My young grandson called
the other day to wish me Happy Birthday. He asked me how old
I was, and I told him, "62." He was quiet for a moment, and
then he asked, "Did you start at 1?"
For all your coconut products
Fathers
who smoked cigarettes prior to conception were four times
more likely to have a child with
acute myeloid leukemia
than those who refrained from smoking
during this period. There was some increased risk of having
a child with
acute lymphoblastic leukemia
as well.
We
have a gift for all our readers. We’ve taken our book,
Bypassing Bypass,
and put the
contents online, absolutely free. We are currently
rewriting it, and those who have purchased the previous
edition will get the new one free when it comes out. The
updated edition will go on sale as soon as we’re
finished.
You
can find the book, in its chapters, by clicking on
Articles from our
Home Page. They
are right at the top.
We must
interrupt this newsletter for an urgent News
Flash!
The FDA
plans to classify many alternatives as
DRUGS.
If we do
nothing, we have no one to blame but
ourselves.
and now
back to our regularly scheduled
newsletter....
To
kick off this newsletter, we thought we’d report on some
of the latest findings from the American Heart
Association that have been in the news recently.
For
years, women have not been included in studies on heart
disease. One reason is that men have more heart attacks
than women. However, once women were included, it was
quickly discovered that in spite of that fact,
women have a higher death rate than men.
·Heart
disease is the leading killer of women [if you don’t
count medicine itself], killing half a million per year.
·More women
die from cardiovascular disease than all forms of
cancer.
The
American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with
the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have developed
guidelines for preventing cardiovascular disease, some
of which are quite effective while others are simply
bull on a major scale, supporting the theory that
medicine is better for us than proper nutrition. Please
note that like you, we’ve uncovered versions of this
story that don’t seem to mesh at times, so we’ll just
present what we’ve found:
·Women
should be encouraged not to smoke and avoid second hand
smoke.
·Women
should get at least 30 minutes of moderate exercise each
day (brisk walking). One report states that women should
try to do 60 – 90 minutes a day. Yeah. Like this is
going to happen.
·Women
should eat a heart healthy diet that incorporates a
variety of fruits, vegetables, grains, low fat dairy
products, fish (omega-3s), legumes, and sources of
protein that are low in saturated fats.
·Women
should keep their cholesterol levels below 200, with one
report specifically recommending that women keep their,
so-called, bad cholesterol below 70.
Some
of these recommendations are fine, indeed, while some
are just plain nonsense.
For example, a diet of
grains can, for some, be quite dangerous. We have an
inordinate number of individuals in the US who are
sensitive to wheat or gluten. In his book,
Nutrition and Physical Degeneration,
Weston
Price traced the migration of cardiovascular disease
with the introduction of wheat in Europe. Additionally,
most grain foods are dead foods. People with high intake
of breads also have higher rates of cancer. [International
Journal of Cancer, October 20, 2006; Arch Intern
Med, 2006.]
Corn
is a grain, but as you read in our article on
Chronic Inflammation, it is one of the culprits
behind the inflammation, and chronic inflammation is one
of the culprits behind cardiovascular disease.
Women are encouraged to eat fish twice a week or take a
fish oil supplement. Which fish to eat, they don’t tell
you. And no where in the reports was ever mentioned the
Scandinavian secret of eating a hand full of nuts after
a meal (to get your good fats).
First, let’s take a look at the fish highest in your
omega-3s.
Cold
water fish rank higher in omega-3s than warm water fish.
If you bake or poach the fish, it retains more of the
omega-3s than if you fry it in oil. Eating your fish
raw, at a sushi bar, is the best way to get your omega-3
fish oils, period.
Fish
highest in omega-3s are Salmon, cold water tuna (best to
buy a specialty brand that is packed in its own oil),
halibut, shrimp, snapper, and scallops. Interestingly
enough, shrimp is high in saturated fats (cholesterol).
Funny thing, this cholesterol stuff. The benefits of the
omega-3s outweigh the hazards of cholesterol, which, in
this author’s opinion are blown up way out of
proportion.
Finally, there’s the green mussel from New Zealand. The
fatty acids in this little guy have been compared
to ibuprofen for pain relief from arthritis; according to
the experts, it’s 300 times more powerful if taken
over a period of time.
For
those who do not like fish, there are fish oil capsules;
however, you get what you pay for. Pharmaceutical grade
fish oils are the best. What you get at Target or
Wal-Mart might not be the best. There is cod liver oil
in capsules. These caps also contain Vitamin D, which
we’ve written about pretty extensively lately. (Please
take your fish oils with a meal; they’ll work much
better.)
