You’ll notice we’re using a new
font: Arial. The reason being, studies show that Arial
is the easiest font to read online. From now on all our
pages will be in Arial font and large enough for
everyone to read. We’ve published a new book:
Rapid Safe Weight Loss
Actually we've published two... see below. We’ve reviewed every diet book or
program to come down the pike. As your editor, I’ve
tried them all. They all worked, but many were just
painful, and the weight came on again over the next few
months because their basic tenets were just difficult to
follow (or remember). Having read a ton of stuff on
dieting and the theory of dieting, I wrote this book for
me. I lost 35 pounds in less than a month, and 5 months
later, it’s still off because I’ve followed a few
simple, basic rules. This is the time of year (the
harvest) where I can put on 5 to 10 pounds a month
indulging and washing it all back with a Sam Adams
Oktoberfest beer. I’m still enjoying the harvest and
still drinking my favorite beer, but I’m not gaining,
and once in a while I notice I’ve lost a pound. The book has some special recipes
just for its readers. And once you get the book, you’ll
find a section on this site JUST for you, where I will
post questions and answers, tips and tricks, an new
information I find on weight loss as I come across it. My proofreaders and those who have
purchased the book so far have all reported losing a
minimum of 5 pounds the first week. And the great thing
is, you get to have a cheat day (or two) in which you
can eat all your favorites and not drive yourself up a
wall depriving yourself a those nasty pleasures. One more thing: most diet books
that talk about exercise are aimed at a Now I’m not about to hype this book
with the lies you read all over the internet about
getting hundreds of dollars of freebies if you order
NOW. Cripes, I’ve followed a few links to sites with
clocks ticking down, telling me that if I don’t order
before it hits zero I’m going to lose out. The only hype I have for you is this: to everyone who finds the book on the web the cost is $19.95. For my faithful readers (we have half a million), it’s just ten bucks. Click on the book and take a look. Just think, by Christmas you could
fit into clothes you haven’t worn in ten years. I know I
am. Another Book? Yes, I’ve published another book.
This one is a collection of my photos. The cover (hard)
consists of stylized versions of two of my shots, and
the pages are the “accordion” type, allowing them to
fold out flat. It’s the perfect coffee table book. I am
publishing them one at a time right now, so the cost of
publication pretty high. Many have contacted me inquiring
about purchasing some
The book does contain a group of my
nudes, though no one has ever accused my work of being
less than tasteful. You may see the collection (takes a
while to load) by clicking here:
David’s PhotoArt.
Go to original:
http://silverbulletin.utopiasilver.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1410&Itemid=1 (SilverBulletin) In case anyone had
any doubts about who the FDA really serves, the latest
news should prove once and for all whose side they are
on - and it isn't yours or mine. The Washington Post has
reported that, in addition to approving genetically
modified "Frankenfish" salmon without requiring a GMO
label, the FDA will also be banning the inclusion of any
references to not containing genetically modified
content on food items which are GMO free. The FDA, which has been under
intense pressure from GM interests to approve the
modified salmon without requiring any labeling, stated
that it could not require a label on the salmon because
the agency determined that the altered fish are not
"materially different" from other salmon. Apparently,
the agency is using even the same, and even flimsier,
justifications to force food companies to hide the truth
if their products are GM/GMO free - much to the delight
of the multi-billion dollar GM industries. We should have seen such an
outrageous decision coming, given the FDA's past record
and continued turn away from protecting consumers'
health in favor of industry profits from drug and food
companies who are obviously its true clients and
masters. In 1994 the agency warned the dairy
industry that it could not use "Hormone Free" labeling
on milk from cows that are not given engineered
hormones. It claimed all milk contains some hormones. The FDA told one canola oil maker
that it could not use a label that included a red circle
with a line through it and the words "GMO," saying the
symbol suggested that there was something wrong with
genetically engineered food. It has also recently sent a flurry
of enforcement letters to food makers telling them they
could not use phrases such as "GMO-free" on their
labels, including a food maker which produces an all
fruit strawberry spread. In the case of the strawberry
spread, the FDA reasoned that the label would be
incorrect because GMO refers to genetically modified
organisms and strawberries are produce, not organisms. "This to me raises questions about
whose interest the FDA is protecting," House Rep. Dennis
Kucinich (D-OH) told the Washington Post. Kucinich has
repeatedly introduced bills in the House that would
require the labeling of genetically modified food but
has been unable to overcome the money and influence of
the GMO lobbies and companies. The FDA's actions come at a time
when consumers increasingly want to know the content of
their foods. In fact, polls consistently show that more
than 80% of Americans want genetically engineered foods
to be labeled. It also comes at a time when more and
more studies are demonstrating the health and
environmental dangers of GMO foods. "The public wants to know and the
public has a right to know," New York University
nutrition professor Marion Nestle told the Post. "I
think the agency has discretion, but it's under enormous
political pressure to approve [the salmon] without
labeling." Not surprisingly, the GM industry
agrees wholeheartedly with the FDA. As one director of
animal biotechnology said, "Extra labeling only confuses
the consumer. ... It differentiates products that are
not different [and] makes it harder for consumers to
make their choices." In other words, make it easier for
consumers to make choices by giving them no choices.
Forget about health dangers, our right to know, or the
constitutional rights to free speech (which the Supreme
Court has ruled includes commercial free speech in
anti-FDA decisions). The FDA simply wants to protect us
poor consumers from being confused.
Who do you think the FDA is really protecting? SIGN THE PETITION:
Click here: Institute for Responsible Technology
Further Reading:
FDA Ignores Skeletal Malformations, Other
Dangers of GMO Salmon
Tax Dollars Helping Pesticide Industry Lie
About Dangers
Swine Flu Scam Continues, Exposing Elderly
and Others to Needless Risks
Merck Sponsored Study Returns Dubious
Gardasil Autoimmune Safety Results
Union to FDA: Say NO to Genetically Modified Salmon
Excerpt:
Committee members had better brace themselves for a
blast from Michael Hansen, Senior Scientist at the
Consumers Union. "FDA requires new animal drugs to be
shown to be safe for animals, humans, and the
environment. This has not been shown for the GE salmon.
The data presented, although woefully incomplete, do
raise a potential serious human health issue—that of
increased allergenicity," he wrote in a prepared
statement (PDF),
going on to lambaste the approval process. "The FDA has
set the bar very low," he said, citing flaws such as
"sloppy science," "small sample sizes (only six fish),"
"questionable practices," and "woefully inadequate
analysis."
I read about something really
monumental today. It’s a big event but not necessarily
good for your health. The first-ever genetically
modified animal – salmon – is on its way to being
approved for human consumption. This genetically engineered fish
will contain DNA from two other fish species and
high levels of growth hormone. What happens when you eat
a genetically modified animal with very high levels of
growth hormone? No one knows. I have no idea what this
is going to do to people’s health, or how anyone could
know, because it’s never been done before. Between you
and me, I get the feeling that Frankenstein’s monster
has escaped from the laboratory and is running amuck in
nature. You can help avoid these
potentially harmful products with these tips:
1.
Find a farmer’s market in
your area. Eating locally is the best way to get the
freshest organic food with no trace of GMOs. Try these
websites:
www.farmersmarket.com or
www.localharvest.org.
2.
For dairy products and
other packaged foods, look for a “non-GMO” label. This
can be tricky, because the manufacturers of genetically
modified foods are lobbying hard to get “non-GMO” labels
banned. But for now, they’re still legal.
3.
Let your representatives
and senators know you’re concerned about this issue and
demand that genetically modified crops be banned until
proven safe. To Your Good Health,
Al Sears, MD
Editor’s Note:
Contact your representatives in Washington and tell them
to support the efforts of Representatives Peter DeFazio,
Dennis Kucinich, Mike Thompson, and George Miller, who
have requested that the FDA suspend its
precedent-setting review process until it thoroughly
examines and addresses the flaws in the approval
process, including the need for greater public input and
independent scientific data. Better still, send a fax. If you
want me to send your rep a fax,
email me your complete address and the name of your
representative. Dr Al
Sears supports our work with his
Wellness Research and his
top shelf supplements.
Panax Ginseng is an adaptogen,
meaning
it helps the body handle stress. In the old days, herbs
like Panax Ginseng were used in “tonics” that gave the
user a lift. However, adaptogens act like modulators,
bringing down systems that are overworked and lifting
systems that are lazy and slow.
Panax Ginseng is used in energy drinks, and has
been touted as a cure for male potency problems. In
China, it is also used on cancer patients, though it has
never been thought of as a cure for cancer. It helps
cancer patients who are suffering the “stress” of the
cure they endure.
However, it’s been discovered that one of the
chemical components of Panax Ginseng happens to be a
very powerful cancer fighter: AGS.
AGS (Algycon Sapogenin) is one of the
glycosides in Panax Ginseng. A glycoside is a molecule
that bonds sugar to another substance, a carbohydrate,
which is not a sugar. When they separate, the sugar goes
one way, and the carbohydrate part becomes active.
AGS’s activity, it turns out, is anti-neoplastic,
or in plain English, it kills cancer cells.
I must stop here to tell you how I found out
about this. Three readers sent me information on it.
They all had the same anecdotal stories of a few doctors
saving the lives of end-stage cancer patients, but each
one had several specifics the others did not have. When
I sat down to research on the web and document the
information they’d sent me, I could not find anything
these readers had sent me. What I did find was a ton of
research on AGS in vitro and in animal studies. It seems
that no study so far has been done using humans. The
anecdotal evidence supplied by a couple of doctors
curing cancer, in the world of pure science, do not
count as “real” studies since there was no control
group. However, when you put an end stage cancer patient
on a placebo, for the most part (nearly every time) that
person dies.
Here is what I’ve found so far:
1.
AGS enhances chemotherapy
at a rate that falls somewhere between (depending on the
cancer and the chemo) 1,000 times and 20,000 times.
2.
AGS induces apoptosis
(cell death) using a number of pathways.
3.
AGS kills cancers that are
drug resistant.
4.
AGS crosses the blood
brain barrier, making it affective for bran tumors.
5.
AGS kills only cancer
cells without hurting surrounding tissues.
6.
AGS is broadly effective,
killing cancer cells in breast cancer, prostate cancer,
glioblastoma, melanoma, stomach cancer, colon, kidney,
lung cancer, and one of the deadliest locations, the
pancreas.
7.
It has been reported that
some people have been cancer free in as little as 24
hours.
It is rumored that a biotech/pharmaceutical
company is rushing to create an artificial AGS. Next
comes the ten plus years of testing, costing over a
billion dollars. Imagine the price of this when it
finally arrives.
The anecdotal accounts so far reported are:
1.
One oncologist chose to
use AGS on terminal and untreatable cancer patients.
After five years, 86% were still alive.
2.
In 1999, a naturopath used
AGS on 15 cancer patients who had not responded to
chemotherapy. At last report, 13 were still alive.
3.
A Dr Paul
Ling Tai reports remarkable results with pancreatic
cancers.
After hours and hours of looking for a site that sells
AGS, I finally came across a company in Canada called
Pegasus Pharmaceuticals. They have two products (both
very expensive, but then again, how much is your life
worth?);
one for brain tumors, and
one for the rest of the body.
Read and follow the instructions at their site.
