way
it affects the structure and function of the brain,"
Sustain's report says. Its chairman, Tim Lang, said:
"Mental health has been completely neglected by those
working on food policy. If we don't address it and
change the way we farm and fish, we may lose the means
to prevent much diet-related ill health."
Both reports, which have been produced
collaboratively, outline the growing scientific evidence
linking poor diet to problems of behaviour and mood.
Rates of depression have been shown to be higher in
countries with low intakes of fish, for example. Lack of
folic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, selenium and the amino
acid tryptophan are thought to play an important role in
the illness. Deficiencies of essential fats and
antioxidant vitamins are also thought to be a
contributory factor in schizophrenia.
A pioneering nutrition and mental health
programme, thought to be the only one of its kind in
Britain, was carried out at Rotherham, South Yorkshire.
According to Caroline Stokes, its research nutritionist,
the mental health patients she saw generally had the
poorest diets she had ever come across. "They are eating
lots of convenience foods, snacks, takeaways, chocolate
bars, crisps. It's very common for clients to be
drinking a litre or two of cola a day. They get lots of
sugar but a lot of them are eating only one portion of
fruit or vegetable a day, if that."
The therapy includes omega-3 fatty acids
and multivitamins, with advice on cutting out junk food
and replacing it with oily fish, leafy vegetables for
folic acid, Brazil nuts for selenium, and food providing
tryptophan.
Some patients who resist treatment with
drugs accept nutritional therapy and most have reported
an improvement in mood and energy. Ms Stokes said:
"Within the first month there's been a significant
reduction in depression. We've had letters from [the
patients'] psychiatrists saying they can see a huge
difference."
One sufferer who benefited from a dietary
change was James McLean, who was at university when
first diagnosed with bipolar disorder (manic
depression). After he had been sectioned repeatedly, his
father read about the role of nutrition in mental
health. The pair went privately to the Brain Bio Centre,
in London, where Mr McLean's nutrient levels were
checked; he was allergic to gluten and yeast and was
given supplements, including vitamin B and essential
fatty acids.
"I'd been eating lots of intense
carbohydrate foods ... because they were cheap, and very
little fruit or vegetables," Mr McLean said. Now, he
excludes wheat from his diet too. He added: "I have more
energy and confidence, I sleep better, and I came off
the anti-psychotic drugs, although I still take mood
stabilising ones."
Andrew McCulloch, chief executive of the
Mental Health Foundation, acknowledged that mental
illness results from a complex interplay of biological,
social, psychological and environmental factors, but
thought diet should be an everyday component of mental
health care. "It costs £1,000 a week to keep someone in
a psychiatric hospital. How much does good food cost? We
need mentally healthy school meals, and mentally healthy
hospital foods," he said.
Best choices and worst:
Good for the brain:
Vegetables, especially leafy
Seeds and nuts
Fruit
Whole grains
Wheatgerm
Organic eggs
Organic farmed or wild fish, especially fatty fish
Bad for the brain:
Deep fried junk foods
Refined processed foods
Pesticides
Alcohol
Sugar
Tea and coffee
Some additives
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. The
International Wellness Directory has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is
the
International Wellness Directory
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to
our readers and allow for verification of authenticity.
However, as originating pages are often updated by their
originating host sites, the versions posted on the
International Wellness Directory may not match the
versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to
Original" links.
Omegasentials Baking Contest
We're sweetening the pot.
We are STILL
waiting for entries to this contest. If you don't get us
your recipes (and a taste of the sweets) I'm going to give
the prize to ME!
We are extending the contest
to October. And we're sweetening
the pot by offering the winner, not only three bags of
Omegasentials, but a copy of Bruce Fife's new book:
Coconut Cures.
Our friends at
Wilderness Family Naturals who supply us with all our
coconut needs just love us and sent us a copy of Coconut
Cures not knowing that Bruce Fife had already sent us a
copy. So, we'll be passing that onto the winner of the
Omegasentials Baking Contest.
You should note that we've
changed our recipe for Omega-Muffins just a tad. On the
coconut recipe
page we substitute
Coconut Flour for wheat, and in all our Muffin recipes
we've now made the amount of Omegasentials per recipe one
and a half cups. This guarantees that each muffin will have
a two tablespoons of
Omegasentials, the recommended daily amount.