Finally you have
Omegasentials. This is a flax product with fish
added. This is our favorite product and you won’t see my
fridge ever without a bag in there. Flax is another form
of omega-3s, and the human body needs both forms.
One
final note on DHA and EPA, the beneficial fish oils, is
that your probiotics (the good bacteria in your gut)
poop them. So, keeping a healthy dose of good fauna in
your system is also important.
Finally, when we talk about beneficial fats, we can’t
overlook nuts. Walnuts contain beneficial oils, but the
Hazelnut is the hero of the good fat race.
In a
recent study published in the European Journal of
Clinical Nutrition (Sep 2006), participants were put
on a low fat, low cholesterol for four weeks. Then, for
four weeks, the participants ate 40 grams (about 1.5
ounces) of hazelnuts after each meal. The results were
startling. In addition to a 31.8% reduction in
triglycerides, overall cholesterol was reduced by 5.2%
with HDL cholesterol (the “good” kind) rising 12.6%.
These figures are truly impressive.
Makes you wonder why they were overlooked by the AHA/ACC
guidelines.
The
pharmaceutical recommendations will not be printed here.
Read our Cardiovascular Articlesand you will find nutritional therapies that
are better, more effective, and saner than any drug
protocol.
The
recommendations for an aspirin a day seem to have been
proposed without mentioning a recent study that showed
when you come off of aspirin (say prior to a surgery)
your heart attack chances jump through the roof. This
was discovered after doctors who had been telling their
patients to stop their aspirin therapy prior to
surgeries noticed that a lot of them didn’t live long
enough to have the surgery. A cohort study soon proved
that coming off your aspirin therapy was much more
dangerous than the reasons for going on it in the first
place.
The
recommendations also don’t tell you that aspirin therapy
increases your chances for hemorrhagic stroke by some
40%. (You will find the aspirin myths and the dangers of
aspirin in our Cardiovascular
Articles).
And
finally, along with the last recommendation listed above
(concerning vitamins and supplements), another article
we read from the Canadian Broadcasting System:
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_050194656.html
quoted a physician on the use of vitamins and
supplements: “People are wasting their money when they
are looking at it from a cardiac standpoint.”
A
few articles we found were quick to quote recent studies
showing that folic acid doesn’t work as we once thought
it did.
We
also found many studies and articles that still
recommended folic acid.
Again, we must take the stand that until the medical
community stops running studies involving vitamins and
supplements that are designed to fail, whatever modern
medicine has to say about supplements will be suspect.
Folic acid cuts homocysteine levels. Homocysteines cause
cardiovascular disease. The research on Vitamin E is
plain and simple. Vitamin E helps thin our blood. Read
our articles to learn more on Vitamin E and
cardiovascular disease. We’re very tired of doctors
giving us nutritional advice when they’ve never studied
nutrition.
This
same physician, quoted above, went on to say that
“antioxidants from fruits and vegetables are best.” This
is something we happen to agree with, in part.
“Let
your food be your medicine....”
Hippocrates
However, if you’re a jogger or you live in Los Angeles
County, you probably need at least 6,000 milligrams of
vitamin C daily. If you wanted to get this from eating
oranges, according to my calculations, you will need to
eat from 105 to 120 oranges daily.
Again, we have one more reason not to listen to
physicians when they preach on a subject with which they
are totally unfamiliar, nutritional wellness. They’ve
never studied nutrition, and they shouldn’t study it.
They need to stick to medicine.
In
our Cardiovascular Articles, we have nutritional
guidelines for you that came from unbiased research;
guidelines that actually recommend folate and B
vitamins, vitamin C and vitamin E. You will find these
recommendations already in our cardiovascular wellness
articles and they’ve been there since the first day we
published them in 2002. As for an aspirin replacement:
check out the systemic enzymes and our article on the
dangers of aspirin.
All
in all, some of the recommendations are good, some are
silly. Poor red meat is constantly getting a bad rap,
but if you eat grass fed beef that’s not been injected
with hormones, or poisoned with pesticides, or overdosed
in antibiotics, you’ve got the perfect protein.
The
simple fact that chlorinated water was completely
overlooked by this study as a cause of heart disease
(and boy is it), leaves room for speculation and
conspiracy theorists. Chlorinated water should not be
allowed in our country let alone our bodies.
If
women simply increased their activity a little, tossed
out their corn oil and replaced it with coconut oil (for
frying), and increased their antioxidants, B vitamins
and Essential Fatty Acids, we could cut their heart
disease death rates to the lowest in the world.
Wishing you all a happy and healthy heart.
Don't forget to plug in our
site: International Wellness Directory.
The doctors in
the previous article are old school. They want
to promulgate only that vitamins and minerals
are worthless.