This is very important. You’ll not get the best results
if you don’t do exactly as they say.
A friend of
mine came to me telling me about her neighbor, a
diabetic who was suffering for two years from a MRSA
infection in his foot which had gone systemic. The
condition left him in a brain fog and he’d been unable
to drive for all this time. The doctors were considering
removing the foot, and in his mental state, he was
contemplating suicide. He did not want to go on living
with a foot missing.
She’d read
about one of Ron Salley’s Miracle Skin products called
HealonPF. She’d read one of our newsletter articles
about a physician who had healed his MRSA on his neck
(he’d had to stop practicing medicine because of it)
using the HealonPF.
She’d also
read a little bit about Covalent Silver Solution (which,
if you Google this you’ll find hundreds of sites selling
it, but buyer beware: except for two sites, they are all
frauds).
Since I’ve
met the inventor, he’s granted me exclusive rights to
his book, I’ve been buying the real thing from him, and
I had a bottle on hand for her. When I got my first
bottles, a reader wrote to me that her dog had systemic
MRSA and the doctor said the dog wouldn’t last two
weeks. I sent her a little bottle, and in less than
three days, the dog was better.
So my
friend ordered the HealonPF from Ron Salley, and I sent
her a liter of Covalent Silver Solution (its brand name
is BACO and the company can be found here:
www.bacouniversaldistributing.com).
Apparently,
in his confusion, her neighbor quadrupled the dose of
BACO. A standard dose is one tablespoon first thing in
the morning. Hold it under your tongue as long as you
can, then swallow. Some, those with bronchitis or lung
cancer, take it in using a nebulizer too. Claes Nobel,
the man in charge of the Nobel Prize, healed his
fourth-state esophageal cancer in three days using BACO
orally and by breathing it in. He came to America to
tell his story and shake the hand of the man who’d saved
his life.
Well, here
is the man’s testimonial, in his own words: I am a diabetic who has a MRSA sore
on my heel for 2 years. I have been seeing specialists
for the last 2 years who are trying to clear it up.
After 2 years it was still the size of a dime on the
surface and still quite deep. I began using Healon PF
and after only 10 days, it began to fill in and then
scabbed over. This never happened during the last 2
years with specialists, so it has got to be the Healon
PF that made the difference. I also used BACO at 2 tbs.
twice daily but learned that the dosage was higher
than needed. I now use 1tbs. BACO daily. Since
starting the BACO and Healon PF I have noticed a couple
more positive things. My blood sugar levels have become
more stable than they have been over the past 2 years. I
credit this to the BACO as it is killing off the
infection in my body and infection is known to mess with
blood sugar levels when one is diabetic. ALSO, and this
is VERY important, my confusion is less and I am now
able to drive again! Thank you for offering these great
products. David Weckert
Concerning BACO:
we’ll be publishing more on it in the future, but for
now, we have documentation from Belize, Central America
(we cannot post it online or every fraudulent site will
steal it and re-post it) that it has cured 150 cases of
AIDS (still HIV negative five years afterwards). We’ve
received 2 testimonials that it has healed Hep-C, three
testimonials that it’s healed herpes, and bunches of
testimonials that when used with
Del-Immune V® that it’s
stopped a cold or flu within a day if caught early. If
not caught early, we’ve been told that it usually helps
them get over the “crud” in two or three days. Now, because of federal
restrictions, we cannot sell anything at our site beyond
our books. BACO sells for $400.00 per liter, or $300.00
per 24oz bottle, and you have to buy a case ($1600.00
and $1800.00 respectively) if you order from the
company. HOWEVER, because of my close
connection to the inventor and because of the readers
who visit my site (many of them suffering from chronic
illness), the inventor sends me (not very often)
bottles for sale at a huge discount. I turn them over to
Simply the Best, and
they sell them on this hidden page (for my
readers only):
www.mnwp.org/silver/silver.htm. I am told that there
are only four liters left for sale plus a few small
bottles so you can have some on hand just in case you
get hit by this year’s creeping crud that’s already
going around. Please note that taking MORE BACO than recommended is less effective than taking less. This has been discovered in testing. We’ve posted a nearly viral piece
about Covalent
Silver Solution at our site that you may read by
clicking that link, but beware that some of the facts
surrounding its development and testing are a bit off.
The data on silver alone is extraneous to the subject,
because CSS has very little to do with silver and
everything to do with the billions of oxygen atoms
bonded through “cold fusion” to one single atom of
silver. Even one of the supposed studies mentioned in
that section never happened. This is the problem with
people passing on pieces that have not been fact
checked. Further on in this newsletter we
quote a columnist:
“The era
of antibiotics is coming to a close. In just a couple of
generations, what once appeared to be miracle medicines
have been beaten into ineffectiveness by the bacteria
they were designed to knock out.”
BACO is
way ahead of the pack. I’m going to let you in on two
points of interest that will be published in the
upcoming book:
1.
The Bush
administration ordered a BACO machine to be installed on
a ship headed for Iraq in preparation for a biological
attack on our soldiers. The machine was not finished in
time for the invasion.
2.
The Center
for Disease Control has written a paper on BACO that no
one you or I know has access to no matter how many
Freedom of Information forms you fill out. As the head
of the CDC has been reported to have said, “We have to
keep track of those things that can destroy a segment of
the economy.” This (number 2 above) is one reason
you won’t see any huge marketing push behind BACO. The
company is focusing on overseas sales, huge quantity
sales, because there are fewer restrictions.
China wants to mist BACO throughout its meat packing
plants to kill all pathogens. Personally I don’t go anywhere
without taking a bit of BACO along. I take it, my dogs
take it, and my chickens take it. This year I lost only
one chick to disease, but I’m pretty darn sure it had a
genetic problem. It looked sickly from day one. I am trying to get
Simply the Best to
carry cases that will be sold at the full price
($1600.00 for 4 liters), but since they can’t say
anything about it or what it does, it just seems too
futile.
Concerning
Ron Salley’s Creams:
I’ve said it before: Ron Salley’s creams are the best on
the planet. In a
previous
newsletter
we listed the ingredients to
Crème de La Mer
moisturizer. Crème de La Mer
sold, at that time, for something like $100.00 per
ounce. It has some pretty good ingredients, but also
chemicals that are toxic, along with a few known and
suspected carcinogens.
Ron’s
creams are made with the most expensive ingredients
produced according to Ron’s own standards.
His latest
cream: LAM (Like a Miracle) was made to help arthritis
and tendonitis, but was found to help heal psoriasis and
eczema.
We’ve just received a testimonial that it helped a man
with diabetic neuropathy:
Dear Ron:
I’ve been
using LAM on my toes that have extensive diabetic
neuropathy, for approximately 6 months with great
results.
As you
know, I’m a retired PhD organic chemist with almost 35
years of research experience in consumer products. When
I was at Eastman Chemical, I was a minor supplier of
Vitamin E acetate to you and I got a special pleasure
out of seeing someone craft a very high quality product
for everybody’s enjoyment.
I have had
Type 2 diabetes for some 30 years and this is absolutely
the one thing that takes away the pain of neuropathy.
Sincerely,
Dr. John J.
Hiller, Jr.
Ron sent me
some lip balm once. I and everyone who tried it loved
it. I’ve even heard from women using it on their crow’s
feet. I told Ron he had to sell this stuff, but he
balked, telling me that it was too expensive and time
consuming to make. So I told him to sell it for $15.00.
He wasn’t sure it could possibly sell at that price, but
it does and it lasts about three months.
His Sugar
Foot is the best foot cream on the planet and HealonPF
reverses diabetic sores. I never go anywhere without a
bottle in my car.
Finally,
recently Ron created the best moisturizer on the planet,
bar none. This is no exaggeration. And to this last
batch he created, he added BACO. Everyone who has tried
it has loved it. I’m sorry to say, it’s not yet for
sale, however, when it does go up for sale, you’ll see
ULTRA posted in his products at
Simply the Best.
For those
of you who want to try it, write to me and I’ll try to
get Ron to sell you some (though it is really right now
in its testing phase):
info@mnwelldir.org.
All of
Ron’s creams are at Simply the Best, and since we’ve got
Christmas coming up (and I doubt if I’ll have time to
get a newsletter out by that time) think of giving
someone on your list something from Ron’s line of
healing creams:
Simply the Best.
Quick Update: Just as I finished
writing this piece, the phone rang and it was Ron Salley.
After working away for the past three weeks, he’s
finally created a version of Sugar Foot made with BACO.
Stay tuned. We’ll tell you more after testing.
And as we
go to print, I just got a call from a friend who after
back surgery, found herself with a bad case of
neuropathy in one entire leg. Guess what? The LAM cream
worked on it. She just called to thank me.
We have
three movies for you that all contain the same basic
theme: Someone cures cancer and all the experts who
support a criminal system of profit based medicine gang
up on her/him, calling him/her a dangerous quack. Then
the FDA, FTC, AMA join in and through intimidation,
arrests, and out and out libel, make this person’s life
a living hell for the crime of healing cancer patients
who were given up on by these medical hypocrites.
Dying to Have
Known:
made by the renowned filmmaker, Steve Kroschel,
you can’t help giggling when, in the face of reality
based science, a group of asshats tell us that up is
down and right is left.
Burzynski
—The Movie:
The horrifying story about a good friend of ours,
Stanislaus Burzynski; the trials and tribulations he’s
suffered, all for curing incurable cancers.
Cancer
— The Forbidden Cures:
An amazing movie filled with archival footage that sums
up the barriers money based medicine has constructed to
reap profits while we all suffer.
After decades of dithering, the FDA
may be close to limiting the use of antibiotics in farm
animals destined for our food supply. (Currently, 17
million pounds of farm-administered antibiotics are used
annually.) The agency is particularly
concerned with antibiotics employed to speed animal
growth, which increase farmers' profits. No one is sure
just how antibiotics produce this effect, but many
scientists are certain of the imminent dangers they
pose, particularly... Antibiotic-Resistant "Superbugs" New strains of drug-resistant
salmonella and campylobacter are responsible
for recent outbreaks of severe intestinal sickness,
while antibiotic-resistant E. coli strains are
linked to millions of bladder infections every year.
Genetic tests confirm the direct connection to animal
products. Because farm animals are given
antibiotics on a regular basis from the time of birth,
the bacteria they're exposed to develop
drugs-resistance. These Superbugs are then transferred
to consumers by handling and eating these products. How Serious a Problem Is This?
Very. Hospitals are reporting that up to
30% of all urinary infections no longer respond to
standard antibiotic treatments -- and that newer
antibiotics are proving just as useless. Now, a frightening new Superbug has
just emerged which could render all (yes, all!) current
antibiotics totally ineffective. Called NDM-1(short for New Delhi
metallo-beta-lactamase), it's caused by an enzyme
that's easily transferred between different bacteria,
rendering them highly-resistant to any antibiotic. Currently found in resistant E.
Coli, (a common cause of urinary tract infections
and pneumonia), NDM-1 is confined to India for now. But,
with no effective drug to stop it, concerned scientists
are worried that NDM-1 could rapidly spread worldwide.
One strain of it is already in the
US. "We have our own homegrown version of NDM-1 that has
been recognized for quite a few years," says Dr.