If you've not yet made our
Omega-Muffins,
you'll never know how good healthy food can taste.
Vitamins and
Supplements Are Poisonous and Will Kill You!!!!!!
Yeah, right.
Attacks on Vitamins and
Supplements are getting hot, hotter, and hottest. Why?
Well, one reason is that Pharmaceutical companies want
us to use drugs instead of things our bodies really
need. Another thing is that they want to show us how
dangerous these things are so they can outlaw them, make
them available by prescription only, and then buy out
the companies selling them and get rich by selling you a
$15.00 bottle of Vitamin C for $150.00.
Let's get real.
Here is something from the Orthomolecular Medicine News
Service:
American poison control statistics
show that in one year, there were 28 deaths from
heroin [in 2005]; acetaminophen (the active
ingredient in products like Tylenol ) killed 147.
Though acetaminophen killed over five times as many
as an illegal drug, few would say that we should
make this generally regarded as safe,
over-the-counter pain reliever require prescription.
The
biggest lie in medicine is that medicine is better for
us than vitamins and supplements and that vitamins and
supplements can be dangerous. Yet recently, there have
been a spate of articles on how we must take vitamins
with care and caution.
On
ABC News we find:
Daily Dose: Which Vitamins Help, Harm? Here you can
learn that Vitamin E causes Congestive Heart Failure.
Yeah, right. As we said before, calling synthetic alpha
tocopherol Vitamin E is tantamount to calling Textured
Vegetable Protein fillet mignon.
Instead of reducing the risk of
lung cancer, beta carotene was found to increase the
rate of lung cancer in one study of smokers. Another
study found that smokers and asbestos-exposed
workers, when given doses of beta carotene and
vitamin A, had an increased risk of lung cancer,
death from cardiovascular disease and overall
mortality. The rate of death was so high that the
study was stopped early.
As
previously reported, this finding was first discovered
in a study that was arranged so badly, it's methodology
absolutely corrupt, that when discovered it was
overlooked because the rest of the findings were so far
off. It took years to discover that this is actually
true. If you are a smoker, do NOT supplement with Beta
Carotene. Or better still,
STOP SMOKING.
Funny, but when
you want to create a study showing that vitamins are
worthless, if you can't use a synthetic form, always
give the experimental group the Required Daily
Allowance, although we like to call them the
Ridiculously Daily Allowance. Under dosing is the best
way to prove something is worthless.
My Own
Recent Experience
Again, I did
not realize I was coming down with a bug. I'm just too
proud to admit that I'm human at times. My throat was
dry and tickling; my voice became gravelly. I wrote it
off as the dryness of the spring and my voice raw from
calling the pups.
Soon, I had a
fever and a sore throat that just got worse and worse. I
was so sick that I went from 50,000 mgs of Vitamin C to
100,000 mgs of Vitamin C. If I had overdosed, I'd get
diarrhea. But no, my stool was solid and normal. The
sore throat would not go away, and after five days I
thought it was time to visit my doctor and see if I'd
had something antibiotics would clear up (or should
clear up in the case of strep). Tests came back normal.
So she said, let's get s liver count and a urine test. I
said, What?
Ok, it seems
that in a viral attack, it's the kidneys and liver that
get the brunt of the attack and they are the first to
show damage.
So, I sat there
at the VA hospital all day waiting for my tests. The doc
stepped into the waiting room and said, "Good news. Your
numbers are perfect."
"So, does this
mean I'm not sick" I coughed.
"No, it means
that whatever you are doing is working. You've got a
viral attack, but your body is fighting it off and
nothing's been damaged."
That's when I
told her I'd been taking 100 grams (that's 100,000 mgs)
of Vitamin C.
She said,
"Well, don't overdo it."
Funny thing.
She tells me what I'm doing is working, but then upon
hearing what I'm doing, tells me not to do it. I guess
we need to teach our doctors about megadoses of Vitamin
C.
Back To ABC
News
Some Vitamins Can Do More Harm Than Good, is the
name of the article that starts off: "Vitamins are big
business. Americans spend $7 billion a year on them in
hopes of warding off colds, cancer and other diseases.
But new studies show that high doses often provide no
health benefit and can even cause harm."