There is a new
school of doctors who want us to know that:
Vitamins are POISON!
Ok, let’s take a
look at this.
The Journal of
the American Medical Association (NAMBLA
JAMA) just published a study that came to the
conclusion that vitamin E, A, and beta carotene
will lead to an early demise.
Next time you
tell your doctor you use these, just watch him
tell you about this study.
The study went on
to say that it needs to investigate selenium and
vitamin C further to determine if they have an
effect on mortality.
It was written up
very professionally, using the terminology only
a statistician could possibly understand, but
luckily there are experts in the field who can
see thru the gobbledygook and spot the flaws.
First off, you
must know that this was not an actual study but
rather a meta analysis of many studies. Right
off the bat, this is bad methodology because it
weighs all studies the same no matter the length
of time, the quality of the vitamins, or the
dosages. The key feature here is that the
researchers claim to have used “all” relevant
trials.
Apparently, when
we wrote Bypassing Bypass we found a study these
fellows didn’t that was published in NEJM in
1993 in which nearly 90,000 nurses were divided
into two groups, one that got vitamin E and
another that got a placebo. After two years, the
group receiving the vitamin E had a 40% lower
risk of heart attack. Similar results were
realized in a smaller follow-up study involving
nearly 40,000 men.
Medicos
consistently create studies designed to fail.
They use synthetic “parts” of vitamins (not the
whole complex), and doses small enough to be
meaningless. Sometimes they use the worst
possible vitamins on the market. You’ll
never see a study on vitamins using the
Cadillac of vitamins made by Standard Process
Labs.
I found a
response to this study called:
META-ANALYSIS ON ANTIOXIDANTS PROVIDES MUDDLED
CONCLUSIONS written by the Council for
Responsible Nutrition. It’s worth reading,
because it answers this study line for line. The
highlight is a quotation by Dr Andrew Shao, PhD
when he called the original study a:
“pre-determined conclusion in search of a method
to support it.”
This kind of
research has one overwhelming motivation behind
it: to eventually limit our access to vitamins
and supplements that are cutting into the
profits of medicine and the pharmaceutical
industry.
Look who sponsors
our evening newscasts: drug companies. Since the
doctors who once worked for the tobacco
companies are out of work, ABC news seems to
have hired a few to promote their anti-vitamin
stance. I’m not sure if Dr Beth M. Wicklund, MD
once worked for the tobacco companies, but she’s
certainly picked up their style. She warned
millions of Americans that fat-soluble vitamins
(A, D, E, and K) are stored in our fatty tissues
and can “Lead to toxic buildup in the liver,
brain, and heart.”
I’m not sure if
she learned this in medical school, or just made
it up for the fear effect, but it is pure,
unmitigated bull.
Yes, we store
these longer than water soluble vitamins, but no
one’s ever died from vitamin E toxicity. In
fact, well, let’s shoot a glance at something
from an organization that actually researches
how vitamins are utilized by the body and what
they do for us; an organization based upon the
work of Linus Pauling, a two time Nobel
laureate:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, February
23, 2007
NO DEATHS FROM VITAMINS: Poison Control
Statistics Prove Supplements’ Safety
(OMNS Feb 23, 2007) There was not even one death
caused by vitamins in 2005, according to the
most recent statistics available from the US
National Poisoning and Exposure Database. The
129-page annual report of the American
Association of Poison Control Centers published
in the journal Clinical Toxicology (1) shows
zero deaths from multiple vitamins; zero deaths
from any of the B vitamins; zero deaths from
vitamins A, C, D, or E; and zero deaths from any
other vitamin.
Over half of the U.S. population takes daily vitamin
supplements. Even if each of those people took
only one single tablet per day, that makes
145,000,000 individual doses per day, for a
total of over 53 billion doses annually. Since
many persons take additional vitamins, the
numbers are considerably higher, and the safety
of vitamins all the more remarkable.
Reference:
1. Lai MW, Klein-Schwartz W, Rodgers GC et al.
2005 Annual Report of the American Association
of Poison Control Centers' national poisoning
and exposure database. Clin Toxicol (Phila).
2006; 44(6-7): 803-932. Free download from
http://www.aapcc.org/Annual%20Reports/05report/2005%20Publsihed.pdf
. Vitamins statistics are found in Table 22,
towards the end of the report.
For further reading:
Download any Annual Report of the American
Association of Poison Control Centers from
1983-2005 free of charge at:
http://www.aapcc.org/annual.htm The
"Vitamin" category is usually at the very end of
the report.