Alexander J. Kallen of the Centers for Disease Control
(CDC) Outbreak Response Unit. How Did NDM-1 Happen?
Antibiotic Overuse. Antibiotics in India are cheap and
easily available over-the-counter, leading to misuse and
widespread drug resistance. NDM-1 thrives in germs that
proliferate in the gut -- and poor sanitation enhances
the spread of these drug-resistant Superbugs. And poor sanitation is one of the
hallmarks of US farm "factories" that produce meat,
milk, and eggs. So the FDA is between a rock and a
hard place regarding agricultural antibiotics: More
drugs on the farm speeds the development of these new
Superbugs. But cutting back, as they're proposing to do,
increases the chances that E. coli and other
bacteria will spread even quicker. What About Cleaning Up the
Feedlot? I won't ruin your day by posting
another video depicting the sickening conditions in the
typical industrial feedlot environment in which 95% of US
animal food products are raised. You already know how
gross this situation is. But this is exactly why growers
need all these drugs. Farm antibiotics are being used for
"disease prevention" because feedlot conditions are
ideal for spreading disease among animals. And given
their poor diet (feedlot animals are fed
carbohydrate-rich corn, which is akin to humans
subsisting on Pepsi and Snickers bars) their natural
immunity is extremely low. And their natural resistance is
further weakened by the destructive effect antibiotics
have on the beneficial bacteria which are the backbone
of their immune system. It's a lose-lose equation. Free-range animals, on the other
hand, don't need antibiotics (unless they become ill)
since they're fed well and roam outdoors during the day.
This is the best -- and cheapest -- "disease prevention"
there is. But Agribusiness Doesn't Want to
Reform Although the majority of Americans
say they don't want pesticides, hormones, antibiotics in
their food -- and even though many are willing to pay
higher prices for this safety -- corporate interests
refuse to change. They choose to perpetuate this
dangerous, disgusting, inhumane system because it is
highly profitable, regardless of its deleterious
effects. Like the Big Energy industry, which
continues to deny global warming even as the polar cap
melts and weather patterns change dramatically,
agribusiness lobbyists such as National Pork Producers
Council stubbornly maintain: "There is no conclusive
scientific evidence that antibiotics used in food
animals have a significant impact on the effectiveness
of antibiotics in people." That's Not What Doctors and
Scientists Say On the contrary, dear lobbyists,
indiscriminate antibiotic use in livestock is soundly
condemned by medical experts who cite circumstantial and
genetic evidence that this practice directly engenders
antibiotic-resistant bacteria. "For those of us in the public
health community, the evidence is unambiguously clear,"
says Dr. James R. Johnson, an infectious-disease expert
at the University of Minnesota. "Most of the E. coli
infections in humans can be traced to food-animal
sources." And in a letter to Congress in
July, CDC director Dr. Thomas R. Frieden specified
"compelling evidence" of a "clear link between
antibiotic use in animals and antibiotic resistance in
humans." Numerous scientific groups,
including the American Medical Association and the
Infectious Diseases Society of America, are up in arms.
Both are demanding even stronger action that the FDA is
proposing. Money Is the Real Issue Here But as is usually the case,
agribusiness cares more for profits than people. Giving up antibiotics would cost
growers $10 per animal in profits -- and maybe more if
rampant infections caused them to pay closer attention
to hygiene. If the FDA's proposed antibiotic
restrictions passed, agribusiness surely would have to
clean up its act. But this is completely doable, as was
demonstrated in the European Union when it banned
non-treatment uses of antibiotics in 2006. Denmark, for example, found that
the ban actually reduced human health risks without
significantly harming animal health or farmers' incomes.
In fact, livestock and poultry production have increased
since the ban, while antibiotic-resistance has declined. The bottom line cost to US
consumers would raise the cost of pork, for instance, by
only five cents a pound. That's a pittance when you
consider the benefits. It's Time Agribusiness Paid Its
Fair Share It really steams me that
billion-dollar corporations are allowed to endanger
public health like this. And that taxpayers usually get
stuck with cleaning up their messes. It's time to stand up and draw a
line in the sand. Unless we reform industrial
agriculture soon, we're going to be faced with a perfect
storm of crises -- not the least of which is
antibiotic-resistant Superbugs. Do you realize that 70% of all
antibiotics sold in the U.S. are given to healthy farm
animals, not people? And that taxpayer-funded farm
subsidies help foot the bill?
Two Ways You Can Help End This: First, refuse to buy any animal
products that aren't truly pasture-raised. Cheap meat is
no bargain if it's going to upset your hormonal balance,
give you cancer, or threaten the world with a pandemic
of non-treatable disease. Don't trust labels. Only purchase
brands of animal products that you know and trust. Even
better, locate a local farmer and buy directly from
him/her. Second, add your voice to the
growing demand for safer, cleaner, more sustainable
agriculture. The FDA was recently deluged with
200,000 letters responding to its request for comments
on new rules governing the use of antibiotics on
industrial farms. They were overwhelmed. Leading the charge is the
non-profit Pew Charitable Trusts, which is campaigning
against indiscriminate antibiotic use in farm animals.
Go to
www.saveantibiotics.org and address their "Take
Action" letter to your Congressperson. (The entire
action takes less than 30 seconds.) I know that a lot of you follow the
MyHealingKitchen.com website for our recipes
and healing information. I routinely receive messages
from members telling me they "aren't political." My response is: "It's Impossible to Be Healthy
in an Unhealthy World" What's happening to our food supply
directly affects you and me. The threat of
antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a perfect example. Like it or not, food is
political. How you spend your money has a greater impact
on societal change than voting. And it's far more
immediate. It's never been more important that
you spend wisely than now.
Editor’s Note:
These articles are written by Jim Healthy of My Healthy
Kitchen. He’s a great writer/researcher with a great
site. You can pick up his two main products here:
Arthritis Interrupted and
30 Day Diabetes Cure
How many times must we tell you
about a published a study that tries its darndest to
prove left is right, down is up, and truth is a lie?
Conventional medicine will never
stop creating studies in such a way as to tell us that
everything we know is wrong. They have just one goal: to
make us all patients who need their drugs. They go out
of their way to “prove” that herbs, vitamins,
supplements, and nutrition are worthless, harkening back
to the late seventies when the official stance of the
AMA was that nutrition has nothing to do with health. Right. This time it’s fish oils.
Apparently they designed a study so that the outcome
would be proof positive that fish oils do nothing for
heart health. Someone forgot to tell them that the pharm
industry just came up with a prescription form of fish
oils. Did they not get the memo? To top it off, the study was
published in the
New England Journal of Medicine this past August.
You’d think that such a prestigious publication would be
more careful. The best way to debunk a study is
to delve into the methodology. Normally this is near
impossible if you don’t have a medical degree because
most sites with this information are closed to everyone
but professionals, and if you do find what you’re
looking for, you’ll need a medical transcriber to
translate the study into English before you can
understand it. However, this time the
New England
Journal of Medicine was kind enough to publish just
enough to make clear the intent of the study. At the start of the study, the
participants were asked to consume one of four different
types of margarines: one supplemented with omega-3 fatty
acids; one supplemented with the plant-derived ALA; one
supplemented with both omega-3 fatty acids and ALA; and
one with no supplements. At the end of the study, it was found
that 14 percent of the heart attack patients had
experienced another major cardiovascular event, with
some cases ending in death. Neither low doses of
docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid
(EPA), which are found in fish oil, nor of alpha-linolenic
acid (ALA), derived from nuts and several vegetable
oils, provided any benefit to the vast majority of heart
patients. What they don’t tell you is that
they had to eat four heaping tablespoons of this poison
(yes, margarine is poison) each day. To create the pharmaceutical grade
fish oils, participants in the studies under the aegis
of the pharmaceutical industry had to take 1000 mg
daily. Overall, the truly hilarious part
of this entire fiasco was that they recommended
margarine to heart patients. Margarine causes
heart disease. Partially hydrogenated oils (trans fats)
are a major contributor to cancer, heart disease, and
type 2 diabetes. Isn’t it about time to force our
medical students to study nutrition and orthomolecular
medicine? Isn’t it time to stop this insanity?
This is something we wrote about
years ago, but recently, because of stats published by
the National Cancer Institute, a number of web sites
have taken up the cause. At least half a dozen readers
sent me info on this (thank you!) and I’m going to take
it one step further. First, here are the stats:
1.
CT scans from 2007 alone
could possibly contribute to 29,000 new cancer cases
with 15,000 cancer deaths.
2.
Over the past ten years,
150,000 Americans will die from CT scan-induced cancers.
3.
The incidence of breast
cancer directly correlates with the increased rise of
medical X-rays.
4.
X-rays and CT scans
(super X-rays with hundreds and hundreds times more
radiation) causes plaque on arteries, producing untold
numbers of cardiac incidents (no one has yet to compile
data to get actual figures). Ironically, the same physician who
proposed that high cholesterol was a disease (it isn’t)
and that cholesterol “causes” heart disease (it doesn’t)
and proposed low-fat, low-cholesterol diets to prevent
heart disease (it won’t) is the same doctor who
discovered that radiation from X-rays and CT scans
leaves atherosclerotic plaque on our arteries. His name
is Dr. John
Gofman, MD, PhD.
To learn the
truth about cholesterol, plaque buildup, and the causes
of atherosclerosis, you’ll have to read the articles in
our Cardiovascular Wellness section.
The irony of
the above is simply that Gofman proposed once that
cholesterol caused cardiovascular disease, and now he
finds that radiation causes it. This time he’s right,
even though in both cases, cholesterol lands on the
arteries (which are already sick) and because of a diet
low in antioxidants, the cholesterol calcifies causing
plaque.
All in all, we
should realize that radiation is not good for our
health.
We have to ask
ourselves why the use of CT scans has increased
geometrically. Some say it is to avoid misdiagnosis.
Here we have another irony, since doctors misdiagnosing
patients’ problems has also increased geometrically.
The next
article I’m going to point you to adds an angle to this
story that should wrap it all up for us. It’s called
The Fading Art of The Physical Exams.
You’ll find in the article a great quotation by a
Dr. Abraham Verghese:
"I sometimes joke that if you come to our hospital
missing a finger, no one will believe you until we get a
CAT scan, an MRI and an orthopedic consult. We just
don't trust our senses."
Blood Pressure Drugs Cause Cancer
Lancet Oncology this year reported
a study conducted at the Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine that showed that angiotensin-receptor
blockers (ARBs) increase your risk of cancer by 11%
overall, with a 25% increase in your chances of lung
cancer. ARBs are also taken for heart failure and kidney
disease (in diabetics). Sales of the drugs (Diovan,
Cozzar, Hyzarr, Avapro, and Atacand) top 25 billion
dollars annually. Avastin Linked to Kidney Disease
Persons taking Avastin, the most
widely used chemotherapy (cancer drug), according to a
study conducted at Stony Brook University Cancer Center,
were nearly five times more likely to develop serious
kidney damage, and nearly eight times more likely to
develp nephritic syndrome (causing cholesterol levels to
rise and blood protein levels to drop). The findings
were based on 16 studies involving 12,268 cancer
patients and published in the Journal of the American
Society of Nephrology, 2010. Vitamin D Protects Against
Parkinson’s Disease and Mental Decline
We’ve published past studies
showing that Vitamin D protects against cancer, heart
disease, and type 2 diabetes, but new studies just
reported in the Archives of Internatl medicine, 2010 go
still further. Researchers have now discovered in a
significant group of people aged 65 and older, that
those with a severe deficiency of Vitamin D were 60%
more likely to suffer significant cognitive decline as
compared to people with adequate levels of the vitamin.