Funny how ABC,
CBS, NBC, and the rest never tell us how Pharmaceuticals
are a big business with consumers spending 100s of
billions a year only to find themselves hooked on very
expensive drugs for life and that life not being of much
quality or all that long.
They tell us
that Dr David Katz recommends a balanced diet and a
multivitamin. They don't tell us what exactly a balanced
diet is nor do they tell us that Dr David Katz probably
never studied nutrition or vitamin therapy.
He tells us:
"New studies have found vitamin C, if taken at the same
time a patient is getting certain medical treatments,
such as chemo for cancer, can interfere with that
treatment."
Funny thing,
but with specific alternative therapies, such as Poly
MVA or Paw Paw, using Vitamin C will work against the
process.
But Dr David
Katz apparently did not read Abdellatif, et al. “Vitamin
C enhances chemosensitization of esophageal cancer cells
in vitro.” J Chemother, 2005;17
(5):539-549.
Dr Katz goes on
to say: "When you look at all the literature, it appears
that the levels of vitamins in our ancestors' diet was
optimal," Katz said. "We can best recreate that by
eating a balanced diet supplemented by a multivitamin."
The levels of
PCBs, benzene, dioxins, and 75,000 other chemicals in
our ancestors' bodies weren't what they are today. The
amounts of horemones and antibiotics in our livestock
are a bit greater then were in our ancestors' foods.
Our diets
aren't even close to our ancestors' diets.
Again, Dr Kats
seems to have learned only what he was supposed to
learn, and believes only what he's supposed to believe.
As the battle
over our health care rights heats up, stay tuned. We'll
have the answers to the right wing (yes, the
pharmaceutical companies are all right of center -- see
below) talking points.
Hastert, Frist Said to Rig Bill for
Drug Firms
By Bill Theobald
The Gannett News Service
Washington - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House
Speaker Dennis Hastert engineered a backroom legislative
maneuver to protect pharmaceutical companies from
lawsuits, say witnesses to the pre-Christmas power play.
The
language was tucked into a Defense Department
appropriations bill at the last minute without the
approval of members of a House-Senate conference
committee, say several witnesses, including a top
Republican staff member.
In an
interview, Frist, a doctor and Tennessee Republican,
denied that the wording was added that way.
Trial
lawyers and other groups condemn the law, saying it
could make it nearly impossible for people harmed by a
vaccine to force the drug maker to pay for their
injuries.
Many in
health care counter that the protection is needed to
help build up the vaccine industry in the United States,
especially in light of a possible avian flu pandemic.
The
legislation, called the Public Readiness and Emergency
Preparedness Act, allows the secretary of Health and
Human Services to declare a public health emergency,
which then provides immunity for companies that develop
vaccines and other "countermeasures."
Beyond
the issue of vaccine liability protection, some say
going around the longstanding practice of bipartisan
House-Senate conference committees' working out
compromises on legislation is a dangerous power grab by
Republican congressional leaders that subverts
democracy.
"It is a
travesty of the legislative process," said Thomas Mann,
senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington
think tank.
"It vests
enormous power in the hands of congressional leaders and
private interests, minimizes transparency and denies
legitimate opportunities for all interested parties, in
Congress and outside, to weigh in on important policy
questions."
At issue
is what happened Dec. 18 as Congress scrambled to finish
its business and head home for the Christmas holiday.
That day,
a conference committee made up of 38 senators and House
members met several times to work out differences on the
2006 Defense Department appropriations bill.
Rep.
David Obey, D-Wis., the ranking minority House member on
the conference committee, said he asked Sen. Ted
Stevens, R-Alaska, the conference chairman, whether the
vaccine liability language was in the massive bill or
would be placed in it.
Obey and
four others at the meeting said Stevens told him no.
Committee members signed off on the bill and the
conference broke up.
A
spokeswoman for Stevens, Courtney Boone, said last week
that the vaccine liability language was in the bill when
conferees approved it. Stevens was not made available
for comment.
During a
January interview, Frist agreed. Asked about the claim
that the vaccine language was inserted after the
conference members signed off on the bill, he replied:
"To my knowledge, that is incorrect. It was my
understanding, you'd have to sort of confirm, that the
vaccine liability which had been signed off by leaders
of the conference, signed off by the leadership in the
United States Senate, signed off by the leadership of
the House, it was my understanding throughout that that
was part of that conference report."