Nutritional Medicine is Orthomolecular Medicine
Linus Pauling defined orthomolecular medicine as
"the treatment of disease by the provision of
the optimum molecular environment, especially
the optimum concentrations of substances
normally present in the human body."
Orthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective
nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more
information:
http://www.orthomolecular.org
The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News
Service is a non-profit and non-commercial
informational resource.
Editorial Review Board:
Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D.
Harold D. Foster, Ph.D.
Bradford Weeks, M.D.
Carolyn Dean, M.D., N.D.
Erik Paterson, M.D.
Thomas Levy, M.D., J.D.
Steve Hickey, Ph.D.
So, we’re told
how dangerous vitamins are, but it seems that no
one died last year taking them.
How many died
from pharmaceuticals? Or from
over-the-counter-drugs?
Tylenol kills
over 100 each year. NSAIDS hospitalize nearly
100,000 a year, with a minimum of 30,000 dying.
Very low estimates put pharmaceutical deaths at
200,000, total.
But your doctor
wants you to be careful taking vitamins.
Hmmmm.
Yes, Vitamin A
can kill you if you take too much. How much is
too much? An awful lot.
Dr Allan Spreen, MD tells us that he can
take 10,000 IU of vitamin A safely, but the same
amount of aspirin will kill you.
We know that
smokers shouldn’t take Beta Carotene because
legitimate studies have proven it is deadly
to them. However, we also know they should quit
smoking. Duh.
Oh, and just how
deadly are these vitamins really?
The study ends by
telling us that we need to eat lots of fresh
vegetables and fruits to get our daily vitamins.
Apparently they’re not as deadly in the food we
eat.
Think about it.
Medicine has to tell us that we need our
vitamins, otherwise everyone would know they’re
lying to us. So they tell us to get our vitamins
in our food (which is good advice). But vitamin
therapies are drawing profits away from the
medical industry; so they have to turn around
and tell us that supplementing will kill us.
I wonder if this
logic will ever stimulate medical researchers to
use “real” food derived vitamins in future
studies, rather than the synthetic partials they
use today.
Before I go, I
have to tell you this: I got an interesting
letter from someone asking about an
investigative report on NBC that was based upon
a ConsumerLab report on vitamins. The report
gave high marks to Flintstones Complete because
they contained everything that was on the label,
were chewable, hence easily dissolved, and were
free of impurities.
I wrote back that
I wished ConsumerLabs would stick to testing
toasters and air bags.
Pick up a bottle
of Flintstones Complete, or visit their web site,
and you’ll see that they also contain aspartame,
soybean oil, artificial colors, and trans fats.
They are not complete vitamins in any sense
since all vitamins are complex and most of the
Flintstones Complete ingredients are synthetic.
Sure, it’s good
that someone is out there assaying our vitamins
and minerals to keep the producers honest, but
they are not experts in nutrition and haven’t a
clue as to our bodies’ needs.
Cardio
Briefs A few
studies that might have slipped by under the
radar.
In a recent study
published March 7th
in JAMA, we learned that postmenopausal women,
who have had no signs or symptoms of any
cardiovascular problems are at a greater risk of
death from a cardiovascular event if they have
had even minor abnormalities show up on an
electrocardiogram.
Interestingly
enough, post menopausal women had been studied
previously, but only in comparison to men. This
time, however, they studied women only, and took
into consideration those on HRT, and, guess
what: researchers fond there was a “significant
increase” in coronary disease among those taking
HRT as opposed to a placebo. [http://www.seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Health/2007/7-03-07-OlderWomenWith.htm
]
Planning a heart
attack? Don’t wait for the weekend.
In Brunswick, New
Jersey, researchers discovered that patients
admitted to hospitals on weekends with
cardiovascular issues were more likely to die of
a heart attack than those who were admitted
during the week. Weekend patients were less
likely to receive percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) on admission as well as less
likely to undergo invasive cardiac procedures
than were those arriving on weekdays.
Dr Kotis
concluded, “The increase in mortality, which may
persist for more than a year, could account for
several thousand deaths annually in the U.S.
More appropriate hospital staffing or
regionalization of care of patients with acute
myocardial infarction may prevent some of these
deaths.”
While Drs
Redelmeier and Bell wrote that “clinicians
strive to provide care to patients every day of
the week. Doing so entails effort, and people
who work in hospitals (unlike those in many
other lines of work) are not always compensated
for taking the weekend shift.”
When it comes to
cardiac care, your local hospital might not be
color blind.
A recent study
published in the February 2007 issue of the
medical journal Academic Emergency Medicine
showed that race, gender, and insurance
coverage determines the type and quality of care
you get when admitted to the ER.
The study focused
on patients admitted into the ER complaining of
chest pain. What did the study find?