In a separate major study of over 3000 men and women
aged 50 to 79, they found that those with high Vitamin D
levels protected the subjects against Parkinson’s. The
study had a 29 year follow up period in which they
calculated that those with high levels of Vitamin D were
67% less likely to develop Parkinson’s than those with
low levels. Gum Disease Linked to Alzheimer's
Researchers at New York University
discovered a connection between gum disease and
Alzheimer’s when they found that patients with
Alzheimer’s had significantly higher levels of
inflammatory molecules from diseased teeth and gums
compared to healthy people. The study was published in
the International Association for Dental Research, July
2010. Calcium Supplements Linked to
Heart Attack Risk in Elderly
Published in the British Medical
Journal, a new study shows that calcium supplements,
often prescribed by doctors in older patients to prevent
osteoporosis, increases the chance of heart attack in
the elderly by 30% for both men and women. Calcium
supplementation in the elderly has never been proven to
prevent osteoporosis and now it seems it could be very
detrimental. The study did not publish whether the
Calcium supplements contained magnesium, which,
according to most nutritionists is a must combination,
for they’ve known for years that Calcium administered
without magnesium can be detrimental to everyone. Most
nutritionists tell us to get our calcium from dark green
vegetables and supplement with 5,000 IU of Vitamin D
daily. Dietary Supplement Proves to be
Toxic
1,4 Butanediol is an industrial
solvent that converts to gamma hydroxbutyrate (GBH) when
ingested. Though regulated in industrial use, it
suddenly began to show up in dietary supplements
marketed as a sexual aid, athletic performance aid, and
for those with depression or insomnia. It’s even sold to
cure baldness, wrinkles, and poor vision. The New England Journal of
Medicine, 2001, reported that individuals taking the
drug have reported vomiting, urinary incontinence, fecal
incontinence, respiratory depression, combativeness,
agitation, blackouts, addiction, and withdrawal
symptoms. Thus far two deaths have been attributed to
its use. Sniff Test Developed as a
Predictor of Parkinson’s
Currently there is no “cure” for
Parkinson’s but it is hoped if it is caught early
enough, current therapies might be more effective and
slow the disease’s progress. It seems that in the very
early stages of Parkinson’s, before it is usually
diagnosed, people who will develop Parkinson’s start to
lose their sense of smell. So, according to Proceedings
of the European Society of Human Genetics, June 13,
2010, a “sniff test” has been developed by researchers
that will tell your physician if you’re losing your
sense of smell and raise a red flag for Parkinson’s. Medical Schools Teaching Incorrect
Procedures
Filed under “I’m not surprised,”
it’s been found that doctors have been taught to treat
wounds in the worst possible way for decades and
decades. When a person is injured (sports
trauma, infections, etc), the procedure taught is to
bring down the inflammation, using ice, or NSAIDS, and
once the inflammation is halted, the healing will being. Wrong. The Cleveland Clinic has just
reported that inflammation is a very important part of
the healing process, as inflammatory cells near the
injured muscle produce a high level of growth factor
that speeds up the rate at which muscles regenerate. Forget the Gym: Hit the Park
In another study of the obvious
published by Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,
researchers found that those who exercise outdoors have
a better overall sense of wellbeing than those who
exercised indoors. Duh. They also noted that those
exercising, walking, running, gardening, or cycling near
water felt an even greater sense of wellbeing than
without the water. Ask your doctor if getting up off
your ass is right for you! Xrays Double the Risk of Leukemia
in Children
Again we must state our position:
radiation is not good at any level, for it was
discovered during the Northern California Childhood
Leukemia Study, that just three x-rays are enough to
double a child’s risk of leukemia. The researchers
reported that the findings surprised the heck out of
them because they never expected to find a link. Swimming Pool Disinfectant linked
to Cancer and Asthma
Environmental Science & Technology,
2010, published a warning for those hitting the swimming
pools this summer: SHOWER BEFORE YOU SWIM. It seems that
the mixture of sunscreen creams, cosmetics, and pool
disinfectants produces a toxic soup that can mutate
genes, accelerate ageing, cause respiratory problems,
birth defects, and even cancers. To prevent sunburn,
wrap in a towel and wear a hat when out of the pool. But
definitely shower before you swim. Blood Transfusions Are Killing
Patients
After going over data from 221
hospitals in the UK (nearly 4500 patient records,
patients who had been admitted for upper
gastro-intestinal bleeding) it was discovered that those
patients who received a blood transfusion within 12
hours of their hospitalization were 25% more likely to
die compared to those who did not receive a transfusion.
UK doctors are
now rethinking their policies and say that blood
transfusions should be reserved for those whose blood
loss is considerable enough to be life threatening. Cruciferous Vegetables Stop Cancer
From Spreading
Though this is something we’ve been
talking about for years, it seems that some scientists
at the Ohio State University “discovered” that
“indole-3-carbinol,” a phytochemical found in this class
of vegetable blocked breast cancer cells. However, they
also felt that I3C would also fight other cancers such
as prostate, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and might even
reverse Alzheimer’s disease. It seems that women with
advanced, life threatening breast cancer have an
abnormal abundance of a specific “molecule” in their
blood, and the I3C destroys the cancer and this
molecule. Coincidentally, at Heidelberg
University Hospital, this past summer they released a
study that showed that broccoli and other cruciferous
vegetables were better cancer fighters than a new
chemotherapy they’d been testing. The drug they were
testing (Sorafenib) was designed to fight pancreatic
cancers, but in a study using mice, it was effective
only for about four weeks. It was discovered that when
the mice were fed their veggies, the drug continued to
be effective. They also discovered that the veggies were
able to break the “cancer-causing sequence in stem
cells” all on their own without the drug. Homeopathy Basis Backed by Nobel
Prize Winning Scientist’s Discovery
While Quackpots like Steven Barret
publish web pages slandering homeopathy, a “real”
doctor, the Frenchi virologist who got the Nobel Prize
for connecting HIV to AIDS, Profesor Luc Montagnier has
made a shocking discovery. Shocking to his
contemporaries, at least. The basis of Homeopathy is that the
potency of a substance increases with dilution. Dr
Montagnier discovered that solutions containing the DNA
of pathogens emit low frequency radio waves (something
that Royal Rife discovered in the 1920s). However, the
real discovery was that the radio waves remained in the
water, even after dilution.
Weight-Loss Drug Meridia Pulled From U.S. Market
FRIDAY,
Oct. 8, 2010. Abbot Laboratories agreed to pull its
“obesity” drug, Meridia from the market after the FDA
published that showed a 16% increased risk for, heart
attack, stroke, and death in its users compared to those
taking a placebo.
Additionally, it was found that the drug produced
minimal results in weight loss for those taking it.
There is
no “magic bullet” for weight loss, and if there was, the
moment people go off of it, the weight begins to pile on
again. There are supplements that can help boost
metabolism and fat burning, and let’s face it, as we age
our metabolism starts to drop off and our hormones go
missing in action, so we have to work even harder at
maintaining a healthy weight.
Again, we
have a solution for you who’ve never exercised or have
been on that weight loss, weight gain roller coaster:
Rapid Safe Weight Loss.
Or, you can go in search of a pill: Ask your doctor if
heart attack, stroke, or death is right for you! Walking Linked to Longevity
The father of medicine,
Hippocrates, felt that walking was the best exercise of
them all. The International Journal of Epidemiology,
2010, agrees. Researchers from the London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found that people who
walked for just 30 minutes a day, five days a week
reduced their risk of premature death by 19%, while
those who added a bit of light exercise reduced their
risk by 24%. Again, ask your doctor if getting up off
your ass is right for you! Reports from Europe that
Alternative Therapies Will Be Wiped Out By Big Pharma by
the Year 2012
Because of pressure by obscene
wealth on the European Union, four laws about to be
implemented will reduce the people in Europe’s options
to drugs and more drugs. Here are what the four laws will
do:
Expect America to follow as Big
Money pretending to be the common people fighting for
Freedom and Liberty will now be buying politicians that
support this type of legislation. Good bye freedom and
liberty. Mobile Phones Cause Tinnitus
We’ve published warnings of brain
tumors being caused by cell phones, but now they’ve
found that every ten minutes on a cell phone increases
your risk of tinnitus by a whopping 71%. Most tinnitus
sufferers said their problem was on the left side, where
they held their phone, while 29% also suffered from
vertigo. We are never going to get rid of
our cell phones, but getting a speaker phone will sure
help protect you. Additionally, a “blue
tube” sold by Dr Mercola is another protection.
Using a blue tooth or a wired earpiece has the same
results as holding the phone to your ear.
Laptop and WiFi Warning: Making
Men Infertile
Recently we’ve heard on the news of
this new disorder called Toasted Skin Syndrome caused by
using a laptop right on your lap, but did you know that
it can also lead to infertility in men? You can read the full article here:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/295085, but
the brunt of it is this: USE A DESKTOP, not your lap. Researchers from Nascentis, a
reproductive medical center in Cordoba, Argentina found
that WiFi radiation affects sperm motility and damages
the DNA. They discovered that virtually every laptop
user had damaged sperm when samples were compared with
those from men who didn’t use a laptop and WiFi.
Industry shills dispute this saying that WiFi radiation
is very, very low and couldn’t possibly cause such
damage. Who are you going to believe? Rice—Which Is Best
Need I mention one more time at
this site that processed foods are deadly? Another study
of the obvious reported in the Archives of Internal
Medicine concluded that brown rice is better than white
rice. Duh. Processed foods spike your blood
sugar levels and eventually lead to insulin
insensitivity. Brown rice contains FIBER, not to mention
minerals, vitamins, and a host of phytochemicals. Eating
fiber reduces the spikes in your blood sugar. What the study didn’t mention is
Black Rice, which has all of the good
stuff found in brown rice, and gives you an antioxidant
kick like no other rice. Black Rice can be found only
online or in Asian markets. Look for a black rice bran
supplement in the near future. To lower your risk of diabetes, eat
rice that is unprocessed. You folks who love sushi
should eat a high fiber salad with your meals.
Microwave Tomography Safer Than
Mammograms
We’ve warned everyone for a long
time about the dangers (myths) of mammography, and now
researchers are on our side. Published in the SIAM
Journal on Applied Mathematics, 2010, (Journal of
Applied Mathematics???) is a conclusive study showing
that compared to Mammograms that expose women’s breasts
to radiation while abusing them with pressure, not to
mention that they are notoriously unreliable (invasive
and unreliable; that’s some great selling points)
microwave tomography is cheaper, more accurate, and just
plain less risky. But as long as radiologists run the
National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer
Society is funded heavily by companies supplying
mammograms, don’t expect to find too much information on
this procedure. Fetal X-rays
Connected to Schizophrenia In Young
Speaking of radiation… Researchers at the Yale School of
Medicine found that monkeys that had been x-rayed in the
womb started to show brain development problems by the
time they were five years of age. The monkeys had
learning and memory problems, both signs of
schizophrenia. They found that the earlier in the
development of the fetus that they are x-rayed, the
greater the damage.