But Keith
Kennedy, who works for Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., as
staff director for the Senate Appropriations Committee,
said at a seminar for reporters last month that the
language was inserted by Frist and Hastert, R-Ill.,
after the conference committee ended its work.
"There
should be no dispute. That was an absolute travesty,"
Kennedy said at a videotaped Washington, D.C., forum
sponsored by the Center on Congress at Indiana
University.
"It was
added after the conference had concluded. It was added
at the specific direction of the speaker of the House
and the majority leader of the Senate. The conferees did
not vote on it. It's a true travesty of the process."
After the
conference committee broke up, a meeting was called in
Hastert's office, Kennedy said. Also at the meeting,
according to a congressional staffer, were Frist,
Stevens and House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.
"They
(committee staff members) were given the language and
then it was put in the document," Kennedy said.
About 10
or 10:30 p.m., Democratic staff members were handed the
language and told it was now in the bill, Obey said.
He took
to the House floor in a rage. He called Frist and
Hastert "a couple of musclemen in Congress who think
they have a right to tell everybody else that they have
to do their bidding."
Rep. Dan
Burton, R-Ind., also was critical of inserting the
vaccine language after the conference committee had
adjourned.
"It
sucks," he told Congress Daily that night.
Rep. Jim
Moran, D-Va., another member of the conference
committee, was upset, too, a staff member said, because
he didn't have enough time to read the language. The
final bill was filed in the House at 11:54 p.m. and
passed 308-102 at 5:02 the next morning.
The
Senate unanimously approved the legislation Dec. 21, but
not before Senate Democrats, including several members
of the conference committee, bashed the way the vaccine
language was inserted.
"What an
insult to the legislative process," said Sen. Robert
Byrd, D-W.Va., a member of the conference committee.
Byrd is considered the authority on legislative rules
and tradition.
President
Bush signed the legislation into law Dec. 30.
When
asked about Frist's earlier denial, spokeswoman Amy Call
said: "Bill Frist has fought hard to protect the people
of Tennessee and the people of the United States from a
bioterror emergency and that's what he did throughout
this process."
Hastert's
office did not provide a response.
Not
against the Rules
The
practice of adding to a compromise bill worked out by
bipartisan House-Senate conference committees, while
highly unusual, is not thought to violate congressional
rules.
Some
Senate and House Democrats have proposed banning the
practice as part of broader attempts at ethics reform in
Congress.
They,
consumer groups and others with concerns about possible
harm caused by vaccines charge that the move was a gift
by Frist to the pharmaceutical industry, which they
point out has given a lot of campaign cash to the
Nashville doctor through the years.
"The
senator should be working to ensure there are safe
vaccines to protect American families rather than
protecting the drug industry's pocketbooks," Pamela
Gilbert, president of Protect American Families, said in
a statement. The group is an alliance of consumer, labor
and advocacy organizations.
Frist has
received $271,523 in campaign donations from the
pharmaceutical and health products industry since 1989,
according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a
watchdog group.
He is
also a possible candidate for president in 2008.
In the
interview, Frist reiterated how important he thinks the
vaccine protections are.
"The
United States of America, if a pandemic occurs, is
totally unprepared," he said. "And the only way we are
going to be prepared is rebuilding our manufacturing
base to build a vaccine infrastructure that can be
timely and responsive. We don't have it today."
Frist has
long advocated liability protection for vaccine makers,
and it was widely reported that he would attempt to
attach the legislation to the Defense Appropriations
bill because it is considered must-pass legislation.
Ken
Johnson, senior vice president of the Pharmaceutical
Research and Manufacturers of America, said that, while
the group favors liability protection, it did not take a
position nor did it lobby on behalf of the law that
passed.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. The
International Wellness Directory has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is
the
International Wellness Directory
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to
our readers and allow for verification of authenticity.
However, as originating pages are often updated by their
originating host sites, the versions posted on the
International Wellness Directory may not match the
versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to
Original" links.
The latest problem to arise from the use
(over-use) of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was recently found in men over
45.
In a study published in the Archives
of Internal Medicine, 72,000 men over the age of 45 who
took NSAIDs on a regular basis more than doubled their
risk of getting acute urinary retention (AUR). The
higher their use of the NSAID, the greater their risk.