·
African-American men were 25 to 30% less likely
to receive the tests for coronary artery disease
compared to non-African-Americans.
·All
forms of the tests — electrocardiograms, chest
x-rays, cardiac monitoring, and oxygen
saturation monitoring — have been declining in
use for African-American males.
·
African-American women saw a 5% lesser chance of
getting an electrocardiogram than
non-African-American men.
·
African-American women saw a 17% lesser chance
of receiving cardiac monitoring, a 14% lesser
chance of receiving oxygen saturation
monitoring, and a six percent lesser chance of
receiving a chest x-ray in comparison to
non-African-American men.
·
Patients who did not have private insurance had
a 13% lesser chance of receiving
electrocardiography. Whereas 82% of
non-African-American men with commercial
insurance received electrocardiography.
A recent study
published in the Archives of Internal
Medicine concluded that people who who use
analgesics (pain relievers, commonly called
NSAIDS) regularly had higher blood pressure
rates than those who did not use them regularly.
The industry
apologists tell us that NSAID usage causes salt
retention, but those who have read our
cardiovascular wellness articles already know
that salt alone is not the problem. The problem
is the sodium/potassium ratio, which, in
Celtic
Sea Salt® Brand is
perfect for the human body.
The study went onto single out certain pain
relievers:
When Tylenol was singled out, risk of
hyptertension jumped 34%.
Aspirin? risks jumped 28%.
All other over the counter NSAIDS (ibuprofen,
advil, naproxin, etc) raised your risks of high
blood pressure nearly 40%.
["Frequency of Analgesic Use and Risk of
Hypertension" Archives of Internal Medicine,
Vol. 167, No. 4, 2/26/07,
www.archinte.ama-assn.org]
Anvirzel Update
Many have written to us over the years asking
for an update.
First, we have the story of
Anvirzel™ by the
daughter of Dr Ozel, the inventor of the drug:
The
Story of Anvirzel.
Second, we
have a little more information on the drug,
what's been happening, and it's progress with
the FDA along with input from people working
with their own extracts of the Nerium Oleander
plant:
Anvirzel Update.
Finally,
we have this article on Anvirzel, sent to us by
somebody (however, we forgot who sent it. It is
very close to an article on the Annieapplseed
Project:
http://www.annieappleseedproject.org/anpat51.html,
but Annie says it's not hers.
So, we'll
reprint it and hope we're not infringing upon
anybody's copyrights:
Nerium
Oleander
An aqueous
extract of Nerium Oleander has been patented
internationally as ANVIRZEL ™. (US Patent
#5,135,745) The Nerium Oleander extract used in
the Agaricus OPC proprietary herbal mix is
similar to the ANVIRZEL ™ extract and the
following excerpt is taken from the description
of ANVIRZEL ™ on the Internet:
Extensive
laboratory and clinical experience indicate
both cytotoxic and immunological activities
for the drug. In developing a protocol for
clinical trials, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
states, "It is thought that the
polysaccharides present in ANVIRZEL™ are
capable of activating the immune cells,
which in turn can recognize the epitopes
present on the cancer cell surfaces, thereby
enhancing the efficacy of the immune
response. It is believed that the cytotoxic
action present in the extract may be
essential for synergistic activities. It is
believed that the cytotoxic action both
arrests tumor growth and prevents cancer
cell reproduction as well as having and/or
producing a Tumor Necrosis Factorlike
activity. Research has proved conclusively
that Anvirzel™ is active on dual pathways at
the cellular level to both inhibit the
growth of tumor cells (through the
antiangiogenesis activity of the oleandrin)
and to promote apoptosis of the tumor cells.
Extensive in
vitro research has been conducted by Dr. Robert
Newman, Chief of Pharmacology, M.D. Anderson
Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas. Dr.
Newman has tested ANVIRZEL™. against a broad
spectrum of human malignant cell lines, and has
demonstrated that ANVIRZEL™ has a high order of
efficacy.
In addition
to the research being conducted by M.D. Anderson
Cancer Center, concurrent research is being
conducted by Dr. Wendell Winters, a noted
immunologist with the University of Texas Health
Science Center in San Antonio,Texas. Dr.
Winter's work has confirmed that ANVIRZEL™ has
been "shown to stimulate the immune system by
stimulation of the function and capability of
specific subsets of mononuclear cells." In
addition, Dr. Winters' research has shown that
ANVIRZEL™ specifically stimulates T and B
lymphocytes, the cell-mediated and the humoral
mediated immune systems.
In April
2000, a USFDA approved study entitled "Phase I
Study of ANVIRZEL™ in Patients with Advanced
Solid Tumors" was commenced under the direction
of Ronald Buckowski, M.D. at Cleveland Clinic in
Cleveland, Ohio.