Psychiatric Drugs Cause Blood Clots
A recent (soon to be published in
the BMJ) cohort study that examined the records of over
25,000 people in ages from 16 to 100 who had developed
deeb vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism found
something very interesting. They compared those records
to 89,000 other people who did not have those
cardiovascular problems and found that antipsychotic
drugs (like Serouel, Abilify, Solian, Lonasesn, and
Risperdal) were at the root of their cardiovascular
conditions. Interestingly enough, those just starting
the drugs double their chances of blood clots in just
the first three months, and those taking low potency
versions of the drugs were at an even higher risk. Psychiatric Drugs Cause MadnessRobert Whitaker’s latest book
Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric
Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in
America Vitamin E Protects Against Dementia
Published in the Archives of
Neurology, 2010, this study focused on the antioxidants
vitamin C, Beta Carotene, bioflavonoids, and vitamin E.
As it turns out, those who consumed the most vitamin E
were 25% less likely to develop dementia. Though not
sure why the connection, they did note that vitamin E’s
anti-inflammatory properties were probably responsible
for the protection, as inflammation seems to be one of
the main causes of Alzheimer’s.
·
Additional research shows
that vitamin E
·
Prevents
Respiratory Infections
·
Lowers Your
Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
·
Lowers Your
Prostate Cancer Risks
·
Inhibits Breast
Cancer Cells
·
Builds Stronger
Bones
·
Lowers Your
Risk of Heart Disease
·
Reduces Your
Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
·
Protects Your
Brain After a Stroke
·
Wards Off Colds
and Prevents Upper Respiratory Infection
Most of these shorts were found
at www.wddty.com.
If you want to get them quicker and more often, go get
yourself a free membership.
Glucosamine-chondroitin is the
top-selling nutritional supplement on the market today.
The reason is simple: It halts the pain and discomfort
of arthritis that makes life miserable for more than 40
million arthritis suffering Americans. And medical
studies prove it works. In 2006, the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) conducted the largest study ever on
glucosamine-chondroitin and found that the majority of
arthritis sufferers who took the supplement experienced
significant pain reduction. In the NIH study, the
glucosamine-chondroitin supplement stopped joint pain
and inflammation better than the leading COX-2 arthritis
drugs or leading NSAID medications, without any of the
mild to severe side effects of those drugs. Study
participants reported dramatic improvement from the
supplement within four weeks–and the longer they took
it, the better they felt. 1. Homemade glucosamine for
free. What if you could make the most effective
arthritis pain-relieving supplement, instead of forking
out $40 to $75 for a jar? You absolutely can! All it
takes are a few bones from the butcher, some crustacean
shells and your favorite soup kettle. That’s all you
need to create a high-potency Arthritis Soup Stock full
of glucosamine and chondroitin, which have been proven
to soothe your chronic arthritis joint pain. This soup stock was a kitchen
mainstay throughout history. Every stove usually had a
simmering stockpot into which homemakers tossed bones,
shells and vegetable scraps. Later it was used as the
base for soups, sauces and gravies. The stockpot has
disappeared in the modern era in favor of convenience
foods. But now you can still make your own super-soup at
home for practically free. Some nutritional experts
believe bone broth’s absence from our regular diet
partially explains the current spike in arthritis rates.
While it certainly isn’t the sole cause, the low levels
of joint-protective nutrients in our modern diet, such
as collagen, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate,
glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), glycine, proline (which helps
create collagen), and sulfur compounds–all of which are
necessary for the creation and repair of damaged joint
cartilage–is an important factor. The Arthritis Soup
Stock returns them to your diet. 2. The secret ingredients in
glucosamine supplements. Here’s the shocker: this
high-priced, in-demand glucosamine-chondroitin
supplement is made from the same raw materials as bone
broth, which are virtually free for the taking.
Glucosamine, an essential building-block of the
cartilage in our own joints, also comes to us from the
shells of crustaceans such as crab, lobster and shrimp.
Animal cartilage in soup bones is a rich source of
chondroitin sulfate. Together, these two compounds help
our bodies repair arthritis-damaged joints and keep
existing joints well-lubricated by helping cartilage
absorb more water. 3. Make arthritis healing soup
stock 1. Fill a large soup pot with beef
or pork knuckles, feet, back bones and/or joint bones.
Add chicken bones and carcasses. These gelatin-rich
animal parts contain the highest concentration of
chondroitin. 2. Toss in as many crustacean
shells as will fit. They are loaded with glucosamine. 3. Dump in eggshells. Vegetable
scraps are great, too. 4. Splash in some lemon juice or
vinegar to release the calcium and
glucosamine-chondroitin from the bones and cartilage. 5. Cover with cold water and bring
to a boil. Reduce heat to a simmer, cover and let it
cook on the lowest possible heat for hours, checking the
water level and heat every once in a while. 6. If scum floats to the surface,
skim it off with a spoon. 7. When the broth is done, strain
the liquid through a colander. Chill and then remove the
fat. The liquid will keep in your fridge
for up to four days–or freeze it to use later. Use this arthritis super-soup as
stock for a variety of soups by adding veggies, beans
and herbs. Cook whole grains in this broth, too. Or you
can simply sip a hot cupful to soothe and repair your
joints. An even easier method: Place all
ingredients into slow cooker and let it simmer for a
couple of days on low heat. You can also oven-roast raw
bones with their meat to bring out their flavor, but
it’s not essential. Or you can make a seafood-only
broth. Slow cook until you arrive at a gelatinous brew. For more great recipes to fight
inflammation and arthritis, check out:
Arthritis Interrupted.
Sometimes
a story comes along that is just too hard to swallow. At
first it looks like complete hogwash; something the
Quackpots at Quackbusters would have a field day with.
As a journalist, I was taught to always be skeptical,
but at least be open enough to get the story and check
it out.
Well, I
have checked this out and now it’s your turn to gawk
incredulously.
Dr. Leonard
Horowitz
is a Harvard graduate and public health expert. The
first time I ever heard of him was when he tore into Dr
Oz over H1N1 vaccine. He’s been labeled (libeled) a
quack, yet no one has yet refuted the points he makes.
Howorwitz
believes that all healing occurs from “vibrations.” Now
this might sound at first a bit hokey, but if you think
about it, everything, even medicines, contains energy.
Energy creates frequencies. In homeopathy, it is the
“memory” of a substance, diluted to the extreme in
water, that creates the vibrations that heal. And I know
you’ve all read our articles on Qigong that describe the
healing energies we all hold. Energy is vibration;
vibration is energy. Finally there is Royal Rife who
cured cancer with frequencies. If you’ve not read about
him, then perhaps this is the best time to do so:
Royal Rife.
In walks Dr.
Joseph Puleo, an herbalist, naturopath, and Christian
minister. Puelo has an enormously wide span of
interests. While going over passages in the Bible, he
uncovered something amazing. Puleo states that while
intuitively guided, he discovered a code repeated in the
Book of Numbers. He reduced the code using the
Pythagorean method to six numbers consisting of six
digits.
You’re going
to need a little background.
In music, we
have a 12-Tone Equal Temperament Scale where an octave
is divided into 12 equal parts (A,
Dr. Joseph
Puleo’s discovery, those numbers, turn out to be the
lost Solfeggio Scale.
One of these
notes, 528 Hz, influences the water molecules
surrounding DNA, and affect the DNA in an ultra-positive
manner. It is thought, by those studying these
frequencies, that
damaged DNA is
repaired by this frequency.
This lost
scale was used in the Gregorian Chants and in a song to
John the Baptist. Their resurrection is seen by some as
a huge leap forward in understanding the power of energy
and frequencies to heal.
In walks Dr
Candace Pert, PhD. Pert has a PhD in Pharmacology. She
is also a neuroscientist. Her life has been a long,
steady march toward understanding healing. She feels
that this particular frequency goes all the way to the
molecular level where we find 70 different receptors
that begin to vibrate, opening the chromosomes and
exposing the DNA to these frequencies.
In New York,
at the Quantum Biology Research Lab, these frequencies
were recently tested. DNA in test tubes were exposed to
music composed using the Solfeggio scale. They
discovered that the frequencies unwound the DNA helix
allowing the DNA to absorb UV Light. We’ve written quite
a bit on UV Light already, so you might want to check
that out too:
UV Light.
In the
interest of Full Disclosure, I should tell you that the
people mentioned in this little article are considered
quacks. Then again, I am considered a quack. As long as
mainstream medicine is profit based, we’ll see a lot
more studies on alternatives designed purposely to fail,
and a constant debunking of anything that interferes
with their profits. Healing sounds will never get a fair
testing from the mainstream.
As a
journalist, I can only give you the facts. I cannot tell
you whether this works or not, as it has not had enough
studies, independent studies.
With that in
mind, I felt that perhaps my readers would like to try
these sounds and see for themselves. If anyone gets
positive (or negative) reactions to this music, please
write to me:
info@mnwelldir.org.
I’ve attained a copy of a one hour meditation CD that is
yours for free.
To download
your copy of what some have referred to as the
“frequency of love,” right click the following link and
choose to Save Target:
528 Hz
Meditation.
Burn it onto a CD and fall asleep to it.
Further
Reading:
http://www.relfe.com/bible_codes.html
Since discovering Organic Zero,
I’ve continued my investigation and found a few more
things I should pass onto you. First, I’ve found a cheaper
version. Organic Zero is Erythritol, which is in a
class of sugars that are alcohols. Xylitol and
sorbitol are also “alcohol sugar.”
There are two theories (http://www.xylitolpreventscavities.com/science/how-xylitol-works.html)
on how this depletes the numbers of bacteria on our
teeth:
1.
The bacteria are
starved and weakened and die off.
2.
Bacteria that cannot
live off of these “alcohol sugars” are supplanted by
bacteria that can, but are not harmful to teeth and
their colonization of the terrain pushes out the
harmful bacteria. Perhaps it’s a combination of
both. So, there you have it. Bacteria
that normally eat sugars and excrete acidic
byproducts that cause dental cavities, just can’t
live that cycle in the presence of one of these
sugars. The result is less dental plaque which
promotes a condition in your mouth where
“remineralization” can take place. Additionally, studies have
shown that these alcohol sugars protect against
further gum disease even in patients who have
advanced gum disease. The alcohols most likely
cannot get into the deeper pockets in people’s gums,
but good bacteria, being quite motile, can. There you have it: Healthy
teeth and gums.
The reason I’ve talked about
xylitol and sorbitol is that Erythritol does the
exact same thing. I’ve found examples of people
putting these sugars in nasal sprays for sinusitis.
It weakens the bacteria and research shows that
after one spray, at least 50% of the pathogens in
your nasal cavities just drop off. Side Effects
There are side effects to
consuming these “alcohol sugars,” and I’d be remiss
if I did not warn you. We don’t digest them very well.