You do not want AUR. You
just can't urinate and it's painful. You'll need a
catheter, and that's painful too.
So, when you have that pain, you might
wish to try an alternative. Please read our article on
chronic inflammation for a complete list of alternatives
(which will be updated as we find more).
[Verhamme KM, et al. "Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs and increased risk of acute urinaryretention."
Arch Intern Med. 2005]
We
got a copy of the movie Side Effects and LOVED it. Go
Here.
Then Heartland Products sent us some wonderful natural
products to review. If you want some great safe soap or
products to rid yourself of pests that won't poison your
family, then go
Here.
Finally, we've been sent two forms of Jiaogulan tea,
China's Immortality Herb. To read about them, go
Here.
WTO TO EUROPEANS: EAT YOUR
FRANKENFOODS
The World Trade Organization (WTO),
responding to intense pressure from
the Bush Administration and the
biotech industry, has ruled that the
European Union's (EU) moratorium on
genetically modified organisms (GMOs)
from 1998-2004 was illegal. The
moratorium was put in place because
of EU concerns on human safety,
environmental pollution, and
inadequate testing, and has
subsequently been officially lifted.
Canada and Argentina backed the U.S.
in filing a complaint with the WTO
in 2003, alleging that the
moratorium was a violation of
international trade laws. The Bush
Administration has claimed that the
EU ban has hurt U.S. farmers who
grow genetically engineered crops,
and that the EU should pay hundreds
of millions of dollars in penalties
to the U.S. But market analysts
point out that the WTO ruling will
not benefit the biotech industry,
because EU food manufacturers and
supermarket chains, fearing a
consumer backlash, will continue to
refuse to sell food products
containing GMOs, no matter what the
WTO says. U.S. Trade officials have
admitted that the main impact of the
WTO ruling will be to intimidate
smaller nations from banning GMOs.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/ruling060208.cfm
____________________________________
image parody
by Michael Gibbs
BIG BROTHER WANTS TO TRACK
ANIMALS AND THEIR OWNERS
Plans for a system that would
require tagging or implanting all
farm animals with radio frequency
devices and registering those
animals with a federal government
tracking system have been delayed
until after 2009, the USDA announced
last week. The National Animal
Identification System (NAIS) has
been gaining support in the
corporate agribusiness world,
supposedly as a method for sourcing
the origins of Mad Cow disease or
possible terrorist biological
attacks on the nation's livestock.
Opponents point out the plan was
drawn up by corporate behemoths like
Monsanto and would require every
owner of even a single animal to
register their home with a national
tracking system, including Global
Positing Coordinates (for satellite
tracking) and implant or tag every
animal with a radio frequency device
(RFID). Large-scale livestock
producers say NAIS would help them
control an outbreak of disease by
allowing individual animals to be
tracked to their origins.
Small-scale farmers say the
registration fees, RFID expenses and
administrative bureaucracy of the
system would drive them out of
business. The USDA announced a delay
in the launch of the program last
week, based on disputes in the
cattle industry over who gets
control of the overall database. The
OCA is in the process of building an
online NAIS information and action
center to help citizens educate
themselves and offer feedback to the
USDA on the NAIS issue.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/ofgu/ID060202.cfm
____________________________________
QUICK FACTS ON BOTTLED WATER
VERSUS CLEANING UP THE DRINKING
WATER SUPPLY
Members of the United Nations
estimate that if the world took
half of what it currently spends
on bottled water ($100 billion
annually) and invested it in
water infrastructure and
treatment, everyone in the world
could have access to clean
drinking water.
But bottled water is cleaner,
right? Actually, the U.S. EPA
sets more stringent quality
standards for tap water than the
FDA does for bottled beverages,
and roughly 40% of bottled water
is actually just tap water.
1.5 billion barrels of oil are
consumed each year to produce
the plastic for water bottles,
enough to fuel 100,000 cars.
According to the Container
Recycling Institute, only 14
percent of plastic water bottles
are recycled.
A water bottle in a landfill or
lying around as litter will take
over 1,000 years to biodegrade.