Because of
its strong cytotoxic effect in combination with
an equally strong immunomodulatory effect,
ANVIRZEL™ is indicated as a therapy, both
primary and adjuvant, for cell proliferative
disease (cancer), certain viral disease, and
autoimmune/inflammatory disease. Clinical
application of ANVIRZEL™ in the United States,
Ireland, and Honduras has demonstrated efficacy
against various neoplastic disease, hepatic
disease such as Hepatitis C, late and early
stage HIV/AIDS, as well as
autoimmune/inflammatory disease such as
rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. The results
have been determined both by the clinical
practitioner and independent laboratory analysis
using PET, CT scan, MRI, and hematological
screening.
International Clinical Experience Using
ANVIRZEL™ Therapy International clinicians have
been treating patients suffering from the above
referenced disorders on a compassionate use
basis since 1997. Many of these patients were
previously diagnosed as terminal. These
clinicians have experienced a very high level of
success with disease stabilization, partial
remission, and complete remission, almost always
accompanied by a very marked improvement in the
patients' quality of life.
Dr. Anibal
Villatoro of Tegucigalpa, Honduras, Former
Executive Director of the Honduran Institute of
Social Security (administrator of the public
health system) has since January of 1999 been
conducting a compassionate use trial with
ANVIRZEL™ for HIV (SIDA) patients in
Tegucigalpa. His early results indicate a strong
level of response to ANVIRZEL™ therapy with a
feeling of homeostasis (feeling of well being)
and an improved quality of life, as well as
significant improvement in their immune systems.
(Reports that slipped out in late 1999 showed
that Anvirzel reversed AIDS, no matter what the
phase of the disease, arthritis, psoriasis,
hepatitis C, and even diabetes in some cases.
Initially, Anvirzel was thought to work only on
cancers found early, however, very positive
results have been found in people given just
weeks to live. To top this all off, Anvirzel
seems to be the first cancer remedy to show
positive results for leiomyosarcoma, probably
the deadliest of cancers. Anvirzel also crosses
the blood-brain barrier (like Poly-MVA) and
gives hope to people with brain tumors.)
The "Common
Thread" running through almost all of the
clinical records of the patient population using
ANVIRZEL™ on a compassionate use basis has been
the marked improvement in the "quality of life"
of those patients. This includes, but is not
limited to, homeostasis, marked improvement in
pain management with elimination of or marked
reduction in use of analgesics, positive
response to antibiotics, increased appetite with
concomitant weight gain, and increase in energy
with reduction of fatigue.
Toxicity
studies. A toxicity study was performed by
Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL, on
28 beagle dogs, and the study states, "No
clinical signs of toxicity were noted in any of
the dogs in this study..." Another lethality
assessment of ANVIRZEL™ in a murine (laboratory
mouse) population was conducted by Southwest
Research Institute, San Antonio, TX., and the
study states, "On the day of NOI (Nerium
Oleander Extract Injectible) administration and
over a subsequent 14 day post dose period, none
of the treated animals showed any pathological
signs or ill effect of the injections as
assessed by daily morbidity and mortality
observations."
No reports
of toxicity have been received from clinicians
supervising patients experiencing Anvirzel™
therapy.
After
publishing our last newsletter, in which we discussed
this new immune booster EpiCor, I got about four letters
in the first week telling me, hey, if this comes from
their products, wouldn't it be cheaper to buy a fifty
pound bag of their fermented yeast product than buy a
bottle of pills that lasts a month?
Well,
that's exactly what I thought, and I went right out and
ordered a fifty pound bag of Diamond V XPC.
Like
everything else I get, the first thing I put the XPC
into was a smoothie. It's not very good tasting.
However, I'm now giving it to my chickens and my dogs.
As for me, I'm still using it in my smoothies, but I've
started adding it to our super muffin recipes.
The
first thing we created after the last newsletter, was a
brand new muffin we called: The Most Expensive Muffins
in the World. This was because we calculated that the
cost of all ingredients added up to about $2.75 cents
per muffin. Because of all the ingredients we put into
the muffins, we called them Longevity Muffins.
For
those of you who want to try the Diamond V XPC but don't
want to have to buy a fifty pound bag for $90.00, for a
fifteen dollar donation to this web site, I will share
with you some from my own personal supply of the Diamond V XPC
and mail it to you. Having said this, I make no promises
concerning the benefits of XPC and if you're sick, go
find a health care professional.
Ahhhhgggg! Boy, did
we get mail! Ron wants to thank all those who bought his
products over the holiday season, and into the new year.