This being the case, some experience digestive
disturbances, gas, and diarrhea. I’ve found that a
high fiber diet helps this situation. But if you’re
going to eat a lot of Erythritol heavily, you’ll be
spending a bit more time in the bathroom. The Price
Many have told me that the cost
of Organic Zero is just too high. I don’t blame them
at all. So I went searching and found a lot of
interesting things. Cargil has their version called
Zerose. They plan to do something with it soon and expect to
find products with Zerose in them. Products with
Erythritol are already on the market.
And I’ve found for you some Erythritol from Now
Foods:
GET IT HERE!
It’s much cheaper than Organic Zero at 8 bucks a
pound. Minor Problems
Because it’s 70% the sweetness of sugar, it’s kind
of hard to substitute. Mathematically you would use
1.43 times what the recipe calls for in sugar.
However, I like my food a little less sweet than
most recipes, so I use 1.25 times the recipe.
Additionally, I’ve had problems getting Erythritol
to melt in recipes. I solved the problem by
measuring out the amount I need and tossing that
into a blender to turn it to powdered sugar. Works
like a charm!
With Type 2 Diabetes in epidemic
proportions, doctors are prescribing Avandia to lower
blood sugar levels. Lord knows we need to keep our
blood sugar levels under control, and Lord knows the
pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe we need a
drug for this. Avandia is just dangerous. It can lower your blood sugar
levels dangerously low to hypoglycemic levels. It can cause liver inflammation and
mess with your liver enzymes. Sure, lets lower our blood sugar
levels, but drugs are just not the way to do it. In February of 2008, the New York
Times published:
Diabetes Study Partially Halted After Deaths. It
seems that the experimental group, the group that
controlled their blood sugar levels using drug therapy
experienced 54 more deaths than the control group. One doctor reported: “It’s
confusing and disturbing that this happened. For 50
years, we’ve talked about getting blood sugar very low.
Everything in the literature would suggest this is the
right thing to do.” Of course the “literature” suggests
this, because the literature also suggests they use
drugs. Two years later, The Times
published:
Research Ties Diabetes Drug to Heart Woes, as if we
didn’t see this one coming. Hundreds of heart attacks
and deaths were attributed to Avandia, the so-called
“controversial” diabetes drug. So now the Justice Department gets
involved. Congressional hearings to follow. CNN posts
online:
Senate Report Links Diabetes Drug Avandia to Heart
Attacks Of course they should, along with a few bureaucrats from the FDA. They’ve known about cardiovascular
problems with Avandia since 2003 and doctors are STILL
prescribing it. In fact, after the initial testing,
before it was even approved in 1999, one of the doctors
from the studies said that patients taking Avandia had
nearly twice as many "ischemic myocardial events" as
those in the study using other diabetes protocols. And
the study was conducted over a period of just six
months. Sadly, the number of actual deaths
as compared to the number of reported deaths is much
higher. Hospitals and studies always under report the
negative side. Studies use strange logic. For example,
if you die during a cancer study, your death doesn’t
count in the final tally because you didn’t complete the
study. If you have a heart condition before a study and
die of a heart condition during a study in which people
are dropping dead of heart conditions, yours doesn’t
count. Our latest health care bill might have wiped out
pre-existing conditions, but in a study, they note that
pre-existing condition and your death doesn’t count.
To make matters worse, in August of this year (2010), wddty.com publishes
the following story:
New warning on Avandia as researchers discover it weakens bones
05 August 2010
There’s more bad news for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and its antidiabetes drug
Avandia. The drug already comes with a strong warning
that it cause a heart attack, and now researchers have
also found it increases the risk of fracture in
postmenopausal women. Avandia (rosiglitazone) and Actos
(pioglitazone) may also have the same effect on men who
take either drug, too, say researchers from the
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. They made their
discovery when they analysed 786 cases of fractures and
matched them against 2,657 diabetes patients who hadn’t
suffered a fracture. The drugs seemed to be the one
difference between the two groups, and the rate of
fractures increased with the dosage. (Source: Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, July 14, 2010: doi:
10.1210/jc.2009-2638). The most irritating thing here, the
elephant in the room, is the simple fact that keeping
our blood sugar from spiking is very easy. We are a drug culture and too many
people want that pill; they don’t want the
responsibility of keeping their blood sugar levels under
control. Did you know that just cutting your
caloric intake will increase your insulin sensitivity
and thus lower your blood sugar levels? Did you know
that taking a walk after a meal will help keep your
blood sugar levels from spiking? Apple Cider Vinegar and Coconut Oil
both help stabilize your blood sugar, as does Cinnamon. And I know of two books that will give you all the secrets to ending your insulin insensitivity and maintain healthy blood sugar levels. I even wrote one of them:
For those of you who are pre-diabetic, these plans will
show you results the first week.
For you who already have Type II Diabetes, these plans
will take just a little longer.
And keep in mind that web sites around the world have
quoted this site on the subject of diabetes and trans
fats, and how getting good fats (especially Omega-3s)
into your body can help you turn your diabetes around.
My favorite product?
Omegasentials.
I’ve talked of this little guy
before, calling him a “wild concord grape.” Well, his
name is actually the Fox Grape, but that doesn’t change
anything. Wild fruits are better for us than
the domesticated versions. Fruits are bred for looks,
not potency. Taste is secondary, it seems to the
breeders. The wild strawberry, for example,
is smaller than a wild raspberry. They’re hardly any
bigger than an apple seed. But their antioxidant punch
is enormous. The phytochemicals, antioxidants,
vitamins, flavonoids in domesticated fruit cannot
compare to that found in the wild. The Fox Grape is just an example of
total health and wellness found in the bounty spread out
for us by our creator. The resveratrol will clean your
arteries, the ellagic acid will eat cancer cells, and
the antioxidants (pycnogenols) found in the seed (just
chew them up too) are incomparable. No capsule the size
of a Fox Grape can deliver the total nutrition of this
grape. We’ve just had our first frost in
Minnesota, and so I’m going out to pick some. They make
a great jelly and are even better for you eaten raw.
Enjoy. even better for you eaten raw.
Enjoy.
On September 24th I got this in my email: Today the health insurance marketplace looks different than it did yesterday, and the changes may affect you and your family. Get the facts! Starting today, companies can't deny coverage to children who have a pre-existing health problem. Starting today, health insurance companies must eliminate lifetime benefit caps, and phase out annual ones, so that people who have insurance don't "max out" the coverage if they fall sick. And when your health insurance plan next renews, you will be able to add your children up to the age of 26 if you wish to do so. Read our concise guide to the new benefits and the fine print--and then forward this email to friends and family so they can download it, too. We'll walk you through the new insurance plans available for people with pre-existing conditions, and changes to Medicare that might affect your benefits. From our product ratings in Consumer Reports to our investigative articles and shopping guides, Consumers Union tries to give you the facts about products and services so you can get the best deal for your dollar. Health insurance is no different. Check out our quick guide to the new health insurance marketplace here! We hope you and your family find this guide useful. If you like it, forward this email. You can help us get this critical information to many more people who might need it! Sincerely,
I found a site that tried to debunk
this video by pointing out that the technician can fake
the disappearance of something by tilting the
instrument. However, it would disappear from the inside
out, not from the top down, and the slightest movement
would show it growing back. It would have to be one heck
of a technician to do this. Even better evidence is that a
group of friends of mine who practice Qigong went to
China and got a chance to see this happen. They had the
technologist scan the area fully afterwards to see if
they could find something. And finally, why would a hospital
(in China they are financed by the government and most
hospitals are filled to capacity and then some) fake
something like this. They’ve nothing to gain. I’ll be posting more videos in the
future in our Qigong section.
A friend and reader buzzed me one
evening and asked me what I thought of Diatomaceous
Earth. I told her I’d heard about it, but never checked
it out. So she sent me a few web sites to peruse. Right
away I knew I was being bowled over with hype, so I
decided to check it out. The article is posted at our site:
Silica.
I get a lot of mail asking for
help. The one subject I seem to get the most is about
pain, back pain. Now, we all should know that as we
age, we have to exercise. We have to get up and move.
And we should all know that we have to get our omega-3s. But still, some people have waited
(and waited) and now they’re in pain. I found a product that has been
tested widely, the ingredients are top quality, and when
I wrote to the company asking to test their product,
they replied: “Why not let your readers test it?” So, I have a little booklet for you
on back pain, some dos and don’ts, and at the end is a
free offer to try their product. Fair enough? One more thing: since I don’t have
a bad back, will you please write me and tell me your
results. That’s all I ask:
info@mnwelldir.org
Here’s the book:
Back Pain Guide.
When the Republicans Lie About Health Care, We Have to Fight Back Share this hilarious video, "The (Mis)Informant," starring Jack Black to fight the corporate lies.
Europe has banned GMO foods. They won’t buy ours. Yet
our people are eating it daily because it’s
unmarked. Kraft Foods has been using GMO foods in
nearly all their products. And we are getting sick,
fat, and worn out.
The people of Europe fought GMO foods and won. We can too. We need to let
people know.
Some tell us that Terrorism is the greatest threat to
our nation while we let huge corporations poison us.
The greatest threat to our nation is ignorance.
Dupont Dame Follows Monsanto Men Into Obama AdministrationStarting with his choice for USDA Secretary, the pro-biotech former governor of Iowa, Tom Vilsack, President Obama has let Monsanto, Dupont and the other pesticide and genetic engineering companies know they'll have plenty of friends and supporters within his administration. President Obama has taken his team of food and farming leaders directly from the biotech companies and their lobbying, research, and philanthropic arms. Michael Taylor, former Monsanto Vice President, is now the FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods. Roger Beachy, former director of the Monsanto-funded Danforth Plant Science Center, is now the director of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Islam Siddiqui, Vice President of the Monsanto and Dupont-funded pesticide-promoting lobbying group, CropLife, is now the Agriculture Negotiator for the US Trade Representative. Rajiv Shah, former Gates Foundation agricultural-development director served as Obama's USDA Under Secretary for Research Education and Economics and Chief Scientist and is now head of USAID. Now, Ramona Romero, corporate counsel to Dupont, has been nominated by President Obama to serve as General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Tell Your Senators to Reject Ramona Romero and President Obama to Get Monsanto and Dupont Out of His Administration!