A MENTALLY UNSTABLE DIET: DON'T
PANIC GO ORGANIC
A
new report from the Mental
Health Foundation indicates that
dietary changes over the last fifty
years have played a negative role in
human mental health. Industrial
agriculture has introduced
pesticides and altered the body fat
composition of animals due to the
diets they are now fed. As a result,
the population's intake of omega-3
fatty acids has decreased, and the
consumption of omega-6 fatty acids
has increased. According to the
study, this unequal intake, combined
with a lack of vitamins and
minerals, is associated with
depression, concentration and memory
problems. Dr Andrew McCulloch, chief
executive of the Mental Health
Foundation, said, "We are well aware
of the effect of diet upon our
physical health. But we are only
just beginning to understand how the
brain as an organ is influenced by
the nutrients it derives from the
foods we eat and how diets have an
impact on our mental health."
http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/diet060202.cfm
____________________________________
photo parody
DEMAND INCREASING FOR
CAGE-FREE EGGS
A national food service
distributor to more than 200
college and corporate cafeterias
across the U.S. has announced it
will begin to provide only
cage-free eggs. Responding to a
petition by students at the
American University in
Washington, D.C., Bon Appetit
will discontinue purchasing
conventional eggs. According to
the Humane Society, laying hens
are the most abused animals in
agribusiness. Up to eight birds
are squeezed into a single cage,
forcing each bird to live out
its life in a space about half
the size of a sheet of computer
paper. Birds' beaks are clipped
off to keep them from attacking
each other in these cramped
quarters, and cages are stacked
so that birds living below other
cages are literally rained on
with defecation from their
upstairs neighbors. Bon
Appetit's decision is
particularly significant, given
that the company purchases eight
million eggs per year, and
cage-free eggs are more
expensive. The company hopes
prices will drop with increased
demand. Bon Appetit already buys
rBGH-free milk and
antibiotic-free meat.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/eggs060201.cfm
____________________________________
photo parody
THE JOYS OF PENALTY FREE
POLLUTION
Owners of corporate factory
farms are celebrating after
being let off the hook for
polluting the environment. The
EPA, ignoring massive public
opposition, has approved a Bush
Administration proposal that
allows factory farms to freely
violate clean air standards for
the next four years. The deal
will also forgive these same
polluters from paying millions
of dollars in fines for past air
pollution violations. In
exchange for the freedom to
pollute, the deal requires that
factory farms agree to allow the
EPA to monitor their air
pollution. The regulation will
exonerate more than 6,700
factory farms from having to pay
fines of up to $27,500 per day
for violating clean air
standards in the past and over
the next four years. The EPA
claims this arrangement is
needed in order to gather data
necessary to further refine air
emissions regulations for egg,
chicken, turkey, dairy and hog
industries. According to the
EPA's rule, the main goal of
this regulation is to "reduce
air pollution."
http://www.organicconsumers.org/epa4.htm
Quickies...
ALERT:
Public comments are
currently being taken on whether the
EPA should register the carcinogen
methyl iodide as a legal pesticide
(Feb. 21 deadline). EPA has
indicated it would allow farmers to
apply up to 400 lbs. of the
carcinogenic chemical to each acre.
Unlike many other pesticides, methyl
iodide vaporizes quickly, causing it
to drift far distances. Although the
state of California has categorized
it as cancer causing, and the EPA
admits it causes thyroid tumors, the
chemical is on the verge of being
given the green light by the EPA for
widespread use on tomatoes,
strawberries, peppers, tobacco,
melons, potatoes and other root
crops. Send a quick message to the
EPA here, advising them to start
promoting safe methods of food
production. Take
action:
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2488
----------------
A new study by John Hopkins
University has found a chemical
pollutant from the production of
grease-proof food wrapping and
Teflon (PFOA) in the umbilical
chords of nearly every baby tested.
The test found that 298 out of 300
blood samples from umbilical chords
tested positive for PFOA, which has
been categorized as a likely
carcinogen by the Environmental
Protection Agency's Science Advisory
Board. The EPA has also accused
DuPont of covering up a 1981 study
that found PFOA passed from DuPont's
pregnant employees to fetuses. Late
last year, DuPont agreed to pay a
record $10.25 million fine for
failing to tell the EPA about its
studies that found PFOA to be
"extremely toxic".
http://www.organicconsumers.org/toxic/teflon2.cfm ----------------