He's been surprising buyers with free lip balm, that he
makes only for friends and family.
“It’s time
consuming and expensive,” Ron told me. “But for your
readers, I'm gonna send them a little gift if they order
two or more products.” [Update Nov 07: The free gift
offer has ended, and Ron thanks all those who have
ordered his amazing products.]
Already people are
telling us their experiences. A woman with diabetic
sores that responded to nothing, suddenly healed in just
under three weeks with HealonPF. One person sent
for a bottle of HealonPF for hemorrhoids, got such quick
relief, that she quickly ordered two more bottles, one
for a friend. Two people reported that the swelling from
spider bites (brown recluse) went down within hours from
applying the HealonPF.
Those using the
lip balm tell us that it's perfect on their crow's feet.
And the number of
people who wrote us that the SugarFoot is the best thing
they've ever found for dry, cracking skin. However, to
get to the root of dry cracking skin, increase your
vitamin E (mixed tocopherols and mixed tocotrienols),
your omega-3s, and keep your probiotics in your gut
flourishing.
A few people have
inquired into selling Ron's products under their own
label, and as always, they would really like to know how
to make them. Ron has told me that he's more then
willing to give out the formulas, but that those who put
them together won't get even half the healing power of
his products, because of the ingredients.
Not all ingredients
are created equally. For example, take a trip over the
web searching for Tea Tree oil. You'll find retail
prices anywhere from $.68/per ounce to $4.95/ounce. Then
you have to ask yourself, how much did the distributor
pay for the original Tea Tree oil.
Ron pays his
supplier $3.80 per ounce for his own Tea Tree oil that
has been distilled according to his strict instructions.
Because they have to maintain temperature stability, it
has to be made in very small batches. Ron won't sell you
his Tea Tree Oil at all. It's his proprietary product.
So, knowing how to make Ron's formulas, doesn't do you
any good without Ron's proprietary ingredients.
Once again, every
first aid kit should have a bottle of HealonPF. There is
no expiration date on the bottle. Bottles that are 7 and
8 years old show no signs of breaking down. And if you
need it, then you'd better have it on hand.
We will post before
and after pictures when they start coming in. If you have
your own, feel free to send them to us.
info@mnwelldir.org
For Ron Salley's
Miracle Skin products, please visit
Simply
the Best.
This is the real
thing. No fruit juice added, no preservatives added,
just pure noni juice from the fruit and leaves. And,
it’s organic.
That is ALL we can
tell you now, because now that we’ve found a source that
is really, really good, we’re going to do some more
research.
Here are some
highlights of the research we will be publishing at this
site: Costa Rican noni has a more vitamin C than noni
from Tahiti. Noni not only boosts the immune system,
it’s an antioxidant, an anti-inflammatory, an
antiangiogenic agent (stops the growth of new blood
vessels to a tumor), and an analgesic (pain killer).
We also received
notice that only this noni was given as therapy to a
breast cancer patient, and she is now in remission.
Editor's note:
the FDA is finally addressing the issue of conflicts of
interest. Sure, as you'll read below these are pretty
half-assed gestures, but they are a start in the right
direction after millions have died from pharmaceuticals.
10 of the 30 people who voted to pass Vioxx had taken
money from the makers of Vioxx.
In today's New York
Times, there appears a story by reporter Gardiner Harris
about FDA's new guidance intending to reduce conflicts
of interest on agency advisory boards. (Note: The story
refers to the proposal as "rules" but it is actually
"draft guidance" which, unlike rules/regulations, does
not carry the force of law.)
The guidance is a response to an increasing problem at
FDA: Scientists determining the public safety of drugs
and medical devices often have financial ties to the
products or industry on which they are commenting. There
are pros and cons to the draft guidance.
The good:
Most advisors
having obvious financial conflicts of interest of
more than $50,000 will not be able to serve on
committees.
Most advisors
with less significant conflicts of interest will be
able to serve but not vote.
The guidance
addresses not just current financial conflicts of
interest, but those that have occurred in the past
year.
The bad:
The guidance is
loaded with loopholes, including reserving the right
of the FDA commissioner to grant waivers.
The guidance
only addresses financial conflicts of interest, not
personal or professional. (This is politics!
Relationships and egos are important.)
This is
guidance, not a regulation. Therefore, it "does not
operate to bind FDA or the public."
The ugly:
An advisor with
a significant financial conflict of interest may
still be able to serve (but not vote) if "the need
for the individual's services outweigh the potential
for a conflict of interest." Doesn't a big pile of
cash undermine the objectivity of an "expert?"
Shouldn't pharmaceutical expertise funded by a
pharmaceutical company be considered ill-gotten
gains?