Terrorism: Why
They Want to Kill Us
Editor’s Note: Though this sort of
article is often labeled left wing socialist bullhockey,
I find it interesting that it came out of the Cato
Institute. July 02, 2010 "Huffington Post" -- The horrid attacks of 9/11 led to the cry: Why do they hate us? Most Americans seemed to believe that it was because we are such nice people. But the Times Square bomber reminds us that terrorism is mostly a response to U.S. government policies. After 9/11 President George W. Bush reassured Americans: we were attacked because we are beautiful people, spreading freedom around the world. But often the actions of our government are seen by others as less than beautiful. To seek an explanation for terrorism is not to excuse monstrous attacks on civilians. But understanding what motivates people to kill could help reduce terrorism in the future. Terrorism is not new. It was used against Russian Tsars, the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, and British colonial officials. Algerians employed terrorism against the French and later Algerian governments. Basque and Irish separatists freely relied on terrorism. Until Iraq, the most promiscuous suicide bombers were Tamils in Sri Lanka. In none of these cases did the killing occur in response to freedom, whether in America or elsewhere. Robert Pape of the University of Chicago studied the most recent cases: "The central fact is that overwhelmingly suicide-terrorist attacks are not driven by religion as much as they are by a clear strategic objective: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from the territory that the terrorists view as their homeland. From Lebanon to Sri Lanka to Chechnya to Kashmir to the West Bank, every major suicide-terrorist campaign--over 95 percent of all the incidents--has had as its central objective to compel a democratic state to withdraw." Consider Chechnya. Both suicide bombers in the recent Moscow subway attacks apparently were "Black Widows," whose militant husbands had been killed by Russian security forces. Even some conservatives, who typically decry discussion of "root causes" of terrorism, pointed to Russian brutality in Chechnya. Pape, along with Lindsey O'Rourke and Jenna McDermit, also of the University of Chicago, studied 63 Chechen suicide terrorists and found that few had religious motives. Rather: "As we have discovered in our research on Lebanon, the West Bank, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and elsewhere, suicide terrorist campaigns are almost always a last resort against foreign military occupation. Chechnya is a powerful demonstration of this phenomenon at work." As for America, the Defense Science Board Task Force reported in 2004: "Muslims do not 'hate our freedom,' but rather, they hate our policies." What might those be? Unseating democratically elected leaders, supporting dictatorships, backing Israel's Apartheid-like treatment of the Palestinians, and promiscuously waging war in Muslim lands. America is constantly "over there," as Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) put it. Nearly three decades ago President Ronald Reagan inserted U.S. forces into a multi-sided civil war in Lebanon to aid the minority Christian government which controlled little more than the capital of Beirut. Once Washington joined the conflict, the U.S. embassy and Marine Corps barracks became natural targets. In 1996 United Nations Ambassador Madeleine Albright was asked to justify sanctions against Iraq which, the questioner charged, had killed a half million children. Amb. Albright did not contest the claim. Instead, she responded chillingly: "we think the price is worth it." Muslims did not view as beautiful the assertion that Washington had the unilateral right to kill hundreds of thousands of Muslim children for its own purposes. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, one of the architects of the Iraq war, said of America's presence in Saudi Arabia: "It's been a huge recruiting device for al-Qaeda. In fact if you look at bin Laden, one of his principle grievances was the presence of so-called crusader forces on the holy land, Mecca and Medina." In Iraq both invasion and occupation have fomented terrorism. Daniel Benjamin, now the State Department's counter-terrorism coordinator, observed while at the Brookings Institution that "the invasion of Iraq gave the jihadists an unmistakable boost. Terrorism is about advancing a narrative and persuading a targeted audience to believe it." London's Chatham House reported that Iraq "gave a boost to the al-Qaeda network's propaganda, recruitment and fundraising, caused a major split in the coalition, provided an ideal targeting and training area for al-Qaeda-linked terrorists." Britain's Intelligence and Security Committee studied the July 2005 London attacks and concluded: "Iraq continues to act as a motivation and focus for terrorist activity." Many Islamists say the same thing. For instance, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda's deputy leader, spoke of "aggression against Iraq." Lebanese Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah stated that "the occupation of Iraq has increased acts of terrorism against the U.S. and everyone going along with it, including the Iraqis themselves." U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan appear to be having a similar effect. Before being relieved as Afghanistan commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal admitted: "We've shot an amazing number of people [at checkpoints] and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force." Faisal Shahzad, the naturalized American citizen who recently pled guilty after attempting to set off a car bomb in Times Square, was a troubled fellow, but there is no evidence that he disliked the liberties of the society which he chose to join. Instead, he grew to hate the policies carried out by the U.S. government. During his court hearing Shahzad said: "until the hour the U.S. pulls its forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan, and stops the occupation of Muslim lands, and stops killing the Muslims, and stops reporting the Muslims to its government, we will be attacking U.S." When the judge objected that people walking in Times Square had not attacked Muslims, Shahzad responded: "the people select the government; we consider them the same." As for children, he said: "the drone hits in Afghanistan and Iraq, they don't see children, they don't see anybody. They kill women, children. They kill everybody." Thus his resort to terrorism: "I am part of the answer to the U.S. terrorizing the Muslim nations and the Muslim people, and on behalf of that, I'm avenging the attacks." Unfortunately, Shahzad is not alone. He spent 40 days with Pakistani Taliban/jihadist forces, most notably the Tehrik-e-Taliban, from which he received money and explosives training. Which means the group has turned its attention from Pakistan, which has been conducting military operations against its strongholds, to the U.S. Wrote Bruce Riedel of the Brookings Institution: "This means the United States is facing a larger pool of terrorists in Pakistan committed to attacking al-Qaeda's target set than ever before." No doubt, some terrorists hope to reestablish the caliphate or knock Madonna off of television. But most anti-American terrorists appear to be motivated by something much more mundane: responding to U.S. government depredations in their own nations and other Muslim lands. Unfortunately, the Obama administration appears to be as clueless as its predecessor. After Shahzad's arrest U.S. officials raced to Islamabad to urge Pakistan to do more to stop terrorism. But Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said simply: "This is a blowback. This is a reaction. And you could expect that." The administration seems likely to increase its use of drones. However, Shahzad cited drone strikes. So did former CIA general counsel Jeffrey Smith, who in 2002 warned that they could "create more martyrs." The moral issues are daunting enough even if the intelligence is faultless, and it rarely is. Americans should consider how they would react if a more powerful nation was slaughtering their relatives and friends--and even entire families--in an attempt to kill a few targeted individuals alleged to be terrorists. There's also the problem of blowback. David Kilcullen, who advised Gen. David Petraeus on terrorism, and Andrew McDonald Exum, of the Center for a New American Security, recently argued: "on balance, the costs outweigh these benefits." By their count, drones have killed 700 civilians and just 14 terrorist leaders, a 50-to-1 ratio. Writing in the New Yorker Jane Mayer contended that the campaign to get one particular terrorist killed between 207 and 321 other people along the way. Even if the ratios are not so unbalanced, as claimed by U.S. officials, Kilcullen and Exum warned that "every one of these dead noncombatants represents an alienated family, a new desire for revenge, and more recruits for a military movement that has grown exponentially even as drone strikes have increased." Pakistanis believe the drones kill far more civilians than terrorists. Polls show enormous popular hostility towards America. Moreover, the U.S. has begun targeting Pakistani Taliban leaders. One U.S. official told the New York Times: "The Pakistani Taliban gets treated like al-Qaeda." However, that encourages the Pakistan Taliban to treat the U.S. like al-Qaeda treats the U.S. One intelligence officer said: "Those [drone] attacks have made it personal for the Pakistani Taliban--so it's no wonder they are beginning to think about how they can strike back at targets here." Jeffrey Addicott, a former legal adviser to U.S. Special Forces, said: "Some of the CIA operators are concerned that, because of its blowback effect, it is doing more harm than good." The same appears to be the case in Afghanistan, where civilians are dying in air strikes, at checkpoints, and from drone attacks. Afghan Najibullah Zazi, arrested last fall for planning a suicide bombing in the New York subway, explained: "I would sacrifice myself to bring attention to what the United States military was doing to civilians in Afghanistan by sacrificing my soul for the sake of saving other souls." Certainly civilian casualties have spurred more mundane guerrilla opposition to U.S. forces. New York Times reporter David Rohde was held captive for seven months by the Taliban. After he escaped he wrote that he "saw how some of the consequences of Washington's antiterrorism policies had galvanized the Taliban." For instance, "They said large numbers of civilians had been killed in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Palestinian territories in aerial bombings." To his complaint that he was a civilian, they said the U.S. "had held and tortured Muslims in secret detention centers for years," so why "should they treat me differently?" The point is not that there is never a legitimate case for military intervention or use of drones. However, the high costs of these tactics must be recognized and weighed. To reduce terrorism, Washington should do less, not more, abroad. September 11 demonstrated that America is not invulnerable. Washington no longer can expect to invade, bomb, and intervene in other nations without consequence. Policymakers should consider all the costs, including terrorism, before they casually thrust the U.S. into foreign controversies and conflicts. As Glenn Greenwald put it, "if we continue to bring violence to that part of the world, then that part of the world--and those who sympathize with it--will continue to want to bring violence to the U.S." That's why many people in other nations not only hate us, but are trying to kill us. Doug Bandow - Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute Generation Monsanto (GM) - Why We Need Labels on GM Foods NowGen-M, the first Monsanto Generation of humans force-fed genetically modified foods hasn't reached reproductive age yet (they were born in the late 1990s). But, if a critical mass of animal feeding studies are any indication, the millennial generation, reared on Food Inc.'s unlabeled "Frankenfoods" can look forward to a long-term epidemic of cancer, food allergies, learning disabilities, sterility, and birth defects. Corn (85% of U.S. production is GM), soy (91% GM), cotton (88% GM), canola (85% GM) and sugar beets (95% GM) are all genetically engineered by Monsanto to withstand massive doses of the company's glyphosate herbicide RoundUp, or else to exude their own pesticide, Bacillus Thuriengensis (Bt). RoundUp, the favorite weedkiller poison of non-organic farmers and gardeners, causes brain, intestinal and heart defects in fetuses. And scientists warn that RoundUp, the most extensively used herbicide in the history of agriculture, "may have dire consequences for agriculture such as rendering soils infertile, crops non-productive, and plants less nutritious." In addition, hundreds of thousands of US dairy cows are injected with genetically engineered Bovine Growth Hormone (developed by Monsanto) in spite of studies linking BGH with cancer, and longstanding bans on the drug in the EU, Japan, Canada, and most industrialized nations. With genetically modified foods and crops threatening public health and the environment, not to mention the next generation's reproductive capacity, why isn't there a massive consumer outcry to restrain Monsanto's biotech bullying and ban genetically engineered foods and agriculture? The answer is disturbingly simple. Collusion between Monsanto and elected public officials (including the current Obama Administration) has obscured the fact that almost all non-organic foods in the US contain GMOs. Despite poll after poll indicating that 85-95% of US consumers want mandatory labels on foods containing GMOs, Congress has heretofore listened to Monsanto and corporate agribusiness, rather than their own constituents. In the European Union, Japan, or South Korea, where GM foods must be labeled, there are no GM foods on grocery story shelves (and little or none served in restaurants), since most consumers would not buy them and a significant number would complain if they saw GMO labels on products. Consequently there are very few GM crops being cultivated in the EU (mainly a small amount of corn in Spain for animal feed). Most Americans simply do not understand that 80% of non-organic supermarket processed foods (basically every product containing soy, corn, canola, cottonseed oil, or sugar beet derivatives) are contaminated with GMOs. While nearly everyone in North America has eaten genetically modified foods, only 26% believe that they have. People don't think they're eating genetically modified foods because they have no way of knowing whether they are or not. Genetically modified foods aren't labeled. If we're going to save this generation from reproductive dysfunction and save our farmland from the ravages of RoundUp, we need to stop Monsanto. The first step is to protect consumers' right to know whether their food is genetically modified. We need genetically modified food labeled now! Write your Congresspersons and 2010 candidates for the House and Senate. Tell them to support mandatory labeling of all genetically modified foods. Partisan
Politics? Get Out of Here! Editor’s note: I wrote this
a while back for friends, and some asked me to
publish it. Perhaps it’s just part of the
End The Insanity movement afoot. We are not a charity because we
wanted to remain political. Health is political.
Health care, as we have all seen, is political. And there is nothing more
despicable in politics than partisan politics. Partisan Politics:
My side is
always right no matter what we do and your side is
always wrong no matter what you do. This is pure bulltwaddle. No
side is right all the time and no side is wrong all
the time. We can disagree with a philosophy, but
when you make that person, side, or political party
wrong all the time, then you’re not acting in good
faith and you can please take your arguments
elsewhere. During the 2008 election, we
received a lot of mail concerning a lot of hot
issues. We got mail from all ends of the political
spectrum. From the right side, I got this one
sentence more than anything else: We need smaller
government! I wrote back: That is a talking
point only. What do you really want? Most did not write back. Those
who did write back wrote in generalizations. I could
tell by those generalizations that 1. These people
were conservative, and 2. These people were not very
smart and all they could do was parrot what they’ve
heard. I often responded with, “Why is
it that conservatives run on the “small government”
slogan but when they get in office, they build the
government bigger than their opposition. I was told by many to whom I
said this that I was a liar. Oh? Let’s look at the facts;
let’s look at how much the national debt rose under
different presidents since Jimmy Carter:
The facts speak for themselves.
The platform conservatives have historically run on
is not the way they govern. It irks me also when if one
party does something, it’s good, but when the other
party does the same exact thing, it’s bad. A few months back the issue of
how to try the underwear bomber has been all over
the 24 hour news cycle. When the previous
administration tried terrorists in our court system,
it was good. When this administration tries them in
our court system, it’s bad. The leader of Al Qaeda,
Mohammed Khalid Sheikh who planned 9-11 is slated to
be tried in New York, exactly where those who
planned and carried out the first attack on the twin
towers were tried and convicted. When the first
trials took place, conservatives said nothing about
it. For this second trial, everything is wrong about
it. Attacking the other side for any reason possible
is posturing, not politics. It gets the country
nowhere. And the lies. Thank God for
fact checking web sites. Everyone can make a
mistake. I make mistakes in both my positions, as a
human being and as a journalist. But far too often
lies are circulated until they become the truth. And
the only reason they become the truth is that we
have far too many uninformed voters out there. It
embarrasses me how ignorant our average public has
become. I wrote on my Facebook page: No wonder the
tea partiers are against public health care when
it’s so painfully obvious how they’ve been failed by
public education. But the lying I won’t put up
with. When I see it, I’m going to call it out. God
Bless Al Franken for taking on the lies in the
senate. I happened to mention this, and
was immediately attacked with: “Al Franken is just
another left wing liar in with all those other
liars.” I challenged this person to
name me one lie Al Franken spouted. He couldn’t. Again, calling names at the
opposition simply because they are the opposition is
partisan politics. The problem with lies is that
if they are said enough, they become the truths of
the under-informed masses. When John Boehner stands
up and says, “The American public just doesn’t want
health care reform,” he is lying. His lie is based
upon a simple truth; The American public does not
want the health care reform that Boehner has
described and has helped to create. The American
public wants Single Payer or Medicare for All, but
the American public will NOT get what they want
until we remove money from politics. (And the
Supreme Court just sold out our democracy to the
highest bidder. Way to go. Roberts and Scalia should
have been arrested right after the decision on the
grounds that they lied to congress that they would
stick to precedent and not legislate from the
bench.) The current administration
published that over 300 terrorists have been
successfully tried and convicted within our system.
Top names from the far right stood up yelling, LIAR! Did they actually forget that
the last administration claimed that we’d
successfully tried over 300 terrorists? It’s hypocrisy and lying. And then there are the
Teleprompter decriers. Did they forget that Ronald
Reagan used the teleprompter, and when he was in
small groups he had crib sheet cards that even
reminded him to end his meetings with “God bless?” Ironically, using a
teleprompter takes a bit of skill. Our last Bush
couldn’t use one because it was just too difficult
for him. He preferred David Letterman like Cue
Cards. And then there are those who
need to write on their hands the things they believe
in. Hypocrisy. And finally, there are 20
senators who voted against the stimulus package, but
then turned around and dished out huge checks to
their states lauding the funding. They want it both ways. They
get to vote against it and then take the credit for
it afterwards. This kind of politics has to
end. We truly need to lift our fellow voters out of
their ignorance into the light. Sadly, some people
are just too stupid to realize how stupid they
really are. And they will continually support the
biggest liars and hypocrites in our government. I am not happy with Obama’s
first year in office, though I certainly feel much
better about his presidency than the last one. It’s
very refreshing to have an adult in the office, one
who actually thinks about decisions that affect
billions of human beings. I’m not happy with his
putting a Monsanto shill in charge of food safety.
I’m not happy with his leaning toward
biotechnologies and Frankenfoods. I’m not happy with
his war policies. I am not a partisan. I have
ideals and I live up to them. What I say, I do. What
I do, I take responsibility for. I want good
government. I want everyone in Incredible Magician What’s Really in Your Food?The psychology of conservatism and liberalismAn interesting article on the psychology of conservatism:
From: Conservatives Have Stronger Startle Reflexes?This backs up other similar findings, such as those in this Psychology Today piece:
But lest those with liberal leanings feel too smug, individual conservatives tend to respond to a wider range of ethical parameters than do liberals. The topic is too complex for me to explain briefly here, but this article is well worth reading. I intend to write more about it later.Click here: Hungary: Toxic red sludge has reached the Danube - Yahoo! News Easily Grossed Out? You Might Be A Conservative!ScienceDaily (June 5, 2009) — Are you someone who squirms when confronted with slime, shudders at stickiness or gets grossed out by gore? Do crawly insects make you cringe or dead bodies make you blanch? If so, chances are you're more conservative -- politically, and especially in your attitudes toward gays and lesbians -- than your less-squeamish counterparts, according to two Cornell studies. The results, said study leader David Pizarro, Cornell assistant professor of psychology, raise questions about the role of disgust -- an emotion that likely evolved in humans to keep them safe from potentially hazardous or disease-carrying environments -- in contemporary judgments of morality and purity. In the first study, published in the journal Cognition & Emotion, Pizarro and co-authors Yoel Inbar of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and Paul Bloom of Yale University surveyed 181 U.S. adults from politically mixed "swing states." They subjected these adults to two indexes: the Disgust Sensitivity Scale (DSS), which offers various scenarios to assess disgust sensitivity, and a political ideology scale. From this they found a correlation between being more easily disgusted and political conservatism. To test whether disgust sensitivity is linked to specific conservative attitudes, the researchers then surveyed 91 Cornell undergraduates with the DSS, as well as with questions about their positions on issues including gay marriage, abortion, gun control, labor unions, tax cuts and affirmative action. Participants who rated higher in disgust sensitivity were more likely to oppose gay marriage and abortion, issues that are related to notions of morality or purity. The researchers also found a weak correlation between disgust sensitivity and support for tax cuts, but no link between disgust sensitivity and the other issues. And in a separate study in the current issue of the journal Emotion, Pizarro and colleagues found a link between higher disgust sensitivity and disapproval of gays and lesbians. For this study, the researchers used implicit measures (measures that have been shown to assess attitudes people may be unwilling to report explicitly; or that they may not even know they possess). Liberals and conservatives disagree about whether disgust has a valid place in making moral judgments, Pizarro noted. Conservatives have argued that there is inherent wisdom in repugnance; that feeling disgusted about something -- gay sex between consenting adults, for example -- is cause enough to judge it wrong or immoral, even lacking a concrete reason. Liberals tend to disagree, and are more likely to base judgments on whether an action or a thing causes actual harm. Studying the link between disgust and moral judgment could help explain the strong differences in people's moral opinions, Pizarro said; and it could offer strategies for persuading some to change their views. "People have pointed out for a long time that a lot of our moral values seem driven by emotion, and in particular, disgust appears to be one of those emotions that seems to be recruited for moral judgments," said Pizarro. That can have tragic effects -- as in cases throughout history where minorities have been victims of discrimination by groups that perceived them as having disgusting characteristics. The research speaks to a need for caution when forming moral judgments, Pizarro added. "Disgust really is about protecting yourself from disease; it didn't really evolve for the purpose of human morality," he said. "It clearly has become central to morality, but because of its origins in contamination and avoidance, we should be wary about its influences." The studies were funded by Cornell.
Dogs have souls, but you already
knew that
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...83_dogs16.html
http://workingamerica.org/jobtracker
Find out which companies in
your area…
·
Are exporting jobs
·
Have massive layoffs
·
Have OSHA violations
·
Have NLRA (National Labor Relations Act) violations
·
Have Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
violations Google 411
Here's a number worth putting in your cell phone, or
your home phone speed dial: 1-800-goog411. This is
an awesome service from Google, and it's free --
great when you are on the road.
I use this all the time. It’s great!
![]()
No
one believes seniors . . . everyone
thinks they are senile.
An elderly
couple was celebrating their
sixtieth anniversary. The couple had
married as childhood sweethearts and
had moved back to their old
neighborhood after they retired.
Holding hands, they walked back to
their old school. It was not locked,
so they entered, and found the old
desk they'd shared, where Andy had
carved I love you, Sally .
On their way back home, a bag of
money fell out of an armored car,
practically landing at their feet.
Sally quickly picked it up and, not
sure
what to do
with it, they took it home. There,
she counted the money-fifty thousand
dollars! Andy said, We've got to
give it back. Sally said, Finders
keepers. She put the money back in
the bag and hid it in their attic.
The next day,
two police officers were canvassing
the neighborhood looking for the
money, and knocked on their door.
Pardon me, did either
of you find a
bag that fell out of an armored car
yesterday? Sally said, No. Andy
said, She's lying. She hid it up in
the attic. Sally said, Don't believe
him, he's getting senile!
The agents turned to Andy and began
to question him. One said: Tell us
the story from the beginning. Andy
said, Well, when Sally and I were
walking home from school yesterday
....The first police officer turned
to his partner and said, We're outta
here!
A Jewish father was troubled by the way his son turned out, and went to see his Rabbi about it. "I brought him up in the faith, gave him a very expensive bar mitzvah. Then he tells me last week he has decided to be a Christian! Rabbi, where did I go wrong?" "Funny you should come to me," said the Rabbi. "Like you I, too, brought my boy up in the faith, then one day he, too, tells me he has decided to become a Christian." "What did you do?" asked the father. "I turned to God for the answer," replied the Rabbi. "And what did he say?" pressed the father. "God said, 'Funny you should come to me ....' " Two Signs on our
Southern Border
Two Signs at Ground
Zero
Sister Mary Ann, who worked for a home health agency, was out making her rounds visiting homebound patients when she ran out of gas. As luck would have it, a gas station was just a block away. She walked to the station to borrow a gas can and buy some gas. The attendant told her that the only gas can he owned had been loaned out, but she could wait until it was returned. Since Sister Mary Ann was on the way to see a patient, she decided not to wait and walked back to her car. She looked for something in her car that she could fill with gas and spotted the bedpan she was taking to the patient. Always resourceful, Sister Mary Ann carried the bedpan to the station, filled it with gasoline, and carried the full bedpan back to her car. As she was pouring the gas into her tank, two Baptists watched from across the street. One of them turned to the other and said, 'If it starts, I'm turning Catholic.'
|