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. The
International Wellness Directory has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is
the
International Wellness Directory
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to
our readers and allow for verification of authenticity.
However, as originating pages are often updated by their
originating host sites, the versions posted on the
International Wellness Directory may not match the
versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to
Original" links.
Open
Letter to
Congress and
Presidential Candidates
"The penalty that good men pay
for not being interested in politics is to be
governed by men worse than themselves." Abraham
Lincoln
Editor's Note: Health Care is political. I have been
very active politically for many years. The following
letter has been sent to all my congress-people, and to
many candidates for office. Feel free to copy it and
send it to your people in congress and your favorite
candidate.
The last time I
checked, the World Health Organization ranked our health
care system 37th
in the world. We are ranked 20th
in infant mortality. We are ranked 20th
in longevity. However, our health care system is ranked
the 1st
(highest) in cost.
An estimated 200,000
Americans are killed yearly by prescription drugs;
300,000 more die from hospital errors, infections picked
up in hospitals, malpractice, and mistakes. Many of
these figures have been published in JAMA and the New
England Journal of Medicine, and are, admittedly, low
estimates.
With such a poor
health care system, I find it astonishing that
politicians feel that the main problem with our
health care is that too many people still do not have
access to it.
This kind of logic
is reminiscent of that Woody Allen joke where two women
are in a restaurant and one says to the other, “The food
in here is awful,” to which her friend responds, “Yes,
and such small portions.”
The plain truth
about our health care system is that it is a disease
care system whose bottom line is the almighty
dollar. It is fraught with fraud, redundancy, and just
plain bad science. Where our health care system excels
is in trauma care and diagnostics.
Those famous tobacco
industry scientists who for years told us tobacco was
not detrimental to our health have gone to work for the
AMA and now tell us that vitamins and supplements are
worthless, and that real health demands drugs. Our
health care is founded on the science of the lowest
bidder: if we grease enough palms, doctors will say
anything.
Medicine is a
powerful monopoly. Doctors, drug companies, and the FDA
are all in bed together. This is not an empty attack; it
is not a conspiracy theory; it’s simply the goal of
every monopoly: to crush the competition and gain market
share; it’s just business as usual.
Before we can have
universal health care, we must first create real
health care. We have to rid the system of fraud.
We can cut our
health care costs 9 billon dollars overnight by
outlawing cholesterol lowering drugs.
I’ve spent years
researching cholesterol, and there is not one
study that has shown that cholesterol causes heart
disease. All cholesterol lowering drugs, until the
recent Statin drugs, shortened life spans. Statin drugs
have extended life spans because they are also
anti-inflammatories; expensive anti-inflammatories that
could be replaced by Boswellia, an herb from the rain
forest that costs $12 per bottle, or replaced by
aspirin; although, it is not my personal choice.
Our elderly are
drugged into oblivion. Visit any elderly care site and
you’ll not find a single individual on fewer then three
drugs with far too many are on five to fifteen drugs.
Once you put a person on three or more drugs, all double
blind studies go out the window. No one can tell you the
overall results of overmedicating. This is quackery.
This is a
terrible problem. We might have a cure for cancer
but no one can profit from it. That’s a terrible
problem, because who will spend the billion dollars
required to prove this drug?
The problem is we
have a health care industry that profits from our being
ill, not from our being healthy. If we are healthy, the
industry suffers.
And yet congress
keeps funding pharmaceutical companies and their
research.
It is time to cut
corporate welfare to the pharmaceutical industry and put
that money into our universities. Universities can test
cheap alternatives objectively; therapies that
can profit no one but can save countless lives. We must
study and test non patentable therapies, or we’ll have
just more of the same: expensive, dangerous medicine
that might just kill more people than it cures.
The problem with our
health care system is not that people don’t have access
to it. The problem is that our health care system has
nothing to do with health.
The primary
objective of our medical schools is to teach physicians
to fix disease. Our medical schools know nothing about
health and wellness, and thus our physicians know
nothing about health and wellness. Our health care
system is diseased from the start; it is a disease care
system.
We are what we eat,
breathe, drink, and think. Any physician who does not
believe this is not a healer. Any person who does not
believe this is deluded. Any politician who does not
believe this does not have a health care solution, and
universal health care is just corporate welfare and an
empty election promise.
Editor's Note:
Meet Dr Al Sears. We have long admired his work and
suddenly we are told he's pretty intrigued about our
work. So, we are forming a working relationship. In
future newsletters and at this site, we'll be posting
articles written by the good doctor and promoting his
work.
Al
Sears, MD
12794 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite 16
Wellington, FL 33414 March 12, 2007 <